Do you think Obongo would order a retaliatory nuke strike on the NORKS?

Site Notices

[ARCHIVED THREAD] - Do you think Obongo would order a retaliatory nuke strike on the NORKS? (Page 1 of 3)

Posted: 6/14/2009 5:37:45 AM EDT

Although it would ultimately cost him the presidency, I do not think Obongo would order a retaliatory nuclear strike if the NORKS popped one off on us or our allies. He would have some BS about "Being better than our enemies". Of course some here would too.......

Posted: 6/14/2009 5:42:52 AM EDT

[#1]

He'd probably ask nancy pelousy to draft a bill to give $600 billion in tribute to Lil Kim to appease him.

Posted: 6/14/2009 5:44:12 AM EDT

[#2]

Never ever we would shitcan our arsenal to promote peace

Where is Dloken at?

Posted: 6/14/2009 5:45:51 AM EDT

[#3]

<Hans Brix>

We will be very angry with you... and we will write you a letter, telling you how angry we are.

</Hans Brix>

Sad but true

Posted: 6/14/2009 5:46:54 AM EDT

[#4]

Our illustrious Eunuch-In-Chief doesn't have the balls.

Posted: 6/14/2009 5:47:53 AM EDT

[#5]

Quoted:
Our illustrious Eunuch-In-Chief doesn't have the balls.

That is basically what I'm driving at.

Posted: 6/14/2009 5:48:55 AM EDT

[#6]

Quoted:

Quoted:
Our illustrious Eunuch-In-Chief doesn't have the balls.

That is basically what I'm driving at.

This as well

Posted: 6/14/2009 5:49:16 AM EDT

[#7]

I'm probably mistaken, but didn't the Kenyan say that nuclear retaliation would never be considered an option very early in his campaign?

Posted: 6/14/2009 5:49:42 AM EDT

[#8]

No.

Posted: 6/14/2009 5:49:50 AM EDT

[#9]

No, he doesn't have the stones.

Posted: 6/14/2009 6:07:05 AM EDT

[#10]

shit he'd find a way to reimburse KJI for the cost of the nukes he fired at us.

Posted: 6/14/2009 6:08:10 AM EDT

[#11]

How quickly could south korea produce a nuke or 2?

Posted: 6/14/2009 6:10:03 AM EDT

[#12]

no, he has his hands full with "hope and change" here at home

Posted: 6/14/2009 6:10:48 AM EDT

[#13]

Quoted:

shit he'd find a way to reimburse KJI for the cost of the nukes he fired at us.

I was going to simply say no but this ^^^ is much better.

Posted: 6/14/2009 6:12:24 AM EDT

[#14]

Quoted:
How quickly could south korea produce a nuke or 2?

Not as fast as the Japanese. They could pop one out in no time at all.

Posted: 6/14/2009 6:21:26 AM EDT

[#15]

Quoted:

Quoted:
How quickly could south korea produce a nuke or 2?

Not as fast as the Japanese. They could pop one out in no time at all.

Just about to say that. I think the Japanese would take care of NK. I think they have the world's largest supply of weapons grade plutonium, and their satelite launch rockets are very, very similar to the Trident.

Posted: 6/14/2009 6:25:10 AM EDT

[#16]

Tens of thousands of American dead attributed to a nuclear attack by a Nation/State, and the decision won't be his to make.

Posted: 6/14/2009 6:25:39 AM EDT

[#17]

Quoted:

He'd probably ask nancy pelousy to draft a bill to give $600 billion in tribute to Lil Kim to appease him.

+1

By using the nukes, they are asking the Whiny One for, and he will give them a stimilus package

Posted: 6/14/2009 6:25:48 AM EDT

[#18]

BHO? Not a chance.

Posted: 6/14/2009 6:26:24 AM EDT

[#19]

would we even need to nuke NK to retaliate?

Posted: 6/14/2009 6:26:25 AM EDT

[#20]

nope

Posted: 6/14/2009 6:27:11 AM EDT

[#21]

Or... He would ban firearms in the US

Posted: 6/14/2009 6:32:40 AM EDT

[#22]

Quoted:
Or... He would ban firearms in the US

Probably show how nuclear weapons sold at gunshows in San Angelo were smuggled to the Sinaloa Cartel and then exported in the holds of Exxon Mobil supertankers with whale hunter crews to Israel which then sold them the NORKs and then call for the gunshow nuclear weapons loophole to be closed.

Posted: 6/14/2009 6:34:35 AM EDT

[#23]

Quoted:

Quoted:
Or... He would ban firearms in the US

Probably show how nuclear weapons sold at gunshows in San Angelo were smuggled to the Sinaloa Cartel and then exported in the holds of Exxon Mobil supertankers with whale hunter crews to Israel which then sold them the NORKs and then call for the gunshow nuclear weapons loophole to be closed.

Posted: 6/14/2009 6:36:31 AM EDT

[#24]

I don't think he'd retaliate if someone slapped his wife and kids if front of him, on the White House lawn.

Posted: 6/14/2009 6:37:39 AM EDT

[#25]

No, and he would take to the airwaves apologizing to the world for our provocation of the attack and vow to end US aggression for once and for all.

Posted: 6/14/2009 6:48:20 AM EDT

[#26]

He would announce that he needs "special powers" during this "unfortunate time of man made disasters" .

Posted: 6/14/2009 6:50:25 AM EDT

[#27]

He would announce confidently that it was now time to begin robust debate.

Posted: 6/14/2009 6:55:02 AM EDT

[#28]

Quoted:
He'd probably ask nancy pelousy to draft a bill to give $600 billion in tribute to Lil Kim to appease him.

Yep, no shit!

Posted: 6/14/2009 7:17:55 AM EDT

[#29]

Quoted:
Tens of thousands of American dead attributed to a nuclear attack by a Nation/State, and the decision won't be his to make.

This asshole is so narcissitic that he would just know that no retaliation would be the right thing and no one would question him.

Posted: 6/14/2009 7:52:02 AM EDT

[#30]

Quoted:
shit he'd find a way to reimburse KJI for the cost of the nukes he fired at us.

No, and this.

Posted: 6/14/2009 7:59:55 AM EDT

[#31]

I don't believe that POS fake would do anything to save the U.S. from anything. He's already destroying it...why would he care?

HH

Posted: 6/14/2009 8:04:22 AM EDT

[#32]

Quoted:
I don't believe that POS fake would do anything to save the U.S. from anything. He's already destroying it...why would he care?

HH

He wouldn't let a crisis go to waste and would grab more power to use against his own citizens.

Posted: 6/14/2009 8:05:31 AM EDT

[#33]

Who WOULD retaliate with nukes? I think it's safe to say if we launch a nuke it would be against a city, or least would result in huge civilian casualties....why would we retaliate with nukes when we can launch precision warheads against military targets while limiting civvie casualties?

My point is, I don't think ANY president would use nukes.

Posted: 6/14/2009 8:06:50 AM EDT

[#34]

No.

Posted: 6/14/2009 8:12:55 AM EDT

[#35]

I'll buck the trend: in the OP's situation he'd give the go-ahead.

A) because his number one goal is winning a second term.
B) see A

Posted: 6/14/2009 8:18:26 AM EDT

[#36]

nope,he would appease them with talks....

Posted: 6/14/2009 8:22:34 AM EDT

[#37]

The US will NOT go to nuclear war over South Korea, Israel or Taiwan.

I'm not as sure about Japan.
5sub

Posted: 6/14/2009 8:26:02 AM EDT

[#38]

Quoted:
I'll buck the trend: in the OP's situation he'd give the go-ahead.

A) because his number one goal is winning a second term.
B) see A

His do-nothing policy is the go-ahead.

ETA- oops , for the NORKs to nuke.

Posted: 6/14/2009 8:27:40 AM EDT

[#39]

Quoted:

Although it would ultimately cost him the presidency,

I do not think Obongo would order a retaliatory nuclear strike if the NORKS popped one off on us or our allies.

I do not think Obongo would order a retaliatory nuclear strike if the NORKS popped one off on us

Wrong. Lil Kim would glow in the dark and the entire North Korean portion of the Korean peninsula would glow in the dark.

....or our allies.

Would be dependant on which ally was hit.

5sub

Posted: 6/14/2009 8:28:49 AM EDT

[#40]

obama would probably try to talk it out with somebody who was currently biffin him in the face.

Posted: 6/14/2009 8:29:43 AM EDT

[#41]

See my sigline.
It wouldn't be the Puppet in Chief's decision to make.

Posted: 6/14/2009 8:32:53 AM EDT

[#42]

Quoted:

I'll buck the trend: in the OP's situation he'd give the go-ahead.

A) because his number one goal is winning a second term.

B) see A

XJ, I 'believe' barry o is an ideologue. I'm not sure he cares much about a 2nd term if he can push through his agenda in the first term.
5sub

However, I do expect he will be elected to a second term.

Posted: 6/14/2009 8:33:03 AM EDT

[#43]

I admit I haven't read the other posts but my first reaction was,

"Hell no. That would require a big-boy decision that departed from his Let's All Hug mentality"

Posted: 6/14/2009 8:33:22 AM EDT

[#44]

I personally believe he does have the balls. I think if pushed he will act. The problem is that he believes he can fix the United States, and the world by being who he is. He truly believes that a good speech fixes everything, and that if it comes from his mouth it is the truth and the world will believe him and act accordingly. Because of this, he will not act, as he truly believes the War solves nothing.......

Posted: 6/14/2009 8:38:27 AM EDT

[#45]

Quoted:
Who WOULD retaliate with nukes? I think it's safe to say if we launch a nuke it would be against a city, or least would result in huge civilian casualties....why would we retaliate with nukes when we can launch precision warheads against military targets while limiting civvie casualties?

My point is, I don't think ANY president would use nukes.

Okay, I see that. However, I don't think he would retaliate in any way except harsh words, written or spoken, and am not even sure he would do that.

Posted: 6/14/2009 8:38:37 AM EDT

[#46]

FDR had bigger balls than obama

Posted: 6/14/2009 8:39:01 AM EDT

[#47]

Quoted:
Who WOULD retaliate with nukes? I think it's safe to say if we launch a nuke it would be against a city, or least would result in huge civilian casualties....why would we retaliate with nukes when we can launch precision warheads against military targets while limiting civvie casualties?

My point is, I don't think ANY president would use nukes.

I would light a nuke off in no time if someone killed Americans in a nuclear attack. Bush would have, and if 1000's of soldiers get nuked in SK I bet the military will talk obongo into it.