As a CPA, teh Enron debacle has hit close to home for me. So, I'm floating this trial balloon to test a possible solution. Your mision, should you choose to accept it, is to poke holes in my theory. Admittedly, this one has NOT been fully thought thru by me yet.
First a word of explanation ....
The "independent auditors" (Arthur Andewsen, in this case) are paid for their audit BY the audit client - Enron. So, should audit issues arise, the auditors ability to get paid for their audit is diminished by blowing teh whistle. That's what we call "a conflict of interest" where I come from.
The solution for this, to the Democrats and the Marxists out there, is to have audits paid for by the gov't. Well, naturally, I don't like this.
So, what do you do????
Its an honored American tradition that those who benefit from a service should pay for it. In this case, the shareholders are teh beneficiaries of the audit.
So, here's my solution -
All publicly traded companies audits should be paid for thru mutual funds and stock brokerage organizations. When a fund or individual security is purchased, the SEC, or the NYSE, or the NASDAQ (all non-gov't organizations) could charge a surcharge that would form a pool of funds out of which audit fees could be paid to the independent auditors.
This would make fund managers the ones who call the shots re: the audit, and shareholders would pay the cost of getting true and accurate information.
Disclaimer: I'm not even really sure that THIS drastic a solution is necesary. But should these problems continue, it **** MAY ***** become necessary.
All right - rip away!!!!!!!