Well, I don't hate cops, nor do I intend to bash them, so here's my .02 before taxes....
1. I generally oppose any legislation that furthers the gulf of difference between civilians and Law Enforcement Officers with regards to 'privelages and powers' while NOT on duty. This bill is precisely that. To me it is an outright message that 'an off duty or retired law enforcement officer has more worth/ is more responsible/is more trustworthy than a mere citizen'.
2. I respect the job of Law Enforcement, and while I don't agree with every instance, there are CERTAIN TIMES when LEO's will require the use of hardware that is currently restricted to civilians. However, with consideration to being off duty....I have yet to be explained exactly why, exactly what magic aura exists that would necessitate LEO's to IGNORE FEDERAL AND STATE LAW!
3. While I do not intend to disrespect the LEAA, as they are the only organization to represent both LEO's and citizens (as well as the REAL positions of the LEO community, not the politicians), if they truly believe that this might be a stepping stone to national reciprocity, they have simply lost touch with reality. The only reason this bill is receiving support is because the word LEO is written all over it. "...that many anti-self-defense legislators should see the wisdom in expanding coverage of the law"....bovine fecal material. Anyone show me when Fienstein, Boxer, Schumer, Lautenberg, or ANY of the gun grabbers voted to EXPAND the 2nd amendment rights of citizens. They trust cops....not serfs.
4. The practice of 'badge=CCW' has been in existence for quite some time, and while not everywhere it is fairly common, and as I understand fairly against the law. Of course, when something is against the law and normal people do it, does Congress merely say 'very well, make it legal'? I don't wish to say it excuses those who violate the law, but in a sense it does.
5. With regards to the 'stepping stone'....I have asked and have yet to receive a reply....which of any of the prospective firearms laws that have provided exemptions for LEO's EVER been rescinded, or have those exemptions extended to the public at large? High cap mags? Import firearms? Assault weapons?
6. "With that in mind it is important to point out that LEAA is in no way trying to place current and former police officers in a separate status, above others. In fact, retired officers are regular citizens much the same as those who have never been in law enforcement. Thus LEAA believes that passing HR 218 will initiate the first step in passing legislation that will allow national reciprocity for all permit holders."
Rather contradictory in my opinion. You don't want to place LEO's 'above others', and retired officers are regular citizens, but yet that is EXACTLY what this legislation does. I have a hard time believing this 'intention' does not exist. And if retired LEO's are regular citizens, WHY THE HELL DO YOU SAY THEY SHOULD HAVE A RIGHT TO IGNORE THE LAW?
That's generally my beef. I've been flamed like hell for it, but I don't much care. I have a respect for police officers and their job...but well ALL have lives to protect...and we all bleed, and we all die.