Quoted:
Suing gun manufactures because their products cause a “public nuisance” is absurd.
View Quote
Yup. This is a "back door" way for the gun-haters to forward their twisted agenda.
Quoted: Lawsuits should only be filed if there are injuries caused by a product not operating properly due to poor design...
View Quote
...or defective manufacture. And, I would say that the vast majority of cases where injury is caused by deficient design or manufacture could be settled without any courts at all. I mean, most manufacturers would be happy to compensate their customer in the event of an unfortunate happening involving their product. They don't want any bad publicity. If their product truly is at fault, most of them would offer some kind of good faith compensation.
The only time there is a need to go to court is when:
1) There is a disagreement between the user and the manufacturer as to the cause of the injury (misuse or defective product).
2) The manufacturer refuses to act in good faith to settle the issue which is due to their fault.
3) Some A-hole figures he'll get really rich if he sues.
4) Another A-hole (or group of A-holes) uses the opportunity to villify and take down an industry.
5) A politician (or aspiring politician) uses the situation to further his own political career.
Quoted: Suits should not be filed for injuries resulting from intentional misuse
View Quote
No reasonable person would disagree with you there. Unfortunately, reason seems to be in short supply these days...
Quoted: Likewise, if a criminal murders someone with a gun, it is the criminal’s misuse of the gun, not a poor gun design, which results in death. Guns that are used in a safe, legal manner very rarely cause injuries.
View Quote
True, so true. Almost any implement could be used as a murder weapon. A brick, a kitchen knife, an ice pick, a pipe, a folding chair, a baseball bat, a can of gasoline, a forklift truck, a sharpened stick, etc, etc...