The description in the TV listings really made me angry...something to the effect that "an anti-government family decides to confront the government."
Only on TV would being murdered on your own property by ATF thugs constitute "confronting the government."
As for Ruby Ridge, the two best books I've found(besides Weaver's) are "Every Knee Shall Bow" and "Ambush at Ruby Ridge." Both are pretty impartial. One interesting thing that one of the two books mention(can't remember which one) is that there was some doubt over whether or not Weaver actually cut the barrel below 18" inches. I believe his stance was that it had been cut after the fact, by the informant.
By the way, supremacism and seperatism are two sides of the same coin. The racist label can be applied to both. Seperatists are definition supremacists, since they believe that their own kind are better neighbors.
Edited to add one thing. I'm not sure how holding racist beliefs makes one "bad" or "good". He served his country, honourably, by all accounts he was a great family man, and he had and has many friends. His personal beliefs are irrelevant as to his "goodness", since his actions proved such. Who decides what is "good" and "bad", anyway? Are the millions of people in the past who held racist beliefs now considered "bad" people? Was the United States populated by "bad" people 100 years ago when segregation was the law?