check this out:

http://www.newsmax.com/commentarchive.shtml?a=2001/12/13/234829

[-=(_)=-]

[url]http://www.newsmax.com/commentarchive.shtml?a=2001/12/13/234829[/url]

i think it's disgusting that the evidence was destroyed.

but i think it's even more disgusting that the author of the article assumes certain guesses to be truth.



hardly.  

the guy should have stuck to the facts of the NTSB throwing out good evidence.  period.  his addition of his opinions of the cause of TWA 800's crash sorely hurt his credibility with me.  speculating that there were reasons to hide the evidence and later destroy it are one thing (like a missile attack).  but this guys acts like he's got irrefutable proof that the government's explanation is wrong.  yet he didn't give any.

FWIW, i don't buy the government's explanation either.  but this is a prime example of irresponsible journalism.

How long should they hold onto 400 tons of evidence?