Quoted:
If they're the same, than do you think Bill Clinton is the same as, say, GW Bush?
View Quote
YES.
GW may have an "image" engineered and spun for him that conservative types can appreciate more, (except for that whole dui thing that everyone forgets about, but at least he didn't smoke a joint or get a hummer) But deep down inside they have the same goals, furthering their careers, lining their pockets and contributing to the good of the GOVERNMENT. Not the country, not the people, though they will pretend to be for the good of both country and especially the people in order to get support. A president should be for the good of the country and country only, the people need to make their own way, and the government needs to go on a serious diet.
GW has pissed on more [i]constitutional rights[/i] in the past 2 months that affect us all than clinton did in 8 years. There's more issues than guns, 94CB assault weapons ban? means DICK to me in terms of what I can and can't do, I need no flash hiders, I need no bayonets, I've got all the $15 pre-ban rifle mags I need, and I could truthfully have just as much fun with 10 round ones. Pistol mags, wellll..If I need a new glock mag and wanted a 13 round one, I could buy 5 10 round ones and a vest to carry them in for the same price, thats strange. Still doesn't mean that much to me as to how it affects me personally. It means everything to me in fact that freedoms were taken away from those who do appreciate such things, just as the "Patriot" act does to those who previously enjoyed [b]GUARANTEED[/b] privacy, 1st 4th and 5th ammendment protections. Probably a bit more than the SMALL percentage (myself included) of 80 million gun owners clinton pissed off, wouldn't ya say?
Having said that, I take back my yes and say, No...GW's worse.