Harry Bonar v. Hugh G. Rection: Fudd beleives that silencer owners are criminals.

Site Notices

TNVC Partners With Envision Technology - MARS Rangefinder & RAIL Family, MARS-Lc In-Stock!

[ARCHIVED THREAD] - Harry Bonar v. Hugh G. Rection: Fudd beleives that silencer owners are criminals.

Posted: 7/20/2008 2:25:09 PM EDT

Now this is funny,

A guy named Harry Bonar (get it) posts that anyone who has a silencer is a bad person and going to do something illegal. Seriously, who posts as Hairy Boner or Harry Bonar? Can you take this guy seriously?

Harry Bonar thinks that having a silencer makes someone a criminal - the firing line

Now Hugh G. Rection has jumped in the mix:

Harry Bonar wrote:
When I see a silencer on a rifle I think that it is going to be used for an illegal purpose - and - that the individual using one isn't using it for hearing protection but for some stupid illegal purpose.

The ONLY reason I personally can see for a silencer is poaching or some other erroneouus activity. This is just my personal opinion. If I was going to poach or god forbid shoot people in a city surrounding - yea - I might want a silencer! I'm not sorry for my opinion, nor my post but I cannot for the life of me understand this eruption of comment.
Harry B.

It appears that there is no respect given to a 73 year old mans simple opinion anymore.

I worked contracted for Wayne Novaks 45 Shop for years on special projects.

I am a loyal American and support the second amendment.

David Hinelein summed it up best:

Harry since you see a person with the equipment to be an assasin when you see a silencer.

I happended to notice that your mother,wife, and daughter all have the equipment to be prostitues so I will just assume they are in that line of work.

You are the worst kind of gun owner, unlike the anti gunners you pretend you support gun owners rights then stab them in the back every chance you get.
You are a true turd.

And them Huge G. Rection jumped in on page 4, but Hairy Boner hasn't come back to respond.

This is another example of the problem that we have with the Fudds. They belive that he 2nd amendment only relates to their double shotguns and bolt guns.

Posted: 7/20/2008 2:30:48 PM EDT

[#1]

We need an "Adopt a FUDD" day.

Posted: 7/20/2008 4:15:59 PM EDT

[#2]

adopt a fudd . . . . classic

Posted: 7/20/2008 6:22:53 PM EDT

[#3]

I actually didn't say that - you quoted someone else... but I did own those guys in that thread pretty hard.

You are factually incorrect and an enemy of shooters and the 2nd Amendment. That is all.

Dude, you're tilting at windmills here, with no tenable position and no point that is possibly defensible.

You might as well say that concealed carry is illegal in every state and oppose talking about it on forums because it makes gun owners look bad. Neither is true.

Just keep digging.

Again, you are factually incorrect and you keep revealing your irrational bias against suppressors. You might as well assume that anyone who owns a handgun for self defense or carries a CCW has it for murdering people or "some stupid illegal purpose.". Both are equally irrational, mindless, and anti-gun.

Silencers typically either have no effect or increase the accuracy of centerfire rifles (in part due to the "calm, controlled atmosphere" just past the muzzle).

These are both 1/4 MOA barrels.. yes, with suppressors:

Glad you finally figured out the point I made in post #50.

Posted: 7/20/2008 8:04:39 PM EDT

[#4]

I think David Hienline said that.

You did a good job of confusing the issue with facts.

Posted: 7/20/2008 8:05:37 PM EDT

[#5]

There is no such thing as "silencers" only suppressors.

Posted: 7/20/2008 8:11:17 PM EDT

[#6]

Zumbo V. 2.0

Posted: 7/20/2008 8:11:27 PM EDT

[#7]

What a douche nozzle.

Posted: 7/20/2008 8:29:53 PM EDT

[#8]

fucking pathetic

Posted: 7/20/2008 9:14:11 PM EDT

[#9]

Quoted:
There is no such thing as "silencers" only suppressors.

I dunno . . . I would call a .22 suppressor a true "silencer," since all you can hear is the bolt cycling.

Posted: 7/20/2008 10:26:37 PM EDT

[#10]

Quoted:

Quoted:
There is no such thing as "silencers" only suppressors.

I dunno . . . I would call a .22 suppressor a true "silencer," since all you can hear is the bolt cycling.

Hiram Maxim called um silencers and he invented the things
ATF calls them silencers too

just saying

Posted: 7/21/2008 12:52:09 PM EDT

[#11]

there are no such things as harry bonars . . . . just Hugh G. Rections.

Posted: 7/21/2008 12:59:10 PM EDT

[#12]

I guess that Mrs D. V. Gina kept her lips closed during this whole debattle.

Posted: 7/21/2008 1:04:07 PM EDT

[#13]

I'm glad the moderators Harry Nuts and Heywood Jablowme were able to keep the thread under control.

Posted: 7/21/2008 1:07:02 PM EDT

[#14]

What are you....A hitman?!?

Posted: 7/21/2008 1:08:19 PM EDT

[#15]

I'm sure Ben Dover and Phil McCrack will be along shortly to add their two cents.

Posted: 7/21/2008 1:10:32 PM EDT

[#16]

Wilma Fingerdoo was quoted as saying......

Posted: 7/21/2008 1:12:39 PM EDT

[#17]

Stu Pedaso will clear it all up.

Posted: 7/21/2008 1:27:02 PM EDT

[#18]

Sounds like the same guy that was spewing this crap at The Fal Files a couple of months ago.

Needless to say he was booted...

Posted: 7/21/2008 2:11:22 PM EDT

[#19]

Wow, just wow. We are our own worst enemies. I love how the zumbos always say they support the 2nd without even noticing they only support the parts they agree with. Next they usually refer to themselves as sportsman, as if that has even the slightest to do with the 2nd amendment

Posted: 7/21/2008 2:16:18 PM EDT

[#20]

Quoted:
I guess that Mrs D. V. Gina kept her lips closed during this whole debattle.

Or her brother in law, Howie Feltersnatch.

Posted: 7/21/2008 2:18:57 PM EDT

[#21]

Has Howie Feltersnatch posted yet?

Posted: 7/21/2008 2:23:02 PM EDT

[#22]

I love the comment made by Oliver Clohssoff

Posted: 7/21/2008 2:35:07 PM EDT

[#23]

Quoted:
Wow, just wow. We are our own worst enemies. I love how the zumbos always say they support the 2nd without even noticing they only support the parts they agree with. Next they usually refer to themselves as sportsman, as if that has even the slightest to do with the 2nd amendment

I know, what total fucking bull shit.

"Hurr, hurr, sporting arms...huntin....hurrr"

Of course, it's great to see guys who hunt, wear camo everything, and have EBR's and Class III.

Posted: 7/21/2008 2:44:35 PM EDT

[#24]

tag for further reading

Posted: 7/21/2008 7:22:20 PM EDT

[#25]

Too funny . . .
Can you imagine going through jr. high with the name Harry Bonar?

No wonder he truned into a fucktard.

Posted: 7/21/2008 7:25:17 PM EDT

[#26]

Harry's son or grandson Joe built my custom Hi Power a few years back. A very talented gunsmith to say the least.

RR

Posted: 7/21/2008 7:28:21 PM EDT

[#27]

This thread delivers. Thanks for the laugh.

Posted: 7/21/2008 8:15:18 PM EDT

[#28]

How could someone be so dense yet say they are all for the 2nd. Zero had about zero chance to put forth a logical case for what he was saying. I have no idea how Zac didnt just call zero the idiot he was.

Posted: 7/21/2008 8:28:52 PM EDT

[#29]

On THR and TFL, the best strategy I have found is to refute early and often, with steel-trap logic and references and without even justified personal attack. Eventually they give up, but they usually dig themselves in deeper for everyone to see before it comes to that.

-z

Posted: 7/21/2008 8:32:43 PM EDT

[#30]

God, reading that made my head spin

How much mis-information can you get into one thread?

Posted: 8/1/2008 6:10:14 AM EDT

[#31]

This is [partially] what I posted in the other thread:

This sums it up for me. Suppressors are gentlemanly and considerate to use, especially in the presence of your fellow man:

Perhaps it is my eternal optimism, but I look forward to a day when suppressors (legally, "silencers") are de-listed from the NFA.

[ARCHIVED THREAD] - Harry Bonar v. Hugh G. Rection: Fudd beleives that silencer owners are criminals.

General » General Discussion

Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.

Warning

Confirm Action

About AR15.COM

Stay Connected

Newsletter

Contact Us