Now, I really DO NOT have any issue with DPs. If you want to call a freakin' stalk of broccoli your DP, I really don't give two shits. But I *do* mind the double standard for how to prove so.
My company is auditing all FT folks who have benefits, and asking us to prove that those on our plans are, in fact, either our spouses, DPs, or dependents. Great. Really. I support this, and I hope we catch some scofflaws. However, the burden of proof is unduly complicated for me, versus someone with a DP.
As for me, I have to provide copies of my 2007 tax statement, showing my wife on it and my kids. Also, the kid's birth certificates, and my wife and I's marriage license. Really, no big deal, I suppose. However, ya wanna guess what a domestic partnership has to do? It's as simple as signing a note "promising" that you are, in fact, DPs, and provide a bank loan, mortgage statement, or any damned thing else with both your names on it, going back at least 3 months.
And ya know what? That's fine, too. But why do I have to do one thing, and they another? If we are going to "accept" certain things, then the burden of proof needs to be brought to the common level, and not different for each thing. It is simply unfair that I should have to have such a large level of documentation, but a DP needs such little, for the same thing.
And that's all I have to say about that.