Whoooaaa there fellas,
Am I the only one who actually founf this article amazingly balanced comapred to the American media? Maybe it's because I don't live in the US right now. I always felt it was a given that there were too many guns in the hands of criminals in this country. That is exactly why even an outright ban, even if effective and enforceable, would only disarm the law-abiding.
Heck, the article flat out called Bu!!$hit on Clinton with regard to that 1st grader shooting thing with the gun from the Crack House. I've yet to see an major American news source question Clinton's statement on that.
They did seem to me not advocate anything, simply stated a few positions on various sides of the issue. It is about time someone admitted that the harebrained schemes of america's gun grabbers are pointless to solve the real problem. We simply need to get the guns out of the hands of criminals. That is a given. How do we do that? That is a question pondered by socialists who always look to the government for answers. You should expect that. I do my part by securing my own weapons when I am not at home. Some people just want a solution that gos beyond individual responsibility. Admittedly though, Englans has it's own problems with guns that they really oughta be analyzing.
Adam
PS: I too used to bring guns to an inner-city high school to shoot at a range. Many of us did - we never shot anybody. This was only 9 years ago! That school has metal detectors and full time police presence now! The problem is obviously not anybody's access to guns - but stopping this epidemic of nutcases from getting guns - all the while maintaining our rights. You could see how the problem would drive a "govt. is the solution" type person nuts, even if they are less biased than our own media.