I looked at this question for a few minutes, because everybody regards events through the lens of their own particular beliefs and worldview. But then, I decided that the question was not regarding value judgements, but rather simply the full span and breadth of the facts. It seems to me to be almost self explanatory, that there [i]is[/i] absolute truth. By the word "absolute", that views the facts that support all viewpoints involved, plus takes into account the emotions that take part in influencing the views (and therefore behaviors) that make up the whole.
Conversely, the claim that there is no such thing as absolute truth seems to be addressing mainly that it is difficult to fully understand and take counsel of all views involved, and still make a value judgement that is "fair" to all parties and viewpoints involved. However, that is another question entirely, because "absolute truth" is a different entity from "value judgements", even though they have the potential to intertwine and influence each other.
Confused yet? [;)]