User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 12/2/2007 2:15:32 PM EDT
[#1]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/2/2007 2:17:13 PM EDT
[#2]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/2/2007 2:17:44 PM EDT
[#3]
I don't follow. Are you asking what they are going to do with the marked items, or what they are going to further restrict.
I hope the SCOTUS ruling is positive for gun owners. If the wrong people get into office, first it will be the gun owners, then they'll disarm the police. Pretty soon the only people with guns will be the criminal. I'm not as paranoid as I seem |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/2/2007 2:19:31 PM EDT
[#4]
Yea how are they going to enforce what we already own? How are cops supposed to know the difference between post post ban and post post post ban? |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/2/2007 2:19:49 PM EDT
[#5]
If the ban is the same as the last one, I'll bet there will be some requirement for guns t be marked with dates of manufacture. That will make the current "LEO" guns legal, and ensure we can't buy newer ones.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/2/2007 2:20:27 PM EDT
[#6]
The way I see it, "we, the people" have the last word on whether or not there is to be yet another AWB. If it does come down to house to house confiscation Katrina style, I for one sure as hell won't go quietly. I'm not even sure "they'll" know how the hell to go about it. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/2/2007 2:21:42 PM EDT
[#7]
Alright that works, how about magazines? |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/2/2007 2:22:27 PM EDT
[#8]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/2/2007 2:28:00 PM EDT
[#9]
They aren't going to repeat their mistakes and pass the same AWB. Hell, you're from California--how does it work there? That's more likely how a federal ban would look. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/2/2007 2:33:33 PM EDT
[#10]
If they were smart, and I'm not counting on that, they would simply ban the sale, manufacture and transfer of greater than 10 round mags in the commercial market. Simple direct and to the point. This is of course unlikely as Congress could make a paperclip seem complicated.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/2/2007 2:33:59 PM EDT
[#11]
Be about effective as the last one too
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/2/2007 2:34:43 PM EDT
[#12]
It will be largely disregarded, like drug laws.
Violators will be raided by SWAT teams at odd hours for years following the ban. There won't be one big door-to-door. A "War on Guns" will be fought just like the "War on Drugs". Hopefully the SC will rule in favor of the obvious and we won't have to worry about this. |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/2/2007 2:39:36 PM EDT
[#13]
Works pretty much the same as any other state with the exception of fullcap mags. |
||
|
|
|
Posted: 12/2/2007 2:39:50 PM EDT
[#14]
It will be enforced, based on how its written. Which AWB are you referring to? Whats the wording in it? Does it include a grandfather clause? Ban on future manufacture alone or manufacture and possession? Etc.......................... |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/2/2007 2:42:17 PM EDT
[#15]
"If I could have gotten 51 votes in the Senate of the United States for an outright ban, picking up every one of them -- Mr. and Mrs. America, turn them all in -- I would have done it." - Sen. Dianne
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/2/2007 2:47:01 PM EDT
[#16]
Could be the exact same, date codes on the new mags, IF there is a grandfather clause. They could try to ban possession, or make us register our "pre ban" rifles and mags. Hopefully they will not succeed. |
||
|
|
|
Posted: 12/2/2007 2:47:30 PM EDT
[#17]
Another useless person from Krapafornia.. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/2/2007 2:48:53 PM EDT
[#18]
Alot of LEO mags (Glock and HK come to mind) have the 9-13-94 Restricted date on them. A new ban would probably just stamp a new date.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/2/2007 3:07:00 PM EDT
[#19]
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/2/2007 3:09:07 PM EDT
[#20]
No Loop holes this time...
No sunset... They wont drop the ball next time round   
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/2/2007 3:31:46 PM EDT
[#21]
I think IF, big IF, there is another ban, it will be like the California ban. (new rifles would not have detachable mags) No more detachable mags or evil features.
There would be a grandfather clause with some sort of registration and no sunset..they are not going to make the same mistake again....but I really don't think they will be able to get enough support to pass a ban...yet |
|
|
|
Posted: 12/3/2007 2:39:34 AM EDT
[#22]
I'm of the opinion that we can prevent it from happening again.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 12/3/2007 3:09:27 AM EDT
[#23]
"Banning guns addresses a fundamental right of all Americans to feel safe." --U.S. Sen. Dianne Feinstein Associated Press “Ms. Gun Control,” who holds a rare California concealed weapons permit. 11/18/93 |
|
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
