I was just reading a gun rag, and saw a full-page ad for the new Taser line of color-coordinated non-threatening, less-than-lethal, remote control-looking personal defense devices.
In fact, on Taser's web site, it's referred to as a
"self-defense electronic control device". Not a mention of being a weapon. Not a mention of the mindset that will be required when you will be faced with an attacker intent on robbing/raping/killing you.
Here are the features:
-
Small non-gun design-Lightweight and easy to carry
-Lithium Power Magazine is good for over 50 uses
-
Available in four designer colors-15 ft. (4.5 m) range
Here is the image from the ad:
Then we have the new, wireless 12ga shotgun Taser round. It's a self-contained mini-taser in a shotgun round. I know it's been making the rounds here, but it's another example of the technology that is being developed to provide an alternative to lethal force.
My question is, will the technology become so effective and compact that lawmakers will try to use it as an excuse to usher in civilian firearms ban legislation? After all, what kind of bloodthirsty animal would rather KILL another human when he could safely incapacitate him? Sound silly? That's the tactic they'll use. The already considerable negative stigma around firearms will increase tenfold. They'll be regarded as archaic tools of torture and death from a less enlightened time, their owners violent savages who not only were comfortable in taking lives, but delighted in it.
Just a thought.