Quoted:
Quoted: Your information about the original 13th Amendment is faulty, at best. It was not intended to bar lawyers from being in Congress or serving as President. It was also never illegally removed from the Constitution.
FYI: The Congress that proposed the original 13th Amendment you refer to, was comprised of a majority OF LAWYERS. |
Did you actually read the link? |
Alright, class time.
First of all: "esquire" is an informal title most attorneys don't even use.
Second: judges DO NOT have to be lawyers or have any qualifications at all. It's just that most are and do. (Varies state by state and the Judiciary Act can be alered at any time)
Lastly, honor. What a load of crap. If such were the case, no one with a degree of any kind could be able to include it in his name: John Smith, BA = JAIL. And no government can exist without at least some sovereign immunity. Can you imagine all US Attorneys, prosecutors, soldiers, etc. being able to be held liable for any possible mistake they make? Government would cease to function. Lawyers have been a part of government since government was created. It is just a necessary evil, so to speak. It is how we maintain functionality of government and usability of law. If we had to rely solely on those who have no legal training, laws would make no sense and would not be consistent with our legal and political tradition. The common law would be destroyed and the judiciary would spend countless hours trying to make sense of it all.