Does it seem odd to anyone else ALL the $$$ our gov't has spent on seizing pot and other recreational drugs given that just about ANYONE can own anthrax???

To my knowledge, anthrax is NOT a "controlled substance." Correct me if I am wrong.

But I don't believe there is such a thing as "recreational anthrax."

And unlike firearms, the ONLY reason for possession of Anthrax is to kill people.

Now I know it occurs naturally, but I'm wondering ....

...is outlawing Anthrax a legitimate governmental activity???

I'm the last one to advocate gov't interference, but maybe this is a good case for the gov't do do something.

Am I totally nutzoid here??

And all the mean people who have anthrax bacteria would nicely turn them over to the government as soon as it was outlawed.

Nawh...

Ya could be on to sump'n here...

db

Heck, it makes about as much sense as making pot illegal, being that it is naturally occuring and all...