Posted: 2/23/2007 4:18:06 PM EDT
This simply indicates that Chicago citizens are too stupid to raise their own kids. Who wants to propose a law to force teachers to wipe your kids ass for them too? The worst part is that people want to put the sole blame on the teachers for the problems with the educational system. Chicago Tribune LINK
By Ryan Keith Associated Press Writer Published February 23, 2007, 7:46 AM CST
SPRINGFIELD -- Rep. Mary Flowers wants to clean up Chicago schools—two germy, dirty hands at a time.
Fed up with what she sees as a health hazard for thousands of children, Flowers has introduced legislation that would require Chicago schools to make students wash their hands with antiseptic soap before eating.
The measure passed the Illinois House 100-14 Thursday without any debate. It now goes to the Senate.
"This is all about a way of life for our children," Flowers ( D-Chicago) said in a recent interview. "It's a public safety issue that needs to be addressed."
But school officials and teachers say the measure seems to reflect misplaced priorities at the state capitol. They say teachers are already doing a good job of keeping kids' hands clean for breakfast and lunch.
And one Chicago parent said promoting cleanliness among students would be a good idea, but questioned whether it deserves the attention of state lawmakers.
"I think they should be focused on the issues," said Mona Van Kenegan, a dentist for a public health clinic at a Chicago high school who has a 7-year-old in a Chicago school.
School absences because of sick kids are common, especially in the cold winter months.
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates nearly 22 million school days are lost nationwide just to the common cold, with some viruses and bacteria able to live for two hours or longer on cafeteria tables, doorknobs and desks.
Three schools in North Carolina closed for several days last week after an outbreak of flu-like symptoms decimated attendance.
The Illinois Public Health Department doesn't track similar closures here, however, and Flowers offers no specifics about the scope of the problem she's trying to address in Chicago schools.
Illinois could be heading into new territory if it approves Flowers' bill. Several federal agencies and advocacy groups say they know of no other state that requires school hand washing by law.
Handwashing For Life, a Libertyville, Ill.-based advocacy group that focuses on restaurant kitchens, says similar proposals have popped up in states such as California and Ohio but nothing was implemented.
Copyright © 2007, Chicago Tribune
|
State may add soap, water to 3 R's
By Tracy Dell'Angela Tribune staff reporter Published February 15, 2007
With all the crises that need to be addressed in Chicago's public schools, add this one to the list: germy little hands.
The Illinois House is expected to vote next week on a proposal that would require all Chicago schoolchildren to wash their hands "with antiseptic soap" before eating, and for the district to upgrade their hand-washing facilities to "nationally accepted standards."
Rep. Mary Flowers, a Chicago Democrat who first sponsored the bill in 2005 and brought it back this session, said she believes the law could save lives, or at least reduce absenteeism in city schools.
Flowers said she is limiting the proposal to apply only to Chicago schools as a starting point and is willing to expand it statewide.
Flowers said this health issue is an important priority for the legislature, which has yet to tackle the thorny issues of school-funding reform or high school dropouts.
"I've had to walk in some of these buildings and I've seen the bathrooms, and I tell you, I wouldn't want my children there," said Flowers, who said her first stab at this legislation died in committee, but it had no organized opposition. "I'm not trying to be a health fanatic. But if I couldn't wash my hands all day, I don't know what I would do. This is a medical crisis ... that needs to be addressed."
She said she is hopeful that this time the proposal will pass the House with little opposition and advance to the Senate.
No one disputes that it's important for people to wash their hands after they use the restroom and before they eat--especially in germ-incubators such as schools. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates that nearly 22 million school days are lost every year because of the common cold, and certain strains of E. coli, salmonella and other bacteria can live on surfaces like cafeteria tables and doorknobs for up to two hours.
It's also clear from observational studies that regular hand washing is far from universal. One study in the American Journal of Infection Control found that only 58 percent of female and 40 percent of male students washed their hands after using the bathroom.
But it's not so clear how the mandate would be managed or enforced.
Such a law also would present a logistical snafu at many elementary schools, because bathroom breaks are built into the school day on a staggered schedule. And who is going to enforce the law for high school students, who might resent lining up before lunch while their geometry teacher squirts a little hand sanitizer in their palms?
While the proposal was greeted by a fair share of eye rolling from teachers, they said a new hand-washing law may shame the district into ensuring that every school has sinks with hot running water, soap and paper towels. In many cases, teachers bring their own soap and sanitizer--or they put it on their school supply lists for parents to provide, along with pencils, notebooks and tissues.
Chicago Teachers Union President Marilyn Stewart won a few chortles at a delegate meeting last week when she announced this latest education legislation gaining traction in Springfield. Still, teachers fear the germ-killing mandate could represent a slippery slope. What's next, they wonder? Sanitizing desk tops? Wiping every doorknob? Pulling little fingers out of noses?
"The teachers were like, `Oh yeah, right, like we're not doing it already,'" said Stewart, who kept extra soap and sanitizer in her classroom but also was pragmatic about how quickly students get germy, even after the best scrubbing. "For this to surface at the top of the heap of crucial issues for schools, it's kind of funny. It's not even in the Top 10 of priorities."
Flowers said the cost to implement the law would be "real cheap" when offset by the savings from lower absenteeism, and she doesn't think the mandate will adversely affect school schedules.
"I understand the constraints on teachers' time, but children should be able to practice what they are taught at home," said Flowers, who has a child in the Chicago school system. "Preventing the spreading of germs and bacteria is a lifelong lesson."
It's a lesson that already gets plenty of attention in city schools, said district spokesman Michael Vaughn.
If this proposal makes Flowers seem a little germ obsessed, well, she's in good company. Politicians on both sides of the aisle--from President Bush and Vice President Cheney to Al Gore and Sen. Barack Obama--have become religious about carrying hand sanitizer.
Carlos Azcoitia, principal at Chicago's Spry Community School, who has more than 900 pupils wandering his hallways, is not one to pooh-pooh germ fighting. He expects his teachers to remind students regularly about washing their hands, and he makes sure the bathrooms are well stocked with soap and paper towels. Azcoitia says he has no option but to practice what he preaches because, as the kind of principal who likes to walk the halls greeting students, "I might shake 100 little hands all day long."
Still, he's a little baffled by the proposal.
"Let's not come up with another mandate. Let's worry about school funding first," he said.
|
|