The UN sanctions are clearly wrong and have been an utter failure.
A prominent member of our Presbyterian Church is an Iraqi. He’s lived here with his family for quite some years. He has family there and travels to Iraq perhaps 6-8 times a year, sponsoring cargo planes full of food, clothing, and medicine.
Here’s the deal. The sanctions do not affect Saddam. All they do is punish the people, which in the end, results in more Anti-US sentiment. I know the sanctions were imposed to pressure Saddam into complying with inspections, etc., but the only way sanctions can work is if:
1. The guy at the top is a semi-reasonable man and has the best interests of his people in mind.
2. The people have the power to overthrow the guy and install a new government.
In the case of Iraq, neither case is true. The people do not have the power to overthrow Saddam and Saddam obviously could care less about his own people. They starve, can’t get medicine, etc., while he lives in the same fashion he has always lived.
This policy is a failure because you cannot pressure a guy like that.
We have three choices:
1. We drop the sanctions and let the guy sell his oil (which is not in our best interests).
2. We go in, kill the SOB and install a new govt. (which will cause the rest of the Muslim world to hate us).
3. We continue the sanctions and only the Iraqis will hate us (swell).
These are tough choices here. I vote for #2 because now we have a clear reason to do so. If the money trail leads to Saddam, we will have our mandate.