Why are the Lefties now saying "Bush was not ...

[ARCHIVED THREAD] - Why are the Lefties now saying "Bush was not ...

Posted: 9/14/2001 5:07:34 PM EDT

"Bush was not elected but was appointed by the US Supreme Court"?
I thought that the SCOTUS only decided that the Florida ballot or vote was valid. What am I missing?

Posted: 9/14/2001 5:08:49 PM EDT

[#1]

Who the fuck is dredging that crap back up at this time?

Aviator [img]www.dredgeearthfirst.com/aviator.gif[/img]

Posted: 9/14/2001 5:14:09 PM EDT

[#2]

I just saw something in the paper about one of the Supreme Court justices claiming that if he had more time "Bush wouldn't be president". Apparently he thought he could sway Sandra O'Conner.
Then I go see what that wacky chess player, Sam Sloan, has to say about Fischer playing online chess games and Wham! There's that sh*t again!

Posted: 9/14/2001 7:08:14 PM EDT

[#3]

Anyone? In a nutshell please?

Posted: 9/14/2001 7:14:58 PM EDT

[#4]

Because their followers want to hear it.

Posted: 9/14/2001 7:43:54 PM EDT

[#5]

The supposedly impartial collegiate reviewers (which I believe to be lefties) continued the research after-the-fact. Their results indicated that a full and detailed recount of the votes would actually benifit Bush and not whats his face. Ironically each side was fighting for the wrong thing. In either case, Bush was the winner. All this stuff being drug up now is propaganda BS by the libs.

[ARCHIVED THREAD] - Why are the Lefties now saying "Bush was not ...

General » General Discussion

Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.

Warning

Confirm Action

About AR15.COM

Stay Connected

Newsletter

Contact Us