Why does the AW ban target "assault rifles"

General » General Discussion

[ARCHIVED THREAD] - Why does the AW ban target "assault rifles" (Page 1 of 2)

Posted: 4/14/2006 4:16:27 PM EDT

Why do they do that? Handguns are used in more crimes and so are shotguns.

Just a thought.

Posted: 4/14/2006 4:17:12 PM EDT

[#1]

because they are scary and typically black. you see, liberals are racist

Posted: 4/14/2006 4:17:50 PM EDT

[#2]

Probably going to target .50 cal and above too...

Posted: 4/14/2006 4:19:12 PM EDT

[#3]

Handguns and shotguns should be banned too.

Posted: 4/14/2006 4:19:33 PM EDT

[#4]

Because there's a ~50/50 chance that Joe Citizen owns or has fired a handgun, and <1/1,000,000 chance he owns or has fired an EBR. An attack on handguns hits too close to too many people who (dumbasses that they are) are willing to sit on the sidelines as long as it isn't their ox being gored.

Posted: 4/14/2006 4:22:11 PM EDT

[#5]

What AWB?

The prior AWB did NOT target assault rifles. It created a bogus term "semiautomatic assault weapons", a term that no longer exists except in a few states, and targeted our semiautomatic rifles.

The term was created in order to cause confusion between our Sport Utility/Homeland Defense rifles and assault rifles. It worked real well as even members of this board don't know the fucking difference.

Posted: 4/14/2006 4:30:50 PM EDT

[#6]

What we need is a invasion on American soil while all our troops are some where else. So the American people can show how important it is to have such weapons.

Posted: 4/14/2006 4:31:54 PM EDT

[#7]

Quoted:
What we need is a invasion on American soil while all our troops are some where else. So the American people can show how important it is to have such weapons.

brilliant! a bunch of overweight internet commandouches with semi autos up against a trained army.

habla "slaughter"?

Posted: 4/14/2006 4:34:20 PM EDT

[#8]

Quoted:
Quoted:
What we need is a invasion on American soil while all our troops are some where else. So the American people can show how important it is to have such weapons.

brilliant! a bunch of overweight internet commandouches with semi autos up against a trained army.

habla "slaughter"?

the largest military in the world is china, who can muster maybe 5million warm bodies. couple that with 250million+ guns in the US, and even if that averages to 10 guns per person that's still a 25million person force. the slaughter would be on the enemy side

Posted: 4/14/2006 4:35:19 PM EDT

[#9]

Everyone knows most armed robberies and murders occur when a perp has an AR-15/AK-47 from about 300 yards out or so.

Posted: 4/14/2006 4:36:02 PM EDT

[#10]

Quoted:
Quoted:
What we need is a invasion on American soil while all our troops are some where else. So the American people can show how important it is to have such weapons.

brilliant! a bunch of overweight internet commandouches with semi autos up against a trained army.

habla "slaughter"?

....not this Jarhead!

Posted: 4/14/2006 4:36:20 PM EDT

[#11]

Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
What we need is a invasion on American soil while all our troops are some where else. So the American people can show how important it is to have such weapons.

brilliant! a bunch of overweight internet commandouches with semi autos up against a trained army.

habla "slaughter"?

the largest military in the world is china, who can muster maybe 5million warm bodies. couple that with 250million+ guns in the US, and even if that averages to 10 guns per person that's still a 25million person force. the slaughter would be on the enemy side

Trouble is, 15 mill of those gun owners would get in their Hummers, Expeditions, etc and flee to Canada or the 'safe' zone of the US.

Posted: 4/14/2006 4:37:11 PM EDT

[#12]

Because the liberal socialist wannabe overlords are pussies and before they go into the build the camps and start the killing mode they have to make sure the means of resistance are removed from the hands of the sheeple.

Posted: 4/14/2006 4:38:09 PM EDT

[#13]

Quoted:

Trouble is, 15 mill of those gun owners would get in their Hummers, Expeditions, etc and flee to Canada or the 'safe' zone of the US.

that's why i don't have a "bugout vehicle/kit" like some of the chickenshits around here. my guns are part of the active defense of this nation during times of peace and war

Posted: 4/14/2006 4:39:11 PM EDT

[#14]

Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
What we need is a invasion on American soil while all our troops are some where else. So the American people can show how important it is to have such weapons.

brilliant! a bunch of overweight internet commandouches with semi autos up against a trained army.

habla "slaughter"?

....not this Jarhead!

....Not this Uber-Pretty Girlyman!!

Posted: 4/14/2006 4:40:21 PM EDT

[#15]

Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
What we need is a invasion on American soil while all our troops are some where else. So the American people can show how important it is to have such weapons.

brilliant! a bunch of overweight internet commandouches with semi autos up against a trained army.

habla "slaughter"?

the largest military in the world is china, who can muster maybe 5million warm bodies. couple that with 250million+ guns in the US, and even if that averages to 10 guns per person that's still a 25million person force. the slaughter would be on the enemy side

how? with human wave attacks on tanks supported by mechanized infantry and artillery? the chinese tried this in Korea and got their asses kicked.

Posted: 4/14/2006 4:40:32 PM EDT

[#16]

Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
What we need is a invasion on American soil while all our troops are some where else. So the American people can show how important it is to have such weapons.

brilliant! a bunch of overweight internet commandouches with semi autos up against a trained army.

habla "slaughter"?

the largest military in the world is china, who can muster maybe 5million warm bodies. couple that with 250million+ guns in the US, and even if that averages to 10 guns per person that's still a 25million person force. the slaughter would be on the enemy side

That's 5 million regular/active reserve troops. I believe they have a "youth brigade" something like a national guard force of 25 million volunteers. Plus, if they implemented a draft of able-bodied males, they can easily pull another 100 million or so.

Check out this link. Chinese Military Strengths

Posted: 4/14/2006 4:41:29 PM EDT

[#17]

Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
What we need is a invasion on American soil while all our troops are some where else. So the American people can show how important it is to have such weapons.

brilliant! a bunch of overweight internet commandouches with semi autos up against a trained army.

habla "slaughter"?

....not this Jarhead!

you're in the minority. as are combat arms veterans who might actually be worth a shit in that situation.

Posted: 4/14/2006 4:45:03 PM EDT

[#18]

ANTI-GUNNERS and the AWB never actually did anything to regulate REAL Assault Rifles. Assault Rifles by defintion have the ability to fire full-auto. Assault Rifles are already regulated though NFA.

THE MAIN REASON the anti-gunners used the "Assault Weapon" lingo was to add the word semi-automatic to the front of it.

Semi-automatic Assault Rifle just sound evil. It is also a OXYMORON. An assault rifle is not a
asault rifle if it is a semi-ONLY rifle.

But the TRUTH DOES NOT MATTER. The ANTI-GUNNERS were sucessful with the attempts
to combine the two words.

Just think about how many times you have heard the term Semi-auto Assault Weapon or
actually called a AR-15 an Assault Rifle. They even convinced us...

LB

Posted: 4/14/2006 4:48:11 PM EDT

[#19]

TRH, I think you badly underestimate the contribution that armed Americans would be in that situation. There are many instances of armed citizens backing up the police, and at times dealing with the situation successfully when authorities could not or before authorities could arrive there. These occurances range from the founding of the cournty up to modern times. I won't cite them, I bet you know many of them as well as I do.

Also, the WWII Japanese leadership had respect for armed Americans, the "rifle behind every blade of grass" quote was real.

Posted: 4/14/2006 4:51:31 PM EDT

[#20]

Quoted:
TRH, I think you badly underestimate the contribution that armed Americans would be in that situation. There are many instances of armed citizens backing up the police, and at times dealing with the situation successfully when authorities could not or before authorities could arrive there. These occurances range from the founding of the cournty up to modern times. I won't cite them, I bet you know many of them as well as I do.

Also, the WWII Japanese leadership had respect for armed Americans, the "rifle behind every blade of grass" quote was real.

my fear is that if for some reason the chinese get ballsy enough to invade, they arent going to leave the tanks at home. I dont know about you, but I'm kinda short in the anti tank weapon department.

Posted: 4/14/2006 4:54:11 PM EDT

[#21]

Quoted:
Quoted:
TRH, I think you badly underestimate the contribution that armed Americans would be in that situation. There are many instances of armed citizens backing up the police, and at times dealing with the situation successfully when authorities could not or before authorities could arrive there. These occurances range from the founding of the cournty up to modern times. I won't cite them, I bet you know many of them as well as I do.

Also, the WWII Japanese leadership had respect for armed Americans, the "rifle behind every blade of grass" quote was real.

my fear is that if for some reason the chinese get ballsy enough to invade, they arent going to leave the tanks at home. I dont know about you, but I'm kinda short in the anti tank weapon department.

that is what chem majors are for(to make explosives that will make the IEDs in Iraq look like child;s play).

Posted: 4/14/2006 4:56:45 PM EDT

[#22]

Quoted:
Quoted:
TRH, I think you badly underestimate the contribution that armed Americans would be in that situation. There are many instances of armed citizens backing up the police, and at times dealing with the situation successfully when authorities could not or before authorities could arrive there. These occurances range from the founding of the cournty up to modern times. I won't cite them, I bet you know many of them as well as I do.

Also, the WWII Japanese leadership had respect for armed Americans, the "rifle behind every blade of grass" quote was real.

my fear is that if for some reason the chinese get ballsy enough to invade, they arent going to leave the tanks at home. I dont know about you, but I'm kinda short in the anti tank weapon department.

I think the Navy would not let a Chinese warship with tanks or anything within 2000 miles of our shore.

Posted: 4/14/2006 4:58:07 PM EDT

[#23]

Quoted:
Quoted:
TRH, I think you badly underestimate the contribution that armed Americans would be in that situation. There are many instances of armed citizens backing up the police, and at times dealing with the situation successfully when authorities could not or before authorities could arrive there. These occurances range from the founding of the cournty up to modern times. I won't cite them, I bet you know many of them as well as I do.

Also, the WWII Japanese leadership had respect for armed Americans, the "rifle behind every blade of grass" quote was real.

my fear is that if for some reason the chinese get ballsy enough to invade, they arent going to leave the tanks at home. I dont know about you, but I'm kinda short in the anti tank weapon department.

We will need to raid the armory and take all the AT4s. Tanks arn't anything to worry about. They are attacking im sure I have a few ideas.

Ever see brave heart? We poor some gas along where they are attacking and burn them.

I do believe we will be killing them and be able to take a few of there tanks and there anti-tank missiles and guns.

You need to get creative.

Posted: 4/14/2006 5:00:33 PM EDT

[#24]

Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
TRH, I think you badly underestimate the contribution that armed Americans would be in that situation. There are many instances of armed citizens backing up the police, and at times dealing with the situation successfully when authorities could not or before authorities could arrive there. These occurances range from the founding of the cournty up to modern times. I won't cite them, I bet you know many of them as well as I do.

Also, the WWII Japanese leadership had respect for armed Americans, the "rifle behind every blade of grass" quote was real.

my fear is that if for some reason the chinese get ballsy enough to invade, they arent going to leave the tanks at home. I dont know about you, but I'm kinda short in the anti tank weapon department.

I think the Navy would not let a Chinese warship with tanks or anything within 2000 miles of our shore.

which doesnt do a lick of good against ZBD2000 airborne infantry fighting vehicles(similar to the BMD-3 that the Russians have)

Posted: 4/14/2006 5:00:51 PM EDT

[#25]

Because black guns are spooooooky!

Posted: 4/14/2006 5:01:25 PM EDT

[#26]

Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
TRH, I think you badly underestimate the contribution that armed Americans would be in that situation. There are many instances of armed citizens backing up the police, and at times dealing with the situation successfully when authorities could not or before authorities could arrive there. These occurances range from the founding of the cournty up to modern times. I won't cite them, I bet you know many of them as well as I do.

Also, the WWII Japanese leadership had respect for armed Americans, the "rifle behind every blade of grass" quote was real.

my fear is that if for some reason the chinese get ballsy enough to invade, they arent going to leave the tanks at home. I dont know about you, but I'm kinda short in the anti tank weapon department.

We will need to raid the armory and take all the AT4s. Tanks arn't anything to worry about. They are attacking im sure I have a few ideas.

Ever see brave heart? We poor some gas along where they are attacking and burn them.

I do believe we will be killing them and be able to take a few of there tanks and there anti-tank missiles and guns.

You need to get creative.

you go take on a type 99 main battle tank with a little AT4, go ahead, I dare ya!

Posted: 4/14/2006 5:02:18 PM EDT

[#27]

Cesium a peace about the size of a basket ball is powerful enough to take out a football field.

1 peice of Cesium+1 feild or road with a pot hole+ a rainy night = Good bye tanks.

Posted: 4/14/2006 5:03:23 PM EDT

[#28]

Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
TRH, I think you badly underestimate the contribution that armed Americans would be in that situation. There are many instances of armed citizens backing up the police, and at times dealing with the situation successfully when authorities could not or before authorities could arrive there. These occurances range from the founding of the cournty up to modern times. I won't cite them, I bet you know many of them as well as I do.

Also, the WWII Japanese leadership had respect for armed Americans, the "rifle behind every blade of grass" quote was real.

my fear is that if for some reason the chinese get ballsy enough to invade, they arent going to leave the tanks at home. I dont know about you, but I'm kinda short in the anti tank weapon department.

I think the Navy would not let a Chinese warship with tanks or anything within 2000 miles of our shore.

which doesnt do a lick of good against ZBD2000 airborne infantry fighting vehicles(similar to the BMD-3 that the Russians have)

I think nukes would be flying in both directions long before Chinese tanks are driving down Main St. USA. I worry more about New Orleans type situations way before that.

Posted: 4/14/2006 5:03:30 PM EDT

[#29]

Quoted:
Why does the AW ban target "assault rifles"

cause they are all ASSHOLES!

Posted: 4/14/2006 5:04:45 PM EDT

[#30]

Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
TRH, I think you badly underestimate the contribution that armed Americans would be in that situation. There are many instances of armed citizens backing up the police, and at times dealing with the situation successfully when authorities could not or before authorities could arrive there. These occurances range from the founding of the cournty up to modern times. I won't cite them, I bet you know many of them as well as I do.

Also, the WWII Japanese leadership had respect for armed Americans, the "rifle behind every blade of grass" quote was real.

my fear is that if for some reason the chinese get ballsy enough to invade, they arent going to leave the tanks at home. I dont know about you, but I'm kinda short in the anti tank weapon department.

We will need to raid the armory and take all the AT4s. Tanks arn't anything to worry about. They are attacking im sure I have a few ideas.

Ever see brave heart? We poor some gas along where they are attacking and burn them.

I do believe we will be killing them and be able to take a few of there tanks and there anti-tank missiles and guns.

You need to get creative.

you go take on a type 99 main battle tank with a little AT4, go ahead, I dare ya!

I plan on using more then one and a AT4 is very powerful.

14inchs of armor. Plus the tanks are made in china. I would have no problem firing that thing at 250 meters. AT4 Enjoy

Posted: 4/14/2006 5:05:14 PM EDT

[#31]

Quoted:
I think nukes would be flying in both directions long before Chinese tanks are driving down Main St. USA. I worry more about New Orleans type situations way before that.

the thread originator wasnt talking about NO stuff, just a theoretical invasion. I was pointing out that many members of this board would do some really foolish stuff if faced with an invasion force. it is incredibly unlikely that it will happen though. but yeah, standard NOLA and LA riots type of feces on the air mover is the most likely problem

Posted: 4/14/2006 5:07:08 PM EDT

[#32]

Quoted:
I plan on using more then one and a AT4 is very powerful.

14inchs of armor. Plus the tanks are made in china. I would have no problem firing that thing at 250 meters. AT4 Enjoy

ever fire one before? I've shot a few of them, it is more difficult than it looks. I also wouldnt expect it to knock out a tank even if you live long enough after the tanks start hosing your launch site down with coax to get a second or third off. the launch signature of those things is pretty big.

Posted: 4/14/2006 5:10:23 PM EDT

[#33]

Quoted:
Quoted:
I plan on using more then one and a AT4 is very powerful.

14inchs of armor. Plus the tanks are made in china. I would have no problem firing that thing at 250 meters. AT4 Enjoy

ever fire one before? I've shot a few of them, it is more difficult than it looks. I also wouldnt expect it to knock out a tank even if you live long enough after the tanks start hosing your launch site down with coax to get a second or third off. the launch signature of those things is pretty big.

Yeah I know people will be to much of a pussy to help out. So I will be the only one firing one. Also I plan on runing my ass off after firing. Plus they arn't the united states army they are some china army with made in china toys. Plus I plan on firing it from a roof top or some where like that maybe a window.

Posted: 4/14/2006 5:10:45 PM EDT

[#34]

Even though they perform the same function as every firearm does, they look scarier doing it.

BTW: I'm 24, 6'3" 220lb, and can bench my weight, run 1.5 miles in about 11 min (maybe not land speed record time...but you still got to be in decent shape to do it.)

Posted: 4/14/2006 5:12:52 PM EDT

[#35]

Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I plan on using more then one and a AT4 is very powerful.

14inchs of armor. Plus the tanks are made in china. I would have no problem firing that thing at 250 meters. AT4 Enjoy

ever fire one before? I've shot a few of them, it is more difficult than it looks. I also wouldnt expect it to knock out a tank even if you live long enough after the tanks start hosing your launch site down with coax to get a second or third off. the launch signature of those things is pretty big.

Yeah I know people will be to much of a pussy to help out. So I will be the only one firing one. Also I plan on runing my ass off after firing. Plus they arn't the united states army they are some china army with made in china toys. Plus I plan on firing it from a roof top or some where like that maybe a window.

so you've never used one before huh? ok you go be the hero and take on a battalion of chicom armor single handedly with your pile of trusty AT4 rockets that you dont have access to

Posted: 4/14/2006 5:18:53 PM EDT

[#36]

Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I plan on using more then one and a AT4 is very powerful.

14inchs of armor. Plus the tanks are made in china. I would have no problem firing that thing at 250 meters. AT4 Enjoy

ever fire one before? I've shot a few of them, it is more difficult than it looks. I also wouldnt expect it to knock out a tank even if you live long enough after the tanks start hosing your launch site down with coax to get a second or third off. the launch signature of those things is pretty big.

Yeah I know people will be to much of a pussy to help out. So I will be the only one firing one. Also I plan on runing my ass off after firing. Plus they arn't the united states army they are some china army with made in china toys. Plus I plan on firing it from a roof top or some where like that maybe a window.

so you've never used one before huh? ok you go be the hero and take on a battalion of chicom armor single handedly with your pile of trusty AT4 rockets that you dont have access to

Well the ods of me getting the AT4s are about the same as the ods of china invading with the american military sitting on the asses.

Posted: 4/14/2006 5:19:46 PM EDT

[#37]

Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I plan on using more then one and a AT4 is very powerful.

14inchs of armor. Plus the tanks are made in china. I would have no problem firing that thing at 250 meters. AT4 Enjoy

ever fire one before? I've shot a few of them, it is more difficult than it looks. I also wouldnt expect it to knock out a tank even if you live long enough after the tanks start hosing your launch site down with coax to get a second or third off. the launch signature of those things is pretty big.

Yeah I know people will be to much of a pussy to help out. So I will be the only one firing one. Also I plan on runing my ass off after firing. Plus they arn't the united states army they are some china army with made in china toys. Plus I plan on firing it from a roof top or some where like that maybe a window.

so you've never used one before huh? ok you go be the hero and take on a battalion of chicom armor single handedly with your pile of trusty AT4 rockets that you dont have access to

Well the ods of me getting the AT4s are about the same as the ods of china invading with the american military sitting on the asses.

O, yeah i was hoping canada was going to invade. With there "Military"

Posted: 4/14/2006 5:22:57 PM EDT

[#38]

Because they cannot get rid of ALL GUNS at once.

So they have to do them in groups...

Assault Weapons

Saturday Night Specials

Armor Piercing Capable

Sniper Rifles

Etc. Etc.

When they finally have us all down to Skeet Shotguns it will be too late.

Posted: 4/14/2006 5:23:26 PM EDT

[#39]

Quoted:
O, yeah i was hoping canada was going to invade. With there "Military"

that's not even fair, to stop a canadian assault(with their beady little eyes and flapping heads!) you just need to find some ice, and throw them some hockey sticks and a puck.

Posted: 4/14/2006 5:24:20 PM EDT

[#40]

Quoted:
Quoted:
O, yeah i was hoping canada was going to invade. With there "Military"

that's not even fair, to stop a canadian assault(with their beady little eyes and flapping heads!) you just need to find some ice, and throw them some hockey sticks and a puck.

Or just talk like them and sat "Eeeh"!!!

Posted: 4/14/2006 7:11:56 PM EDT

[#41]

Quoted:
ANTI-GUNNERS and the AWB never actually did anything to regulate REAL Assault Rifles. Assault Rifles by defintion have the ability to fire full-auto. Assault Rifles are already regulated though NFA.

THE MAIN REASON the anti-gunners used the "Assault Weapon" lingo was to add the word semi-automatic to the front of it.

Semi-automatic Assault Rifle just sound evil. It is also a OXYMORON. An assault rifle is not a
asault rifle if it is a semi-ONLY rifle.

But the TRUTH DOES NOT MATTER. The ANTI-GUNNERS were sucessful with the attempts
to combine the two words.

Just think about how many times you have heard the term Semi-auto Assault Weapon or
actually called a AR-15 an Assault Rifle. They even convinced us...

LB

Damn. Even the dumbass gun grabbers did not call it a Semi-automatic Assault Rifle!

Posted: 4/14/2006 7:13:11 PM EDT

[#42]

Quoted:
Quoted:
ANTI-GUNNERS and the AWB never actually did anything to regulate REAL Assault Rifles. Assault Rifles by defintion have the ability to fire full-auto. Assault Rifles are already regulated though NFA.

THE MAIN REASON the anti-gunners used the "Assault Weapon" lingo was to add the word semi-automatic to the front of it.

Semi-automatic Assault Rifle just sound evil. It is also a OXYMORON. An assault rifle is not a
asault rifle if it is a semi-ONLY rifle.

But the TRUTH DOES NOT MATTER. The ANTI-GUNNERS were sucessful with the attempts
to combine the two words.

Just think about how many times you have heard the term Semi-auto Assault Weapon or
actually called a AR-15 an Assault Rifle. They even convinced us...

LB

Damn. Even the dumbass gun grabbers did not call it a Semi-automatic Assault Rifle!

I call it a lead hose with a 30 round bullet stick. What do you call your gun a Assault rifle ahahahhaa.

Posted: 4/14/2006 7:19:03 PM EDT

[#43]

Quoted:
Why do they do that? Handguns are used in more crimes and so are shotguns.

Just a thought.

The "original" Fed AWB did hit shotties and handguns. Were you [sleep}?

Remember "pre ban" mag tube extensions, folding stocks and >10 round mags for pistols?

The Antis will hit whatever, whenever. EBR's were a means to an end.

Posted: 4/14/2006 7:20:22 PM EDT

[#44]

Quoted:
Why do they do that? Handguns are used in more crimes and so are shotguns.

Just a thought.

Logic need not apply

Posted: 4/14/2006 7:28:06 PM EDT

[#45]

Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I plan on using more then one and a AT4 is very powerful.

14inchs of armor. Plus the tanks are made in china. I would have no problem firing that thing at 250 meters. AT4 Enjoy

ever fire one before? I've shot a few of them, it is more difficult than it looks. I also wouldnt expect it to knock out a tank even if you live long enough after the tanks start hosing your launch site down with coax to get a second or third off. the launch signature of those things is pretty big.

Yeah I know people will be to much of a pussy to help out. So I will be the only one firing one. Also I plan on runing my ass off after firing. Plus they arn't the united states army they are some china army with made in china toys. Plus I plan on firing it from a roof top or some where like that maybe a window.

Then they will send a HE round at ya. Try and run away from that.

Posted: 4/14/2006 7:29:45 PM EDT

[#46]

Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I plan on using more then one and a AT4 is very powerful.

14inchs of armor. Plus the tanks are made in china. I would have no problem firing that thing at 250 meters. AT4 Enjoy

ever fire one before? I've shot a few of them, it is more difficult than it looks. I also wouldnt expect it to knock out a tank even if you live long enough after the tanks start hosing your launch site down with coax to get a second or third off. the launch signature of those things is pretty big.

Yeah I know people will be to much of a pussy to help out. So I will be the only one firing one. Also I plan on runing my ass off after firing. Plus they arn't the united states army they are some china army with made in china toys. Plus I plan on firing it from a roof top or some where like that maybe a window.

Then they will send a HE round at ya. Try and run away from that.

I have a felling they would miss. As we all know anything made in china is crap. Anything made in Russia is inaccurate. There tanks are a combo of Russia and China parts so.

Posted: 4/14/2006 7:30:32 PM EDT

[#47]

Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
I plan on using more then one and a AT4 is very powerful.

14inchs of armor. Plus the tanks are made in china. I would have no problem firing that thing at 250 meters. AT4 Enjoy

ever fire one before? I've shot a few of them, it is more difficult than it looks. I also wouldnt expect it to knock out a tank even if you live long enough after the tanks start hosing your launch site down with coax to get a second or third off. the launch signature of those things is pretty big.

Yeah I know people will be to much of a pussy to help out. So I will be the only one firing one. Also I plan on runing my ass off after firing. Plus they arn't the united states army they are some china army with made in china toys. Plus I plan on firing it from a roof top or some where like that maybe a window.

Then they will send a HE round at ya. Try and run away from that.

Neo did in The Matrix...

Posted: 4/14/2006 7:31:59 PM EDT

[#48]

Quoted:

I have a felling they would miss. As we all know anything made in china is crap. Anything made in Russia is inaccurate. There tanks are a combo of Russia and China parts so.

Posted: 4/14/2006 7:35:23 PM EDT

[#49]

Why do they do that? Handguns are used in more crimes and so are shotguns.

Exactly. The antigunners, like the commies, have always been good at long term goals, one step at a time to reach that goal. They have always stated their goals, total confiscation of civilian firearms. Pass the first gun law, tighten it up, tighten some more, pass the next one, and the next.

So, they ban a type of gun that they can get widespread support for because (1) relatively few people own "assault weapons", and (2) they were easy to demonize due to appearance. Ignorance of lawmakers and the average soccermom helped in this.

Then they could come back and say, "Now we need to get rid of handguns... we have already banned those baby killing evil assault weapons. But handguns kill far more people than assault weapons. It is just common sense to ban those, too."

Next, of course, will be "high-power sniper rifles". Anything with a scope. Like the ones our troops slaughter innocent freedom fighters in Iraq. Ban those for the children.

And then it will be "street sweepers", which will be redefined as any shotgun. Shotguns, of course, will be the new "weapon of choice of criminals" just like in England, because they can't get anything else. And any fool can hack the barrel off with a common hacksaw to make it "easily concealable". Ban them, too.

Then the Democrats will remove their masks and be seen for the Communists they really are. Surprise!

Posted: 4/14/2006 7:36:41 PM EDT

[#50]

Quoted:
Quoted:

I have a felling they would miss. As we all know anything made in china is crap. Anything made in Russia is inaccurate. There tanks are a combo of Russia and China parts so.

Edit: 52 posts thats enough tommrow I will have something good worth while to talk about.

[ARCHIVED THREAD] - Why does the AW ban target "assault rifles" (Page 1 of 2)

General » General Discussion

Warning

Confirm Action

About AR15.COM

Stay Connected

Newsletter

Contact Us