Quoted: I remember thinking when these things came out.
While I can *sorta* get the whole "same manual of arms to an 870" thing, I can't help but think that's more of a marketing droid tag line to foist this on clueless Chiefs and bean counters. I'd shudder to think of myself in a situation where I'd have to bet my life on PUMP rifle with a GHOST RING sight. I'd choose my SKS over that in a heartbeat.
The department that's so fucking PC that they'd choose this POS over an AR is one that has bigger problems.
I guess there are some non-LEO's that would buy it in states with "assault weapons" bans, but even *I* wasn't that desperate in California (my M1A Scout was my primary SHTF rifle).
|
You danced right around the real issue, and nearly hit it, but not quite.
It's commonality of function with the well-regarded 870 is a good thing, but it's not the real reason.
You want to know why these things even exist? Remington has found a market for agencies that are PC. The EBRs scare the shit out of people. Hell, people on this very board raised pure hell in the thread about officers wearing BDU's and anything but shiny, polyester uniforms with spi-shined shoes. This attitude seems to be quite in line with many in the country.
Along those lines, the people do NOT want to see their friendly local police officer carrying an AR-15, no matter it's usefulness, just as they don't want to see that officer wearing OD or dark blue BDus with a badge emblem sewn on. EBRs scare the folks, and the administrators know that. This has more of the "sporting gun" look, while still giving the same down range performance as the AR.
I think it's good, in that there are some chickenshit administrators that are allowing these weapons, where they would vehemently deny the officers EBRs. I still think it's bullshit, though, that these people are in charge of "protecting" us, even though they're fucking scared of the look of a gun.