We're in the process of buying a new house. This house is 30 years old, but has been EXTREMELY well maintained. And it's not like they just prettied it up to sell it... I've driven past this house every day for the past 9 years, and it always looks like this. The inside is similarly well-kept. The current owners are a retired couple who have nothing better to do than work on the house, and they are absolutely meticulous about it.
When we bought our current house, we had inspections done, and it was a complete waste of money. For example, an electrical outlet didn't work, a toilet was leaking, and there was some foundation settling. None of these things were found by the inspection people, but were discovered by us later. In other words, it really was a waste of money.
At the time, I knew absolutely nothing about how homes were built. Since then, I've built an office addition, and done projects like moved outlets, installed supply and drain plumbing in the wall, added track lighting, replaced aluminum wire with copper, etc., plus have done two rounds of flood repairs that involved gutting from 4ft. down. While I'm certainly no expert, I think I'm familiar enough with home construction to be capable of inspecting this new house myself.
Or am I? If this is absolutely, positively, unequivocally a BAD idea, I'm welcome to comments. Though I'm much more knowledgeable about this stuff now than I was 9 years ago, I've never "inspected" a house before.
The house is, as I mentioned, 30 years old. It's 2 stories, and is built on a slab. The roof is about 5 years old and looks good (from the ground at least). The A/C is the original, and although it works now, we expect to have to replace it in the next couple of years. A termite inspection certificate will be provided by the sellers.
If I do choose to inspect this house myself, what should I look for? Or, is the very fact that I'm asking this question a sign that I should not even consider doing it myself?
--Mike