There'd be ZERO antigun senators. With no senators, nothing the pres or Representatives tried to do (anti gun legislation) would have a chance. In fact, in return for our senator's votes on other laws, we could get ALL gun laws repealed. 60 mill x $100 each is 6 billion dollars. We start with the biggies, like Kennady, Shumer, etc, and after we prove that we can get their own parties to not nominate them for reelection, the rest will run like the sheep that they are.
$100 a year is 30c a day. I could take 30c out of your pocket every day, and you'd never notice. The first election, 1 3rd of the 36 billion $ total would probably suffice, spend the rest of it getting short range, fast, concealed .22lr matches, women only, become more publicized than women's golf and tennis put-together. When everyone knows some pretty single woman who is a competitor at such matches, the antigun stuff will go where it belongs. When gals can make a living shooting such matches, teaching such shooting to other women, you can bet that 10x as many men will be doing likewise, using .45's of course.