California Court: Public Urination Illegal -- Drug Search Afterward Legal
Updated: March 10th, 2006 01:54 PM EDT
BOB EGELKO
The San Francisco Chronicle
It's a crime in California to urinate in a public place, a state appeals court ruled Wednesday.
The case before the court came from Berkeley, where a police officer detained a man urinating in the parking lot of a closed restaurant on San Pablo Avenue near Ashby Avenue one Sunday morning in January 2003. The officer searched David McDonald and found drugs.
McDonald was charged with possessing cocaine base, convicted and placed on probation. But if he hadn't been committing a crime in the first place, the search would have been illegal and the drugs the officer found couldn't be used against him.
Defining the crime posed some difficulty for prosecutors who had to justify McDonald's detention to a judge. A state law makes it an infraction --
a minor offense similar to a traffic ticket -- to answer the call of nature on BART, a Muni bus or any other public transportation vehicle. But no law expressly prohibits urinating in any other public area.
The prosecutor and Judge David Krashna of Alameda County Superior Court concluded that the detention was legal because McDonald could have been found guilty of littering. The three-judge Court of Appeal panel in San Francisco upheld the detention but disagreed with the reasoning, saying the law defines litter as "waste matter ordinarily carried on or about the person.''
Instead, the court turned to a 19th century law that makes it a crime to commit a public nuisance, defined as an act that is "injurious to health, or is indecent, or offensive to the senses.''
The act must also interfere with "the comfortable enjoyment of life or property'' by a community, or a neighborhood, or "any considerable number of persons.''
What McDonald was doing fit the bill, the court said, noting that "behavior that would be arguably less offensive to the senses'' has been classified as a nuisance.
For example, the judges said, a 1933 ruling upheld the conviction of a beer hall owner for maintaining a public nuisance because drunken crowds used offensive language that could be heard from the street.
However, the criteria spelled out in the nuisance law might not always apply to urinating in the great outdoors, the court said. For example, "a hiker responding to an irrepressible call of nature in an isolated area in the backwoods cannot reasonably be seen as interfering with any right common to the public.''
But in a more populated area, the same conduct "involves an interference with the public's right to a 'decent society' and to the use of the streets,'' Presiding Justice J. Anthony Kline said in the 3-0 decision.
McDonald's lawyer, Alan Siraco, declined to comment, saying he hadn't read the ruling.
Strange. Although search incident to arrest is lawfull, its long been held it must only be incident to a Custodial arrest. Meaning you cant search somebody who you plan to issue a citation to, "incident to arrest", only those who you are intending to trasport to jail for booking.