Uh oh, according to a magazine test I'm a 4 dating a 9

General » General Discussion

Site Notices

[ARCHIVED THREAD] - Uh oh, according to a magazine test I'm a 4 dating a 9

Posted: 3/10/2006 3:35:45 AM EDT

Posted: 3/10/2006 3:49:42 AM EDT

[#1]

Mama always said "Reach for the stars, Johnny, reach for the stars...."

Posted: 3/10/2006 3:50:57 AM EDT

[#2]

There are surgical procedures, and a ton of medicines (I get emails about them all the time) that can help with that whole "4" problem.

Posted: 3/10/2006 3:52:47 AM EDT

[#3]

and the problem is....

Posted: 3/10/2006 3:57:02 AM EDT

[#4]

Quoted:
and the problem is....

HERS!

Posted: 3/10/2006 4:01:39 AM EDT

[#5]

Quoted:
Quoted:
and the problem is....

HERS!

\

I can live with that

Posted: 3/10/2006 4:02:54 AM EDT

[#6]

Quoted:
Quoted:
and the problem is....

HERS!

so true!!!!

No Expert

Posted: 3/10/2006 4:22:34 AM EDT

[#7]

Remember, those tests are devised by women for women. You are a male, that means you already have two strikes against you.

Time to metro-up. Get the pink oxford out of the closet & put on some colonge.

Posted: 3/10/2006 4:27:26 AM EDT

[#8]

Like you didn't already know she was too good for you?

Posted: 3/10/2006 4:30:47 AM EDT

[#9]

Quoted:
Remember, those tests are devised by women for women. You are a male, that means you already have two strikes against you.

Time to metro-up. Get the pink oxford out of the closet & put on some colonge.

Actually, it was a male test: "Do you deserve a hotter girlfriend?" She found it while leafing through a men's magazine and informed me of the results

(I confirmed them to make sure she wasn't exaggerating. She wasn't....)

Posted: 3/10/2006 4:31:48 AM EDT

[#10]

Quoted:
Like you didn't already know she was too good for you?

Yeah, but my goal in life was keeping her from finding out

Posted: 3/10/2006 4:35:05 AM EDT

[#11]

Sounds like a true "for better or worse" affair!
You couldn't do any better, and she couldn't do any worse!

Posted: 3/10/2006 4:37:53 AM EDT

[#12]

Quoted:
Quoted:
Remember, those tests are devised by women for women. You are a male, that means you already have two strikes against you.

Time to metro-up. Get the pink oxford out of the closet & put on some colonge.

Actually, it was a male test: "Do you deserve a hotter girlfriend?" She found it while leafing through a men's magazine and informed me of the results (I confirmed them to make sure she wasn't exaggerating. She wasn't....)

So it was a test designed by metrosexuals for metrosexuals.

Have you seen the clothes they pimp in those magazines?

Posted: 3/10/2006 4:52:06 AM EDT

[#13]

Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Remember, those tests are devised by women for women. You are a male, that means you already have two strikes against you.

Time to metro-up. Get the pink oxford out of the closet & put on some colonge.

Actually, it was a male test: "Do you deserve a hotter girlfriend?" She found it while leafing through a men's magazine and informed me of the results (I confirmed them to make sure she wasn't exaggerating. She wasn't....)
So it was a test designed by metrosexuals for metrosexuals.
Have you seen the clothes they pimp in those magazines?

If its the test I read last week, it was in Maxim a month or two ago, they might pimp a little metro clothing, but most of its cool.

Kharn

Posted: 3/10/2006 4:53:15 AM EDT

[#14]

Don't worry dude, it's girth not length... Besides, most women don't like it when you bottom out. There is a good 5 inches of safety area there.

Posted: 3/10/2006 5:04:30 AM EDT

[#15]

What's the problem with having a "4 issue"?

Question: How do you make a woman orgasm?
Answer: Who cares?

Posted: 3/10/2006 5:04:41 AM EDT

[#16]

Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Remember, those tests are devised by women for women. You are a male, that means you already have two strikes against you.

Time to metro-up. Get the pink oxford out of the closet & put on some colonge.

Actually, it was a male test: "Do you deserve a hotter girlfriend?" She found it while leafing through a men's magazine and informed me of the results (I confirmed them to make sure she wasn't exaggerating. She wasn't....)

So it was a test designed by metrosexuals for metrosexuals.

Have you seen the clothes they pimp in those magazines?

Exactly!! "Men's magazine"? Unlikely it's actually a magazine that any self-respecting man would read. We need an arfcom poll that measures what's really important:

Your score
Multiply the number of semiautomatic weapons you own by the number of magazines you own (for this calculation, you can include en bloc clips as magazines, but not stripper clips). Multiply the result by the number of rounds of ammo you own. Divide the result by 87. Multiply the result by your average number posts per day on arfcom. If you have ever played with dolls and posted pictures of them on ARFCOM, subtract a zillion.

Her score.
Take the number of sandwiches she has made for you in the past month and multiply it by the times she gave you pie in the last month. Add to that the number of times she's been shooting in the past month multiplied by 87. Add a zillion if she's ever purchased a firearm for you but subtract a zillion if she's ever asked "why do you need another gun?"

Posted: 3/10/2006 5:10:09 AM EDT

[#17]

Quoted:
Mama always said "Reach for the stars, Johnny, reach for the stars...."

Yeah, both of em...

Posted: 3/10/2006 5:13:00 AM EDT

[#18]

I did a magazine test once. I got all 30 rounds in it.

Posted: 3/10/2006 5:29:41 AM EDT

[#19]

Quoted:
Like you didn't already know she was too good for you?

dayum...

Posted: 3/10/2006 5:50:00 AM EDT

[#20]

Quoted:
Don't worry dude, it's girth not length... Besides, most women don't like it when you bottom out. There is a good 5 inches of safety area there.

The idea is to tickle; not stab.

Posted: 3/10/2006 6:16:39 AM EDT

[#21]

Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted:
Remember, those tests are devised by women for women. You are a male, that means you already have two strikes against you.

Time to metro-up. Get the pink oxford out of the closet & put on some colonge.

Actually, it was a male test: "Do you deserve a hotter girlfriend?" She found it while leafing through a men's magazine and informed me of the results (I confirmed them to make sure she wasn't exaggerating. She wasn't....)

So it was a test designed by metrosexuals for metrosexuals.

Have you seen the clothes they pimp in those magazines?

Exactly!! "Men's magazine"? Unlikely it's actually a magazine that any self-respecting man would read. We need an arfcom poll that measures what's really important:

Your score
Multiply the number of semiautomatic weapons you own by the number of magazines you own (for this calculation, you can include en bloc clips as magazines, but not stripper clips). Multiply the result by the number of rounds of ammo you own. Divide the result by 87. Multiply the result by your average number posts per day on arfcom. If you have ever played with dolls and posted pictures of them on ARFCOM, subtract a zillion.

Her score.
Take the number of sandwiches she has made for you in the past month and multiply it by the times she gave you pie in the last month. Add to that the number of times she's been shooting in the past month multiplied by 87. Add a zillion if she's ever purchased a firearm for you but subtract a zillion if she's ever asked "why do you need another gun?"

Me: 262069

Her: 140 (She hasn't gone shooting once this month

, I'd be willing to give up some sandwiches though.)

Kent

Posted: 3/10/2006 6:21:16 AM EDT

[#22]

Worthless without pics! ARFCOM needs to concur with the results...

Posted: 3/10/2006 6:22:46 AM EDT

[#23]

That's nothing, I'm a 2 and was dumped by a 9

Posted: 3/10/2006 6:30:50 AM EDT

[#24]

Quoted:
Worthless without pics! ARFCOM needs to concur with the results...

Are you suggesting a penis comparison post?

Posted: 3/10/2006 6:39:44 AM EDT

[#25]

When a fat, old, or ugly guy dates a hot babe, the assumption is there must be something not immediately tangible about him that must make up for his appearance. Either he's rich, or really funny, or simply charasmatic or wonderful.

But if a really good looking guy is dating a fat ugly chick, there's the assumption that the guy must be really a loser.

Posted: 3/10/2006 7:11:34 AM EDT

[#26]

Wheres the pics of your woman, Is she really a 9

ArfCom minds want to know-

Posted: 3/10/2006 7:14:47 AM EDT

[#27]

Quoted:
Wheres the pics of your woman, Is she really a 9

ArfCom minds want to know-

Eb's gorgeous! You have not seen her pic???

I feel bad for ya...I really do.

Posted: 3/10/2006 7:22:44 AM EDT

[#28]

tag for pics.

Posted: 3/10/2006 7:23:23 AM EDT

[#29]

Quoted:
Exactly!! "Men's magazine"? Unlikely it's actually a magazine that any self-respecting man would read. We need an arfcom poll that measures what's really important:

Your score
Multiply the number of semiautomatic weapons you own by the number of magazines you own (for this calculation, you can include en bloc clips as magazines, but not stripper clips). Multiply the result by the number of rounds of ammo you own. Divide the result by 87. Multiply the result by your average number posts per day on arfcom. If you have ever played with dolls and posted pictures of them on ARFCOM, subtract a zillion.

Her score.
Take the number of sandwiches she has made for you in the past month and multiply it by the times she gave you pie in the last month. Add to that the number of times she's been shooting in the past month multiplied by 87. Add a zillion if she's ever purchased a firearm for you but subtract a zillion if she's ever asked "why do you need another gun?"

I like that. I scored 180,248.27

. My wife scored a big fat ZERO. Oh, wait. She's a negative zillion.

Posted: 3/10/2006 7:25:12 AM EDT

[#30]

But isnt this always the case? I see buttugly poor bastards with beautiful women. You got to wonder but I see it all the time.

One of my hot female friends said it was because no one else would ask her out.