Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Site Notices
Posted: 2/23/2006 4:41:16 PM EDT
I deleted the rest of the bill's legal lingo.  It is SENATE BILL NO. 1401.


(7)  During the continuance of any state of  disaster  emergency,  neither
the  governor  nor any agency of any governmental entity or political subdivi-
sion of the state shall impose restrictions on the lawful  possession,  trans-
fer, sale, transport, storage, display or use of firearms or ammunition.


This bill, if passed, would "re-establish the right of the people to lawfully keep and bear
arms in times of a continued state of disaster."


Contact
Name:  Rep. Bill Sali, Sen Gerry Sweet, Sen Russ Fulcher,
      Rep. Cliff Bayer
Phone: 332-1000
Link Posted: 2/23/2006 5:03:43 PM EDT
[#1]
I think Virginia just voted on such a law.
Link Posted: 2/23/2006 5:09:24 PM EDT
[#2]

Quoted:
I deleted the rest of the bill's legal lingo.  It is SENATE BILL NO. 1401.


(7)  During the continuance of any state of  disaster  emergency,  neither
the  governor  nor any agency of any governmental entity or political subdivi-
sion of the state shall impose restrictions on the lawful  possession,  trans-
fer, sale, transport, storage, display or use of firearms or ammunition.


This bill, if passed, would "re-establish the right of the people to lawfully keep and bear
arms in times of a continued state of disaster."


Contact
Name:  Rep. Bill Sali, Sen Gerry Sweet, Sen Russ Fulcher,
      Rep. Cliff Bayer
Phone: 332-1000



I have met Bill Sali. His family homeschools. Gerry Sweet goes to our church.
Link Posted: 2/23/2006 5:13:21 PM EDT
[#3]
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

I thought this was covered a few hundred years ago.
Sad this type of bill is needed at all.

Link Posted: 2/23/2006 5:15:16 PM EDT
[#4]
I think First Freedom reported at least one other state with such a bill in the works.
Link Posted: 2/23/2006 5:17:02 PM EDT
[#5]
Darn skippy.
Link Posted: 2/23/2006 5:17:05 PM EDT
[#6]
What irritates me is the only places that will pass such are bills are places where it is very unlkely it would happen anyway
Link Posted: 2/23/2006 5:26:28 PM EDT
[#7]

Quoted:
What irritates me is the only places that will pass such are bills are places where it is very unlkely it would happen anyway



True, but it's precedent.
Link Posted: 2/23/2006 5:27:25 PM EDT
[#8]

Quoted:
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

I thought this was covered a few hundred years ago.
Sad this type of bill is needed at all.




So Sad indeed.
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top