Keep in mind that GPD has not released an official statement about the incident so the information in the Alli-gay-turd is nothing more than sensationalism at best. Furthermore, the writer is clearly unstructured in respect to how he acquaints his argument against the football players in relationship with the events that allegedly took place. The writer only provides impulsive personal conclusions and attacks that the writer seems to be compelled to include about other non-related stories and opinions as much as possible throughout the article as he attempts to account for the events before, during and after the alleged incident. If the writer would have accounted for the events objectively before making his entire conclusion that was broken up in pieces, it would have made his argument at least seem like a real journalist wrote it instead of sounding like a high school pot head tripping on LSD.
As far as the police entering into the apartment without a warrant, if they have information that leads them to reasonable suspect that the apartment in question is indeed the one, they can enter. In this case, they were able to identify that the suspected apartment of the alleged suspects, did contain a few firearms within their view from the outside. That was enough information for them to have in order to legally enter without a warrant. Police can also enter into any dwelling without a warrant if they are in the process of pursuing of a suspect in relationship with a crime, and have information that the suspect has entered the dwelling.
Edit to add...
It is irresponsible for anyone to be firing a gun in any area that could inadvertently cause harm to someone else. Even if it was an accidental discharge, it just goes to show you that it isn’t a good idea to be intoxicated while handling something that is capable of causing death. The majority of people don’t agree to allowing people to operate vehicles in that condition, so why would we accept it with anything else other than maybe a fishing pole?
It’s people like those described in that ridiculous article that are used to stereo type responsible gun owners as drunken trigger happy homicidal want a be commandos. Which isn’t a fair conclusion to make, but nonetheless it is the tactic that the anti-gun establishment has chosen to use in order to strike fear and hatred in the hearts and minds of the misinformed. It is the only means to an end that has worked and continues to work for them. Mainly because it is almost impossible to document every time a firearm is used lawfully and correctly. Moreover, even if it was possible to document it, no one would want to run every story of it, since it does not invoke a sense of drama and curiosity, and would take up too much time for it to be addressed in the media every time it did happen. Instead, we get the hype and publicity of a very small minority of crimes or irresponsible decision acted out attached to gun use and ownership that doesn’t accurately reflect that the great majority of the time gun owners are trustworthy and responsible.