Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Arrow Left Previous Page
Page / 2
Posted: 2/20/2006 4:36:46 AM EDT
Link Posted: 2/20/2006 4:47:50 AM EDT
[#1]
Nissan Maxima -- 92 or higher for best efficiency.
Link Posted: 2/20/2006 4:48:35 AM EDT
[#2]
Cetane
Link Posted: 2/20/2006 4:48:48 AM EDT
[#3]
Never thought I'd give this answer, but --

87.
Link Posted: 2/20/2006 4:49:11 AM EDT
[#4]
I've never owned a car that needed anything other than 87 but my Vette drinks the good stuff. Thank God it gets great mileage.

You know what though? It's funny but I feel kind of good filling the tank, satisfied sorta. I love every mile I drive in that car.
Link Posted: 2/20/2006 4:50:49 AM EDT
[#5]

Quoted:
Never thought I'd give this answer, but --

87.



Oh GOD!  This 87 crap again!  

I was asking a serious question!
Link Posted: 2/20/2006 4:51:52 AM EDT
[#6]


42 (cetane).... daily driver.... diesel/bio....

car is running on 92 , 100+ octane, driven a few times a year in the summer....

Link Posted: 2/20/2006 4:51:56 AM EDT
[#7]

Quoted:

Quoted:
Never thought I'd give this answer, but --

87.



Oh GOD!  This 87 crap again!  

I was asking a serious question!




It's a serious answer. 87 is low-test.
Link Posted: 2/20/2006 4:53:10 AM EDT
[#8]
The Dodge Hemi runs on the cheap stuff.

The HOG needs 92 due to compression ratio.

The Street Rod gets 92, because it seems like the right thing to do.
Link Posted: 2/20/2006 5:14:16 AM EDT
[#9]
93. It's all we got since MTBE-enhanced 94 was banned by the people who insisted that it was added in the first place.
Link Posted: 2/20/2006 5:17:06 AM EDT
[#10]
93 if I feel generous to her.   Only seems to need it when it's hot out, no pinging on 87 when it's cold outside.    98 Town Car Cartier


My weekend toy gets 110 octane
Link Posted: 2/20/2006 5:17:12 AM EDT
[#11]
87 octane
Link Posted: 2/20/2006 5:18:28 AM EDT
[#12]
87 in the daily driver..... 91 or 93 in the force fed Z
Link Posted: 2/20/2006 5:25:02 AM EDT
[#13]

Quoted:
Cetane



+1
Link Posted: 2/20/2006 5:46:07 AM EDT
[#14]
87

My manual recommends it, and when I tried higher octane, it did nothing for my fuel economy or performance, that I noticed.
Link Posted: 2/20/2006 5:48:15 AM EDT
[#15]
Link Posted: 2/20/2006 5:48:46 AM EDT
[#16]
87 - "regular"
Link Posted: 2/20/2006 5:49:02 AM EDT
[#17]
87 here.
Link Posted: 2/20/2006 5:51:21 AM EDT
[#18]
93, you troublemaker.  Not, I repeat NOT 87.
Link Posted: 2/20/2006 5:58:14 AM EDT
[#19]

Quoted:
93, you troublemaker.  Not, I repeat NOT 87.



Nice Dodge avatar.

Link Posted: 2/20/2006 5:59:56 AM EDT
[#20]
87

98 dodge stratus
Link Posted: 2/20/2006 6:01:20 AM EDT
[#21]
87

Max
Link Posted: 2/20/2006 6:04:10 AM EDT
[#22]

Quoted:
93, you troublemaker.  Not, I repeat NOT 87.





people are answering this seriously!
Link Posted: 2/20/2006 6:09:14 AM EDT
[#23]

Quoted:

Quoted:
93, you troublemaker.  Not, I repeat NOT 87.





people are answering this seriously!



All types of gas should be BANNED

And cars... we should have foot powered Flinstone's cars too.

And guns.... can't forget to ban the guns... and mags.

and I use 87
Link Posted: 2/20/2006 6:10:33 AM EDT
[#24]
87 - the universal truth.
Link Posted: 2/20/2006 6:17:18 AM EDT
[#25]
Link Posted: 2/20/2006 6:30:10 AM EDT
[#26]
87+2=89
Link Posted: 2/20/2006 6:31:37 AM EDT
[#27]
... uh have you seen gas prices lately?

I'll stick a syphon in front of a doper getting high from the fumes if it will get me another 3 miles
Link Posted: 2/20/2006 6:35:37 AM EDT
[#28]

Quoted:
115/145.



Where are you getting that???  Didn't think they made it any more, the purple stuff right?

Seriously - I use the minimum octane needed for my engines, in my case that's 87.
If the engine runs fine on 87 there is no reason to use a higher octane as it can actually reduce the power output of the engine.
Link Posted: 2/20/2006 6:45:14 AM EDT
[#29]
87
Link Posted: 2/20/2006 6:46:43 AM EDT
[#30]
This thread needs a poll.

87 for me.  It's what my manual says to run.  I won't buy a vehicle that requires anything higher.
Link Posted: 2/20/2006 6:48:12 AM EDT
[#31]
add a POLL
Link Posted: 2/20/2006 6:51:58 AM EDT
[#32]

Quoted:
add a POLL



Ok! Have at it!
Link Posted: 2/20/2006 6:54:08 AM EDT
[#33]
I don't need no stinking octane!  Deisel all the way!
Link Posted: 2/20/2006 6:56:42 AM EDT
[#34]
I would use 87 if it wasn't banned from orbit. These things happen for the children you know.
Link Posted: 2/20/2006 6:58:37 AM EDT
[#35]
Link Posted: 2/20/2006 7:08:32 AM EDT
[#36]

Quoted:

Quoted:
add a POLL



Ok! Have at it!




Nice RETARDED poll.
Link Posted: 2/20/2006 7:25:09 AM EDT
[#37]
87 octane.

I love it when SSDG's and gun experts use the 87 octane analogy to explain why not to shoot wolf:

"Would you put 87 octane in your Mercedes benz? So why are you shooting Wolf through your $500-$1000 rifle?"

Well Mr. Genius, the simple truth that destroys your logic is this:
If the Mercedes were designed to run 87 octane, YES I WOULD USE 87 octane. Engines are designed with certain compression ratios in mind. A naturally aspirated low CR engine, in the range of 8-9:1 would run fine on 87 octane. If you step it up to 10-13:1 CR (yes the Lexus IS350 has CRAZY compression) you may need to run 91 or 93 octane at the minimum.
Not only that, but most engines have knock sensors now. Up to 2003, Ford did not install knock sensors in their 4.6L V8s so if your EGR and valves are a bit carboned up, it may ping on 87 octane.

Using 93 octane/Premium does not mean it is the best and cleanest gas. It's just more resistant to detonation and combustion.

That said, what ammo WOULD you shoot through a $1000 rifle? $500 per cartridge ammo? $1 per cartridge ammo? $0.20 per cartridge ammo? Even Bushmaster approves of using Wolf through their rifles.
Link Posted: 2/20/2006 7:25:58 AM EDT
[#38]

Quoted:

Quoted:

Quoted:
115/145.



Where are you getting that???  Didn't think they made it any more, the purple stuff right?

Seriously - I use the minimum octane needed for my engines, in my case that's 87.
If the engine runs fine on 87 there is no reason to use a higher octane as it can actually reduce the power output of the engine.

I knew I'd flush out another plane nut.
And it's not purple. It's magenta! Purple is GAY!



Turbo Blue and some other race fuels are 105-115 octane unleaded. Then there's the leaded stuff. All around $4-$5/gal.
Link Posted: 2/20/2006 7:47:55 AM EDT
[#39]

Quoted:

Quoted:

Quoted:
add a POLL



Ok! Have at it!



Nice RETARDED poll.



A retarded poll goes well with a retarded thread!
Link Posted: 2/20/2006 7:49:33 AM EDT
[#40]

Quoted:

Quoted:

Quoted:

Quoted:
add a POLL



Ok! Have at it!



Nice RETARDED poll.



A retarded poll goes well with a retarded thread!



Started by a RETARD.  How appropo?  
Link Posted: 2/20/2006 7:50:37 AM EDT
[#41]
Link Posted: 2/20/2006 7:52:57 AM EDT
[#42]
93 octane...Subaru WRX.  Wish I could get the 94 octane, but NY state is messing up my gas supply in VT.  That 1 extra point is messing up my performance
Link Posted: 2/20/2006 7:55:57 AM EDT
[#43]

Quoted:
93 octane...Subaru WRX.  Wish I could get the 94 octane, but NY state is messing up my gas supply in VT.  That 1 extra point is messing up my performance



What was it designed to use? Don't go to a higher octane than you need. Unless you're pinging right now, stay with the lower octane.

Sunoco in NJ, PA, OH, and MI has 94 octane. Try to find a Sunoco station in NY.
Link Posted: 2/20/2006 7:56:04 AM EDT
[#44]

Ha!  Multi choice is enabled and I voted for 87.  Three times!

Ha!


87 Octane for 33 grains of rice per mile
Link Posted: 2/20/2006 8:06:51 AM EDT
[#45]
87 in the Ranger, 92+ in the Lightning.

I would run the Lightning on 100 octane if I could buy fuel for it at any gas station.
Link Posted: 2/20/2006 8:10:35 AM EDT
[#46]
92 or 93 per manufacturers specs (Land Rover & Harley Davidson).  87 does not work well in the Land Rover (mileage suffers significantly) and the HD gets good enough mileage that I haven't bothered to try the cheaper stuff.
Link Posted: 2/20/2006 8:18:06 AM EDT
[#47]
T1H

w00t!!!11

Link Posted: 2/20/2006 8:18:40 AM EDT
[#48]
quit kidding youselves. You don't need anything above 87 unless your car cost over 40 grand stock.
Link Posted: 2/20/2006 8:25:08 AM EDT
[#49]
My 2000 Vic gets 13 mpg in the city using either 87, 89, 93, or 94 octane fuel.
Link Posted: 2/20/2006 8:41:16 AM EDT
[#50]

Quoted:
quit kidding youselves. You don't need anything above 87 unless your car cost over 40 grand stock.



Or if it is supercharged.
Arrow Left Previous Page
Page / 2
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top