Here's an email I got when I was researching on if I should buy a Python :
The Python is traditionally one of the true "Cadillacs" (we don't use that
term much any more to indicate top-drawer quality, do we?) of the gun world.
You can (already did? ) figure out much of what is nice about a Python
from handling it -- the triggers are typically wonderful, and for many
people the fit and balance are also wonderful -- just the same way I feel
about my 228s .
It is also a very accurate revolver when in good repair because (unique
among revolver locks, to my knowledge) the hand engages the rear of the
cylinder right up through the moment of discharge. This means that the
cylinder is precisely positioned, and positioned in precisely the same
place, relative to the forcing cone. However! -- the lock itself is not as
strong as an N-frame, and if you shoot alot of full-house loads, you will
wear the hand and lose some of the potential accuracy. This is not fatal,
but you'd need a good (and I mean GOOD) gunsmith to fit a new hand if you
wanted to restore the full potential accuracy of the lock. I shoot mine
mostly with .38 Sp-equivalent target loads for this reason...it's not a
carry or hunting gun, so that doesn't bother me at all. I load these into
.357 Mag cases to avoid putting carbon rings into the cylinder walls, btw.
I used to know a little more about the years than I do now. I think the '85
falls in the "strike years" at Colt. During a fairly long period in the
mid-80s, IIRC, the Colt unionized employees were on strike. The custom shop
was not unionized, and Pythons (and others) were assembled by custom shop
staff. This sounds like a great thing, but in my personal experience it
does not necessarily guarantee a "custom" level assembly and fitting job.
In fact, mine had to go back to the factory at least once because the timing
was off. I have no idea what Colt's labor relations and quality issues were
in 1992; maybe someone else does? Since you have two to compare, and since
generalizations don't really prove how a *specific* revolver functions, I
would compare the two you've got carefully.
One little prejudice. I bought mine in "Ultimate" SS, but I actually think
this was possibly the worst choice. The Ultimate (highly polished) Pythons,
at least in that period, were polished after all the stamping was done, and
the polishers did not use care to avoid washing out the stamping, so it is
not as crisp as the blued Pythons or the matte SS. I think in later years
the polishing was better done (maybe because the custom shop folks had no
polishing training?). It is also sometimes felt that the carbon steel
Pythons are smoother than the SS versions -- you can make up your own mind
on that.
If I were buying a Python (or any revolver), I would check the following
things, in addition to all the usual. If I weren't really sure that I knew
what I was doing, or if the dealer isn't going to stand behind the purchase
100%, I'd get a qualified professional gunsmith's opinion first. Since
you've got two to compare, so much the better -- compare and buy the one
that is in better tune.
(Continued next entry)