Quoted: Nobody is proposing ignoring people.
The federal government has appointed billions to help, and private organizations have given additional billions of aid.
|
But these people ARE being ignored, at least in the context in which I am referring to. The money that's been allocated has been/is being used for many different tasks, but it won't help the well-over 200,000 people facing financial ruin.
There is the Baker Plan, universally supported by virtually all of the leadership and residents, that will buy flooded properties from homeowners who choose to participate. The homeowner does not walk away with every penny that their home was worth... they'd get about 60% of their equity, and the mortgage company would get a similar amount of the balance owed to them in exchange for forgiving the rest of the debt. In other words, homeowners are not given back 100% of what they had pre-Katrina, but they'd have enough to help them start over. That's one aspect of this plan, directly helping homeowners in devastated areas, and preventing the industry-wide financial hit from massive numbers of foreclosures.
The other aspect of the Baker Plan is that it would facilitate the rebuilding of the city. A few people with the means to do so are rebuilding. Others with the means are sitting back and waiting, not wanting to invest a mountain of money in rebuilding their home, only to end up with a really nice house in the middle of what resembles Somolia. The Baker Plan, after buying the destroyed homes, would then sell off the property to developers who would clear the property, rebuild infrastructure, and redevelop the area. Everyone, even those who don't choose to sell, benefits.
This plan is estimated to cost about $30 billion, but about half this money would be PAID BACK to the government as the properties were sold to developers.
It's not a perfect plan, but it's by far the best thing we've been able to come up with, and it is VITAL to the recovery of this area.
The Bush administration is not supportive of the Baker Plan. Their "alternative" is to use the $6 billion in community block grants to help about 20,000 of the affected homeowners. I'm sorry, but to me, that is IGNORING the other 200,000 people.
The massive federal aid that has been sent down here so far is very much appreciated, but it's not nearly enough to help these people get back on their feet.
As a side note, I've been following a story in the news that really illustrates federal bureaucracy. In the past I've heard comments like "for every $1 allocated to the welfare program, only 20 cents or so actually goes to welfare recipients... the rest is used for administrative costs." Well, here in St. Tammany Parish where I live, we had thousands of trees knocked down. FEMA told Parish government that they'd pay for most of the cost tree removal. The only catch is that the Parish must document each and every tree in excruciating detail. This includes using a GPS receiver to assertain the exact lat/lon of each tree. Of course, the problem is that GPS wil give the position to an accuracy of 15 or 30 feet, but there can be quite a number of trees in that space. So, FEMA is giving the Parish a hard time on some of these, because they see multiple trees listed with the same location. I'd be interested to know how much this, along with the other paperwork requirements, affect the final price of tree removal. I'm sure the cost to taxpayers would be DRASTICALLY reduced if FEMA were to, for example, simply utilize satellite imagery to estimate the number of downed trees, adding a little for a fudge factor, and write the check.
A similar story can be found with the trailers that FEMA is providing (about half the houses in my neighborhood have them). These basic, stripped down trailers end up costing approximately $70,000 each after transportation, hook-up, and eventual removal are factored in. Amazing.
My point is that, of the $85 billion in aid that has been cited, how much actual value is coming from that money vs. how much is being thrown away via bureaucratic red tape?
That doesn't mean that we are going to allow the rest of the nation to get told what to do by this incompetent hack of a governor.
|
Well, I can't argue with you about the "incompetent hack" comment... I don't like Blanco, never did, probably never will. But in this particular area, I support her 100%. Over half the oil in the Gulf comes through Louisiana. Give us our fair share, or that supply may very well be disrupted, with national consequences. This may sound extreme, but as a local radio guy said yesterday, we're backed into a corner, and have nothing to lose.
The levee problem wasn't the Feds fault.
|
Some of the blame certainly falls on the local levee boards. But the failure of these levees was NOT a "maintenance" issue, it was an engineering failure, and it is the Army Corps of Engineers who oversaw design and construction of the levee system.
--Mike