Quoted: I'd be suing the shit out of the guy. There's NO personal responsibility anymore for when some one screws up, it seems to me.
Using the logic of having a perfect record, if I went out and shot my neighbor's dog I guess they'd be saying it's okay because it's my first offense? Even it if was an "accident"?
There should be penalties for incompetence, or plain old mistakes. Aren't they supposed to check for chips first, when the animals are being processed?
|
Bad example. Shooting your neighbors dog is not "routine". Euthanizing unclaimed dogs, as unfortunate a practice as it may be, is the routine at animal shelters all through the country.
I am not saying that the individual should not be held responsible, demoted, lowered in pay, etc., etc. One thing missing from the above article is the responsibility that animal services is claiming in this error. If in fact this was due to negligence or malfeasance then animal services should be just as culpable as Mr. Adkins.
All I am trying to point out is that this sad event may be the result of a simple error and not due to incompetence. Dates on forms can be transposed, figures can be misinterpreted.
The way you all talk, I guess you guys have never made a mistake at work?
I worked for several years in an environment where mistakes could cost human lives. We trained very intensively and were held to extremely high standards. But even in this environment, mistakes still happened.
As I said in my first post. If humans are involved in any system, you are going to have mistakes. The challenge is to try to minimize the frequency and more importantly the impact of the mistakes because the elimination of mistakes is impossible as long as humans are in the equation.