Who cares? That is a simple minded way to look at look at a base closing.
What the local community is trying to convey to certain asshole generals and political hacks is the true economic impact of closing a base. The loss of a couple of thousand people from the area when the troops leave, the loss of a couple of hundred jobs associated with the base and the loss of revenue to all sorts of business is far greater than most military figures ever reflect. In the case of the local air base, it has mostly new facilities, it is well liked this is a pro-military area, housing and rent is cheaper here than the national average, it is far enough from town no one bitches about the noise and is one of the most popular assignments in the Air Force. None of this is reflected in whatever the military has to say.
The military portrays it as "saving money" because they do not have the operating costs of running the facility. They typically move the equipment and people and have to construct new facilities at a different location, the savings they claim to have is usually imagined. More than one base closing is motivated by politics and a dislike for the region or the unit or as in the last BRAC list, clearly the Air Force is motivated by an intense dislike for Air National Guard units.
The ANG flys a huge percentage of the Air Force tanker and air lift and does it cheaper and with a higher FMC rate (fully mission capable). In retaliation for this, the Air Force is trying to "co-locate" guard maintanence and pilots with active duty in the same units and steal well maintained guard planes and give them back to the Air Force in hopes of improving their crappy maintanence and flying skills.
The average ANG maintainer has two or three times the number of years of service and far more skill and in many cases they have a similar civilian job that makes them even better at what they do. Quite a few ANG pilots are professional who fly for airlines and have thousands of hours of time,,not a few hundred like most USAF pilots. The makes assholes like Gen Jumper jealous and he tries to ruin the ANG.
There is far more to base closings than you can imagine, it is not social welfare and it is not usually related to the actual need to close the base because it is no longer useful. The impact of bases and small armories in different regions impacts more than just the men and women on the base. It impacts public perception of the military, recruiting, training, local economies and regional protection of the conus. Moving everyone to one big giant base in Kansas may be cheap as hell, but is is not a great idea.
The Puerto Ricans got what they wanted,,,they DEMANDED the Navy leave, they DEMANDED a stop to ALL training and all ships. They should not have expected the base to stay around.