OPINION: When People Want It, It Won't Go Away
By Doug Holm
Conventional wisdom has it that Utah’s pro-gun Legislature won’t be tinkering with the state’s gun laws any time soon. Of course, there are some egregious exceptions to such ordinary thinking—the most interesting of which being Rep. Matt Throckmorton’s effort to return gun rights to the mentally ill during the last legislative session.
Still, most Utahns would probably conclude that Utah’s gun laws will continue to be the most permissive in the nation for some time to come.
But while current local news reports may be focusing on the Olympics, “sky-rocketing energy costs” and other cliché stories, yesterday’s gun issue is quietly preparing for a comeback that won’t be limited to editorial pages.
Word on the street among several Salt Lake politicos is that last year’s failed “Safe to Learn Safe to Worship” ballot initiative is not only alive and well, but may be the winning political head-liner in 2002.
You will remember that during the 1995 legislative session, Utah’s senators and representatives decided to make a great leap away from the Old West ways of leaving one’s holster at the door when attending a church service or a dance at the social hall. By enacting some interesting changes in Utah’s Code, the Legislature not only made it much easier for a citizen to obtain what is known as a “concealed-carry permit,” they also challenged the foundations of private-property law and an even older legal precedent known as common sense.
Overnight, pastors, bishops, principals and private homeowners were finding themselves with the prospect of having unwanted weapons brought into places traditionally expected to be free of firearms. In an effort to bring some sanity back to Utah’s gun laws, a coalition of Utah’s teachers, parents and religious leaders sought to take the issue directly to the people.
Knowing that the Legislature was as likely to pass gun safety legislation as it was to make a holiday for Stokely Carmichael, this group of citizens turned to the ultimate of democratic safety valves—the ballot initiative.
Dubbed the “Safe to Learn-Safe to Worship Act,” organizers hoped to obtain enough signatures to bypass the Legislature and allow citizens to choose for themselves where guns do and don’t belong.
According to the Web page of Utahns Against Gun Violence, the act “prohibits persons, including those holding concealed firearm permits, from the unauthorized carrying of firearms in primary and secondary schools, institutions of higher education and places of worship. Exception is provided for security personnel, law enforcement officers and persons who obtain prior consent from an authorized representative of a school or place of worship.”
To most people reading the UAGV’s statement, it would seem like a cinch to pass such a measure. But of the three high profile initiative attempts in Utah last year (including English Only and changes in asset-forfeiture law) it was Safe to Learn-Safe to Worship that never even made it to the ballot.
Petition organizers failed to garner the necessary 70,000 verified signatures and the effort seemed to be a failure.