For what it's worth, a customer of my company is a retired armorer from the state police (SLED). I got into a conversation with him one day on what type of handgun to buy. He suggested a S&W revolver (despite his admitted disgust for their politics) before his first choice on an auto, a Glock, because SLED had so much trouble with the Remington ammo for autos. He said he had only seen a few squib loads (no powder) in Remington 38 Special, but he had seen many (he didn't define) in Remington ammo for autos. He said a few days during qualifying he spent more time hammering-out stuck bullets in the barrel of a Glock than he did teaching. His theory was that Remington has more trouble with the auto ammo is because the rimmed ammo is made in an old plant with experienced personel, and the new(er) rimless ammo is made in a new plant with lower paid, less experienced workers. Interesting theory. Even though he had a Glock 9mm he was wanting to sell to buy a 1911 in 38 Super, he still suggested buying the revolver. He must feel strongly about it.
Happyshooter, those guys were lucky the rounds simply didn't fire. I don't like the idea of having to hammer a bullet out of my weapon.