User Panel
Posted: 5/19/2005 5:48:55 AM EDT
Happy Victims of Pornography Month!
www.nationalreview.com/comment/nance200505190815.asp Didn't the Supreme Court recently hold that virtual child pornography is a constitutional right? |
|
|
So people are too intentioanlly dense to understand that if you gas up the car, the next "natural" thing to do is to go for a drive.
|
|
+1, G-man. We just had a local pervert convicted of molesting and photgraphing his acts on numerous 8 to 13 yo girls. The cops had pulled him over under a DUI suspision, and found his truck full of pictures of his 'favorites'. They secured warrants, and found all kinds of child porn in his possesion. He has been convicted and will never get out. Porn is free speech. |
|
|
Having looked at porn from time to time all my life, I can honestly say I could have and should have lived without it. I make it my business not to look at porn as much as humanly (and with God's help) possible.
I am not a proponent of banning porn, it is part of free speech. Americans should hold themselves to a higher authority and avoid something so destructive to their spiritual being. I feel that the answer to the porn/child molestation/rape problem in America, (and the correlation does exist) is in the punishment stage. These guys for the most part do not change. They do not want to change. The punishment should fit the crime. Death to all 1st time convicted child molersters. Death to all 1st time convicted rapists. |
|
If every man that viewed porn raped someone, 90% of the male population would be in prison.
I bet a lot of those guys had drinking and drug problem too. I am not supporting porn particularly child porn (those bastards need to die). These guys were fucked up long before they saw porn. |
|
Don't you know the next thing you do after loading a gun is go on a shooting spree?
Kent |
|
Repeat after me:
Porn does not affect the mind Porn does not affect the mind etc. ad nauseum. [/sarcasm] |
|
correlation is necessary but not sufficient for establishing a causal relationship
|
|
Assassins and firearms, a disturbing link...
Child drownings and swimming pools, a disturbing link... Poisoners and pesticides, a disturbing link... Arsonists and kerosene, a disturbing link... Bank robbers and ski masks, a disturbing link... Kidnappers and rope, a disturbing link... Where does it end? At the point at which the inanimate object being blamed for the actions of human beings happens to be something to which you object? |
|
+1. Intuitively, I do not doubt a causal relationship, but this does little to prove the point. |
|
|
Porn is not an 'inanimate object'. Porn is action on display. People emulate what they see on TV. Fact. Why is it any different with porn? |
|
|
If there were no porn, there would be no sexual predators?
The assumption is, because sexual predators like porn, anyone who likes porn is a sexual predator. This is the same fallacy as used by gun control, guns are used in crimes, therefore all gun owners are criminals. |
|
Does the rope plant images in the kidnappers mind? Does the kerosene and inspire and motivate the arsonist? The influence of porn is more active than passive. |
|
|
I agree with you and that is the reason that more crimes are being committed now days because people see that they can get away with stuff. If they made punishments that would truly deter people from committing them, then we would be well on our way to preventing them from happening in the first place. Someone once told me (and I never did confirm it) that the punishment in Turkey for first offense for drunk driving is execution. I don't know about y'all, but that would sure as hell make me really think twice about driving drunk!! |
|
|
If they're going to blame pornography for rape, the next thing you know they'll be blaming guns for murders!
Oh where does it all end? |
|
Thankfully, none of us, I hope, actually understand the mind of a child rapist/murderer.
Their minds are NOT normal by any stretch of the imagination. But we do know what turns them on. And, apparently, it is child pornography. Think about it, ladies and gentlemen, we have gone from a society in which such brutal kidnappings happened so rarely that when they did, that they captured the National attention, to a society in which they occur with such frequency that it is difficult to keep up with which child is missing, and where, and which child has been found dead, and where. There may be many answers to the question, Why? No reason exists for child pornography under any stretch of the First Amendment. If you think it does, maybe we need to watch your house..... Eric The(I'llTakeTheFirstShift)Hun |
|
Weak minded people emulate what they see on TV. Hundreds, maybe thousands of murders are shown on TV everyday in America, yet no one calls for ending television broadcasts to protect us from that.
Perhaps some kidnappers and arsonists are that weak minded. Porn has never inspired anything more in me than an erection. My mind is not weak enough to think that I can do whatever I like with it, just like I have to exercise caution with rope and kerosene. |
||
|
Honestly? Ever learned a sexual position or technique from watching porn? You shave anywhere other than your face? Where did you first see that done? Does your girl shave? Did you influence her to do that? Can you honestly sit there and tell me that nothing (specifically porn) in the world you live in influences you to do anything other that what you conger up in your strong mind? Right........ |
|
|
You exhibted a response. A gun, rope or kerosene will inspire nothing in a 'normal' person. Active or animate vs. passive or inanimate. |
|
|
+1. there may bea positive coorelation between the 2, but to say viewing porn makes youa sexual predator , c-mon. In my psychology classes from college, I seem to remember another correaltion, most sexual predators also seemed to like to driv alot, and most have either expressed intreset in law enforcement or had actually gone thru the interview process. To say there is a " Disturbing link" Is just being naieve. |
||
|
OMG! I just realized that 80% of murderers have guns and I own one!
|
|
Calm down! There's no need to get excited! I will IM you my FFL address and you just quietly send those nasty weapons down to me.... Eric The(I'llKnowWhatToDoWithThem)Hun |
|
|
Further research has shown that 100% of child molesters breathed air, lived in a building, and bathed in water. Disturbing trends.
For what it's worth, I don't think the First Amendment protects pornography. I believe the intent of the 1st was to protect the right of dissent and political speech. This "freedom of expression" stuff is a recent invention, kind of like the "separation of church and state" we hear so much about today. Neither phrase is actually present in the wording of the Bill of Rights. |
|
Quoted:
I may be a little bit naive, but I never knew that any chick shaved 'down there' until I saw pRon. /snip/ Eric The(EndOfStory)Hun |
|
|
Can people send their old Playboy's to you as well? We wouldn't want those naughty Jezebels to tempt anyone into a life of child molestation or anything. |
||
|
Not to be flippant, but what comes first, the chicken or the egg? The viewing of child porn, or the pre-existing and innate desire to have sex with children? To me, the kiddie porn is an offshoot or biproduct of the person being fu**ed up and a pedophile, not the other way around.
Many of us here, that are normal heterosexual men, most likely have some sort of normal smut in our lives...magazines, videos, etc....so it's not a great leap to expect that pedophiles would have kiddie porn in their lives. I don't think for one minute that this is acceptable or protected by the 1st Amendment, I'm just saying I don't believe it *causes* people to become pedophiles or commit child sexual abuse. There have been studies in the past in Europe that showed that when pedophiles have access to books and movies depicting sex acts with children, they are LESS inclined to actually do them. Some of this came out in all of the hullaballoo over the President's Commission on Pornography or whatever it was called, back in the 70s, iirc. I used to be a firm believer in the old adage of paying your debt to society and all that...but it's becoming more apparent every year that pedophiles cannot be "rehabilitated", so we're certainly gonna have to rethink how/if we introduce them back into society after they serve time for whatever crime they've gotten convicted of. |
|
Again, NOT the same. A firearm is an inanimate object. Pornography, like written material, is designed to transfer information. The Constitution and the Bill of Rights are essential pieces of information that define our liberties. The Communist Manifesto is a horrific document created to facilitate the destruction and or enslavement of mankind. The paper that each of these was written on is inanimate. The ink is inanimate. Each individual word is nearly inanimate if removed from the original context. But when you put those words together and create a DOCUMENT and you put forth an idea.....then it becomesa transfereable medium for an idea. Be it love or hate. Be it freedom or slavery. Pornography exists to dehumanise. It exists to seperate sex from love. Pornography proposes by its' very action that the feeling of sexual pleasure or desire exists independently from the philosophical causes of that desire. It promotes that effect is more important than cause. Pornography by and large is very dangerous in the manner that it allows folks to vicariously enjoy what they have not earned. It proposes that SEX and LOVE are serperable and that LOVE is an unneccessary component of sexual desire. It, in effect, attempts to remove value, repect, love and care from the human equation. Love, desire, a sense of value, a sense of ethics that defines value and or desire and sexual congress and the joys that go with it are NOT MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE. |
|
|
What you believe about my personal experiences and the strength of my mind is of absolutely no consequence to me and is a transparent attempt to hijack and further sidetrack this discussion into the realm of the emotional rather than the logical and provably causal. I'm not a frequent or even recent viewer of porn. I wouldn't know where to rent a pornographic video, and I'm on a dial-up connection. It's just not a priority for me to seek it out. Regardless, I'm content that the weak minded will always find something to inspire their lunacy, whatever those among us who only have our best interests at heart can criminalize. |
|
|
Quoted:
By all means! Especially those really collectable issues from the 50's and 60's!
Those womenz are much too old to be of any interest to child molesters. Even the ones, dare I say, who dress as if mere schoolgirls! Eric The(PlaidAndStretchmarksDon'tGoWellTogether)Hun |
||
|
You're making my argument for me here! If porn inspires nothing in me more than what it does, why should it be outlawed? For the sake of what an abnormal person is inspired to by it? What then of kerosene for the pyromaniac and a gun for the abnormally murderous? |
|
|
Wow! 80% of sexual predators watch porn!
I wonder what percentage of the adult male population watches porn? I'm guessing it's pretty darn close to 80%.
I believe the ruling you're referring to was that child-porn laws are designed to prevent and punish the victimization of children. Since animated, simulated, or written depictions of sex with minors don't involve any actual children, the law didn't apply. I don't recall the name of the case, so I don't know exactly what the ruling said. |
|
|
How does that 80% compare to the same age and income group that is not in a relationship? I bet now with the Internet (especially w/ Usenet & Bit Torrent) and soft-core porn on cable, over half of the single males not in a relationship of the males under 40 view porn. Porn is too prevalent in society among people in the demographic group we're talking about to make 80% a smoking gun.z |
|
|
Oral sex was not only unheard of 40 years ago, it would have been regarded as gross...but along came porn and suddenly everyone was "trying it".
Monkey see, monkey do. Advertisers spend billions on ads to get people to connect happiness with driving a sports car... or buying a product... so we know that visuals have a profound impact on our proclivities and prompt us to act. It's not automatic, it's statistical: run a 60 second spot in an audience of 1 million and you will provoke a couple thousand people to DO something that they would not have done otherwise. That's how marketting firms get business... So why would porn suddenly not follow the same human laws of suggestion? Not everyone who sees a commercial for Land Rovers goes out and buys one. But some do who wouldn't have. Not everyone who sees porn seeks out prostitutes...but some do. One feature of porn is the law of diminishing returns... guys first get into soft-porn like our BOTD threads...then after awhile it's no longer exciting so get into full nudity...then penetration...then all the fetishes...then....if they don't control it, the more gross stuff. So it's a mind-drug... "eye candy" says it all... you can get addicted. And the visuals of seeing someone "in extasy" with implausibly awesome babes who just LOVE to get a man's attention even when saying "No" has GOT to have an effect on guys who are addicted and on one range of the bell curve. Marketting being what it is... and psychology being what it is... guys who otherwise would just have been jerks and loners become monsters thanks to the suggestions and visuals provided by the fantasy world of Porn. Marriages are harmed as guys dream of babes other than their wives...and sex becomes a self-centered sport rather than a sign and summit of romantic love. So outlawing Porn and its distribution will protect some people from becoming addicts but would fuel a new underground industry like the illegal drug world... You'll save some people but at a cost. We have to decide if we as a society are ready to pay the price to keep kids safe from such addictive mind-drugs as porn... and unfortunately I don't think we are. I think our generation X and Y are already hooked. It'll take Gen Z to go clean. |
|
There is no "biological gun drive" There is a "biological sex drive" |
|
|
Saying that porn causes rape is the same as saying guns cause murder.
Give it a rest already. |
|
40 years ago must have been the dark ages of sex since the Ancient Greeks, Ancient Romans, Ancient Peoples of the Asian subcontinent and Shakespeare's contemporaries were well versed in all manner of sexual intercourse and assorted types of depravity. As someone else had mentioned, I'd like to see what porn 'usage' is among non "serial killers and rapists" is versus "serial killer and rapist" porn usage before I would concede a correleation, much less causation. |
|
|
Umm, never opened a history book have you? It has been very common throughout history, even pre-porn history. Same with shaving, anal sex, and everything else. Nothing has been invented by the porn industry, just mass marketed. |
|
|
I looked this up and the case was a little older than I thought (2002). There was a federal law that banned virtual porn. The Supreme Court voted 6 to 3 that virtual child porn is protected by the first amendment. Link. From Justice Kennedy's opinion:
|
|||
|
Actually, sexually, there is NOTHING new under the sun. Sexual practices from oral sex, to sodomy to pedophila to WHATEVER have been around as long as ( of course much longer than ) recorded history. American society attempted to distance itself from it ( Hedonism ) because early on, despite our many mistakes and intentions both good and otherwise, it ( Hedonism ) was looked on with disdane for what it was: mindless amusement of little to no value. Our Puritanical anscestors felt that we were above such things and attempted to exorcise these things from the collective consciousness of Americans. Humans being what they are, it was a near exercise in futility and I believe they went about it in the wrong way in such a fasion that interest in all things sexual became more popular only for the reason that it was SO "verboten" for so long. |
|
|
Would you not concede that man has a biological urge to kill? |
|
|
Seeing a gun doesn;t have a chemical reaction in EVERY human like seeing porn does. Pornogrpahy plays on a biological chemical reaction called the sex drive as a sort of instinctual mechanism for the survival of the species. Thus your gun to porn comparison doesn't hold. NO ONE is saying porn is a legit excuse for any behavior. We;re saying that porn has a PREDICTABLE reaction in every human, and that in 80% of child molestors, pron was a contributing factor. But as I said initially, some people are too intentionally dense to see this indisputable correlation. YOu are prolly emotionally invested in wanting to see porn, just as I am emotionally invested in advocating Biblical principles. |
|
|
No. Absolutely not. And certainly not simply because he is in the presence of a firearm. Comparatively, there IS a copulation instinct in EVERY normal, healthy adult male when seeing pornography. There is a self-preservation instinct, but that USUALLY evidences itself in flight, NOT fight. |
||
|
How about "if criminals have guns, then all gun owners are criminals." |
|
|
Aha, well no sense in arguing conclusions if we can't agree on the premises! |
|||
|
I agree. Tho it DOES concern me somewhat that being in the presence of a gun makes you want to kill (with your killing instinct ) just like seeing porn makes you want to hump (with your sex drive). |
|
|
+1000 |
|
|
The key to wisdom is knolwedge and being able to tell right from wrong. The key to morality is being able to look the Devil in the eye and tell him to get out of your life. Hiding from knowledge or evil is nor never was the solution but knowing ones enemy and facing it. Tj |
||
|
Whoa whoa whoa, you're extrapolating too far, my friend. I NEVER meant to suggest that was the case. I do think that man has an instinctual drive to kill. (whether it be to eat or to preserve life or to gain territory eliminate rivals or establish power) I do not think this drive has anything to do with the mere presence of a firearm. I also think man has an instinctual drive to copulate. I do not think that this is triggered by the mere presence of porn. (seeing porn does not make me want to hump, as you put it) These are the premises to which I refer. I do not and would not suggest that handling or viewing a firearm causes me or most ordinary folks to want to kill. I imagine that for some people it does but I would suspect that these people have deep rooted emotional or mental problems |
||
|
Yes, and given we KNOW the immense power of the human sex drive it is PREDICTABLE that porn would make that drive a dangerous tool in the hands of man. Are rapists / child molestors guilty for their sins / crimes? YES. Does porn increase their appetites? ABSOLUTELY. Even the legal profession recognizes the concept of depraved indifference and a sort of "winding the watch spring" that causes crime. We prosecute people who commit acts that increase the lieklihood of crime. And that EXACTLY what porn does. Should we outlaw porn? I don't really want to go there. But DO NOT look me in the eye and try to tell me porn doesn;t cause much of the sexual perversion we have today, and expect me to consider you logical. |
|
|
Ah, I see, you are saying that the only purpose of guns is to kill. Go back to DU, Feinstein. |
|
|
That's EXACTLY my point, and why the gun to porn comparison doesn't hold. In the normal adult male, seeing a gun doesn't make you want to kill. In the normal adult male, seeing porn ALWAYS makes you want to bang. Always. That is both correlation and causality. Now... ...as for child molestors, this report is showing 80% have an INDISPUTABLE correlation to porn. So..... You want porn? Fine. But live with the foreseeable consequences. |
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.