User Panel
They need to start using some of that cloning technology to breed some Neanderthals. I want to see them play in the NFL !!!
|
|
|
The basics I heard were that the average Neandertal looked about like Arnold in his heyday. |
|
|
There was a Creationist Scientist that visited the middle school I went to (I went to a private school for about 3 years) that had an interesting theory on Neanderthals. I don't remember everything exactly but he said it's what humans would look like if they lived for hundreds of years as described in the Bible before the flood. Supposedly the atmosphere was completely different and had some sort of "canopy" that was able to sustain living organisms much better then the post flood atmosphere. He said that is why their brow bones were so pronounced. That is because your brow bone among other things never stops growing so over time it could theoretically look like on Neanderthals. I'm not saying I believe it and I left about 95% of what he said out because I don't remember. It was interesting nonetheless. There were alot of other theories he presented and some of them were very interesting although I don't really know what I thought about alot of them.
|
|
Hey SIG_220, what was that guy smoking when he told you that stuff?
SGatr15 |
|
I don't know. I'm just posting what he said not what I think. I have a BS in Zoology Biomedical Sciences but I still find stuff like that interesting.
|
|
'Give him a shave and a haircut and you'd think he was tough looking, but you wouldn't object to him marrying your sister' - Michael Crighton
|
|
Neanderthal Man represents a parallel evolution of humanoid creatures. We did not evolve from Neanderthal Man. He is just another 'branch' of the evolutionary 'tree.'
|
|
That's about the only thing I can remember from Intro Anthropology. Those guys had some big honkin teeth. The skull model my Professor brought to class was amazing looking. |
|
|
Neaderthal DID fight Mothra......thats why we are here......I thought you knew that. |
|
|
Not saying I'll go betting my salt on that one, but just for your own intrest you might want to look up theories on who the Nephelim were. Intresting stuff. |
|
|
Stop it already... Cro-Magnon was a modern Homo sapiens sapiens. Neandertal was Homo sapiens neanderthalensis, a relative of Homo sapiens sapiens. |
|
|
Correct. |
|
|
So, did the Neanderthals die off or did we interbreed with them. I swear I have seen folks with prominent brow ridges who have a little "N" in their DNA.
|
|
Neanderthals were short, stubby guys. It would be like fighting a guy with Down syndrome. Lotta strength, but nothing between the ears. I'd say Neanderthal takes the early advantage in a fight, but loses gas shortly after that and gets choked out by modern man (who has access to performance-enhancing drugs).
|
|
I remember argueing with someone here about Neaderthal man, he claimed it was cause they were humans who had 'rickets' whole familys living together and a whole continent who had rickets . And it seems that only europeans (neanderthals) had rickets, neither Africans, Asians or anyone else just THEM! What dummies they are! Oh yeah and when I asked him what happened to all the Dinosaurs that left the ark(cause they were on the ark don't you know!) He threw out like 10 "excuses" lets see, meteor storm, lack of food, disease from all the dead corpses, LA LAH-LA LA LA LA LA!! totally looney tunes!
|
|
Interesting thing is the cranial cavity for Neanderthals is actually bigger than that of modern humans. |
|
|
Missing the "shaved head and bling-bling" man |
|
|
Let me be the first to ask: What's the best round to use aganist Neaderthal Man???
|
|
|
|
DBP54 -
If you extend that comparison to the modern day black man, you can call yourself a follower of Charles Darwin. That's what Darwin said - the modern black man is a less evolved form of the white man. (Tho I would advise NOT telling Mike Tyson about yours and Darwins little theory. ) |
|
|
|
Displaced by the more successful species. |
|
|
Funny I don't remember reading that in The Descent of Man or Origin of Species. Got a page number? |
|
|
Actually the "racist" evolutionary theory went like this, Asians are decended from Orangatans, Because they are found in Asia and have "orangish" skin, White men are decended from Chimpanses because they're sorta white skinned animals with brown hair, and finally Black people are decended from Gorillas because they have black skin are much physically larger but a smaller brain. This was one of the kookier Evolutionary thoeries of the 1850's just after Darwins book came out. It was proven of course to be totally false.
|
|
Yes but it wasn't a theory of Darwin himself. |
|
|
I smell a reality show! |
|
|
The first computers took up the space of an entire room. Today's can be held in your hand and are more powerful. It's the wiring of the brain, not the mass, that is important. Having a huge head just requires more energy to maintain. More chance for tumors as well. |
||
|
Actually they werent. The very first skeleton found in the Neander Valley in the 1880's had ricketts and osteo-arthritus and may have been in his 60's! He had bent legs, a bent back, and a broken arm that had healed crooked. The average of the Neanderthal male skeletons found so far is right around 6 feet. Meaning that on average they were about 4 inches taller than a modern Human One thing about them, at least from the skeletons recovered so far is that the Neanderthal size range was a lot narrower than Homo Sapiens. A modern Human can be anywhere from 5 foot tall to six and a half feet tall and still be "normal" Recovered Neanderthal males all cluster within 4 inches either side of six feet. Judging by their long bones, Neaderthals were MASSIVELY strong. They may have been close to being as powerful pound for pound as chimpanzees or gorillas are. If any of you remember back a few months to the articles about the guy in California who was mauled by the two "tame" chimpanzees at a animal sanctuary- think about that kind of power on a six foot frame. |
||
|
M. Creighton's "eaters ot the dead" is a (supposedly true) tale based on the last interactions of modern man and Neandertals. Great read.
|
|
You guys wonder where they went?
Hmmm. They did just fine in Europe for 1000s of years. Lived right through an Ice Age there. No problemo. And then, modern man arrived. Strangely enough the Neandethals disappeared right around the appearance of modern man. Now, one could believe that the change in temperature killed them off. I'm a big fan of the theory that our European ancestors wiped them off the face of the earth. The first case of genocide and successfully done as well. They did not intermarry nor did they survive. There aren't any good hiding places left. Unless one considers bigfoot. |
|
|
Modern man is the ultimate killing machine, we are the product of 4.5 billion years of "survival of the fittest."
|
|
garandman, Have you ever read The Descent of Man?
www.online-literature.com/darwin/descent_man/3http://www.online-literature.com/darwin/descent_man/3 |
||
|
Why the hell didn't modern man keep neanderthal women around as pets and stuff?
|
|
DNA on teeth from the youngest Neaderthal's found, from Spain c25,000ybp, show that they are not related to any living groups of humans. It looks like what happened here was the same thing that had happened a couple million years earlier in Africa, with the Austrolopithicines. The family divided into a "robust" and a "gracile" branch. The gracile brance (barring some surpirse discovery) appears to have evolved into the Homo family. The "robust" Austrolopithicines stayed in Africa and eventually died out, though exactly when and why is still up in the air-much like determining the cause of Neanderthals demise. Neanderthals, were the Robust variation of the Homo line, but wether they came from the oldest Homo, Homo Habilis (the first tool maker so far only found in East Africa) or from the later Homo Erectus (which has now been found everywhere except the Americas and Austrailia) has not yet been determined. A interesting monkey wrench thrown into all this is the recently announced discovery of the dwarf human Homo Floresenses in the Flores Islands of Indonisia. Fossil proof that that Darwins old observation of how a population in isolation will adapt to the local conditions. In their case a population of Homo Erectus that were isolated on these islands grew smaller as conditions favored those individuals who could get by with less food. Resulting in a population of Hominids that were only around 3 feet tall and 60-80 pounds. Did the same thing happen when a population of Erectus got cut off by ice flows in Europe- only in reverse? Selection pressure for living amongst the mega-fauna like mammoth, mastadon, cave bear, dire wolf, and saber tooth cats (as well as also living with the large, dangerous game like rhino, hippo, bison, wolf, lion, tiger ect that still hang on today) produced a physical super-human? One thing though, modern man and Neaderthal man co-existed in Europe for a good 25,000 years. They did not just "suddenly" disappear. Eventually they were weeded out, but it did not happen instantly upon the arrival of modern man- if it had been it would be comparitively easy do deduce the cause of disapperence. Like here in America, the oldest evicence of modern Humans here is 13,000 ybp in Nebraska. And by 10,000ybp the mega fauna were gone from the Americas. That STRONGLY points to human cause- since the rate of dying was faster than the rate the glaciers were withdrawing. But there is no such quick jump in the fossil record in Europe. |
|
|
|
The top image is not accurate. Its based on the old, erroneous, "stooping" reconstruction. , Neanderthals body type fit within the range of modern humans- though on the large end. The skull is the major difference, it does have a different shape. The brain volume is actually at the high end of the range for modern humans. But the shape of the skull means that volume had to have been organized differently. Here is a interesting article showing that its primarily Late Modern humans who have the smaller faces and rounder heads- www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/100/14/8142#SEC2 There are differences in the internal structure of the long bones, but that would not be visible from the outside. |
|
|
There has been some speculation that There was some interbreeding between "modern" man and neanderthals. Some possible evidence of this was dug up in Spain I believe, and consisted of what appeared to have been Hybrids between the two. Another prevailing theory is that the differing hunting techniques and lifestyles allowed for Cro-mags to be more effective at the harvest of game, while the innefficient methods of Neanderthals slowly became the demise of them as the climate changed.
Personally, having done some reasearch on prehistorical societies, I have come to the conclusion that the past is alot more dynamic than most believe and that there are as many possible stages in our evolution as there are individuals. I cannot discount the possibility of interbreeding because of the current propensity of our species to bang anything that moves. I cannot discount a genocide of sorts because we are pretty good at that too, and I cannot discount out competing Neanderthals, because our competitive nature is one of the hallmarks of our survival thus far. More than likely there was plenty of each and possibly other instances that we have not accounted for . |
|
There are some who still hold to the interbreeding theory. But Penn States DNA testing of those same Spanish finds, as well as others from Croatia and Palistine, just don't show any mDNA commonality. Granted it was a small sample, (they had to have teeth to sample) and they could only search for mDNA (the only thing that survives that long we can test for). The odds are pretty long that Penn States work will be overturned. If there were hybreds, it would be more likely that it was from two groups living closely togeather for some time who over several generations collected a number of individuals who were hybred-and sterile. Think horse/donkey/mule. If you got PDF here is a recent article on the work of studying Ancient DNA: myweb.tiscali.co.uk/henry/Articles/Ancient%20DNA%20comes%20of%20age.pdf |
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.