Stop and think about this.
An article on Drudge says that the Alanta shooter`s 1st trial ended when the JURY voted 8 to 4 to AQUIT him.
The judge THEN declared a mistrial and ordered a new trial.
I thought an aquital meant you walked. And that you only needed an unaminiouse decision in murder trials?
How can the judge then say he doesn`t like that decision so he is going to throw that jury out and find one that will rule the way he likes?
Is that justice?
I`m not saying the guy was justified in killing innocent people.
But, if you think about it, what would YOU have done?
Just accept your fate,,,,or take some kind of action?
What about the woman in Florida who the judge and her husband insist on murdering?
What should her father do to save her life?
The state legislture made a law against what the courts are doing to her,,,,but the courts over ruled the law.
What next?
What if it was YOUR daughter?
I am in NO WAY advocating ANYTHING.
I am just asking what if this happens to you,,,what will YOU do?