Q: And the other option is....?
A: A Democrat who [red]supports [i]all[/i] gun control.[/red]
The NRA is simply telling the voters "this guy isn't perfect, but if you don't get out and vote, the other clown will win and [b]then[/b] where will we be?" You may not like it, but the lesser of two evils is, in fact, the better choice.
Ladies and gentlemen, the NRA has about 4 million members. That's less than 2% of the population. We're [b]far[/b] from a majority. If every NRA member in N.J. voted for a Libertarian candidate, that candidate would still come in third.
You can tilt at windmills all you want, but you aren't going to be putting a staunch pro-2nd candidate into any elected position - actively supporting the right to keep and bear arms is the [b]definition[/b] of "politically incorrect". Translation: "unelectable".
We aren't going to correct the problem from the top down. We have to correct it from the bottom up. Remember - our elected representatives do just that - represent the majority of the people who vote them into office. Judging from the qualities of those currently in office, this seems to indicate that the majority of the people are complete idiots.[sniper]
P.S.: zx2 wrote
Also, never rely on any org to voice your concerns. Take the 15-20 minutes it takes a week and do it yourself. If you want to do more, start writing op-eds and retorts to the antis for your local papers.
View Quote
[i][b]EXACTLY right[/i][/b]