User Panel
Posted: 1/8/2005 8:27:15 PM EDT
story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=2027&e=1&u=/chitribts/mysteriousjettiedtotortureflights
Seems like the CIA is using a Gulfstream registered to a dummy corporation to fly al-qaida terror suspects to countries that are less PC in dealing with war situations. This process is called "rendition"; frankly its turning terrorists over to folks who will torture them and then pass along the intell. Yea or nay to this? Or, should we even know about it? And who are these people spotting the aircraft and logging their trips? Don't they know/care they are helping out our enemy? |
|
As long as they make every effort to make sure they've got the right bad guys, it doesn't really bother me too much.
Bu the second they start rounding up innoncent |
|
If you dont know, how do you know who they have? Or if they have the right guys at all? |
|
|
|
Uhhh... |
|
|
This sort of thing has been done for years (maybe not with that specific aircraft) and most people on this board have commented on it in the past.
It's only news to those reporters who need something anti-Bush to shriek about now that the armor thing has gone stale. To answer your second question, people are fucking stupid and always feel the urge to know about stuff they shouldn't know about. Stupid behavior ensues when they act on these urges, as they inevitably do. Things are secret because most people seldom need to know everything that the US government is doing in the world at every instant. Telling everyone would be somewhat counterproductive to the idea of keeping a secret and thus keeping the advantages that information brings. You are in the 10% of the population of this country that understands that. Most people don't. It comes down to the same reason why people bitch about the President when they don't have 1/10 of the information he does. Self-importance. They, for some inexplicable reason, think they are more qualified to do the job. They also think they deserve to know everything about everything even though they probably wouldn't understand the intricacies of it and couldn't keep their mouths shut about it for longer than a fraction of a second anyway. |
|
Good for them. Hopefully they do a bit of rough interrogation themselves. In my opinion this, like all other information about the intimate details of military operations and wars in general should be regulated, if released at all.
War is not a game. It should not have play by play footage broadcast live into American homes. It seems to me that the average person is not the same as the kind of people that fight wars. Giving the press a blank check to report whatever they want is an invitation to have the worst infomation possible fed to the people who are least able to deal with it. There is nothing happening today that hasn't happened in previous wars. The difference is that today, the media is able to report whatever they want, however they want. During WWII, nobody in the United States saw footage of Marines cutting gold teeth from the mouths of dead and dying Japanese soldiers, and there were no broadcasts of submarine sailors using machineguns to kill survivers of sunk Japanese troop ships. These things happened, as they do in all wars. That is how war is. It is an ugly thing that few who haven't participated in truly understand. The American public doesn't need to know anything more than that we are winning. The means that are used to reach that goal will never be fully understood by the majority of the public, and broadcasting footage of it only serves to create a bad impression of American troops, which I suspect, is the goal of most journalists. |
|
A Ok, as long as they don't give them any peanuts for the flight over
|
|
|
||
|
The press will whine if we drop bad guys off in Egypt for "energetic" interrogation to learn of future terrorist acts, and they will whine if something bad happens because we didn't learn about it in advance. You can't win with these guys - f*ck them.
|
|
This is what I call some good "out-sourcing"! I have no problem with it.
|
|
Like, running to the beach to see the tsunami wave? |
|
|
BTW, when I opened this thread and saw the word "torture flights", I expected something a bit Vietnam'ish. I have heard stories (and confirmed at least one through a Marine Force Recon guy who I know was there) that some CIA operators used to take VC prisoners up in Hueys and if they didn't tell them what they wanted to hear, would dump them out the cargo doors. He said it was a weird sight seeing a black pajama clad man falling a couple thousand feet through the air.
If what we do now freaks out the bleeding hearts, they'd die if they knew some of things we have done in the past. |
|
the classical administer pain or tremendous fear torture isn't nearly as effective as trickery and befriending a subject....
|
|
All I care to know is that they opened the doors in the back of the C-130/C-17 somewhere over the Atlantic or Indian Ocean at 10,000 ft and that some sharks had a good meal.
|
|
Yea its no big deal for now because we're at war and they are the enemy. But someday, it will be acceptable to do this to American citizens. It's in the fine print of the patriot act for sure.
|
|
Is that like half a helicopter ride? Why waste so much of the taxpayers money on jet fuel and manpower. I think a helicopter would save $$. Just shoot them. Not all of them, just "them." You know who I'm talking about. |
|
|
I'd like to know about it. Here is one.. the C.I.A. can not legaly spy on domestic citizens.. so they ask the British to do it. |
|
|
I don't care. If they've got the right guy and it saves one Marine/Sailor/Soldiers life,
Red is positive and Black is negative! Ben |
|
Interesting scenario, eodtech2000...
Ethical question: If you were say a loadmster on such a hypothetical C-130/C-17, the CIA guys aked you to open the ramp at 10,000 feet and chucked a couple of terrs out the door, what should your proper reaction be? |
|
What about "NO vacancy" do you not understand! |
|
|
If someone from their fucked up counrty wants to bomb ours, and they won't give him up, they can
take whatevery torture they have comming! WELCOME TO WAR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! And the Libs in the Media that have no idea what the fuck is going on don't even need to be in iraq!!! If you don't like the way things are in the US, get the fuck out! |
|
WWWWHHHHHHHHEEEEEEEEEEEEWWWWWWWWWWEEEEEEEEEEEEE! YOU BOYS ARE GOING FOR A RIDE! YEEEHAW! Ben(the cowboy) Texan |
|
|
Well said. |
|
|
just fine with me,,,you know threatening one with a quick death ie. bullet to the brain housing group sure beats a long fall etc. thats the differance,,should have a pool of piranas etc..or better yet a slow dip into a vet of acid....if the liberal traitors don't like it they can stand in for the TERRORIST,,and give the terrorist 9 lives,,lives of liberal(socialists) then his would go after. see how many lib's volunteer,,hel you see how fast they line up to serve US!
|
|
I just wish we could do it ourselves instead of having let others do it for us.
|
|
|
The Koreans did one better than this, they would take up two or more and throw one out before the questions began just to set the pace of things. |
|
|
I don't want to know what they are doing (details) just that they are doing it........
As far as the media goes, shouldnt be there anyway. War is managed chaos, and when you have too many Chiefs trying to run the tribe the Calvary sneeks in the treeline and wipes everyone out....... |
|
Personally I have no problem with it all. In my mind's fantasies I'd love to see a scene out of one of the Hannibal movies where the swine eat the terrorist in front of the others.................... bet you'd get some intel fast
|
|
and you people have the audasity to call someone else "un American"
May just as well set saddam free and pay him. be the same fuking thing. Chris |
|
I do beleive that Bill Clinton originally authorized this. I believe I heard about it on the radio.
|
|
is that supposed to make it ok? Chris |
|
|
+1 "I know nothing... noth-ing!!" LOL |
|
|
StormSurge,
Did you also find a link for those seeking employment? I'm available. |
|
"No! There's no way I'm giving one of those assholes an air bottle so they'll be conscious when they hit the ground!" Personally, I don't see a problem with any of this. Let's say Boris the Chechen has committed atrocities in Russia, was involved in that Theater thing, blew up some busses of schoolkids, etc. Say we catch him in Afghanistan helping the Taliban or something. We got three choices: A) send him to gitmo and announce to the world we captured him B) shoot, shovel, shut up C) "Excuse me, Mr. Putin? Yah..we got Boris here. No, we didn't tell anyone we captured him. No, no problem forking him over to you..and no, we won't let anyone know about that, either." Option C) is sounding pretty good to me. In fact, let Boris hear that exchange. Guarantee he'll flip on whomever faster than a $5 hooker if he thinks it'll stop him from going to the people that want his ass. Pump him for info...THEN send him off to the Motherland with a hearty "Dosvidania, Comrade!". |
|
|
Story time. During one operation, in which the objective was to find and capture/kill an NVA general, a LRRP team took two prisoners, an elderly Vietnamese man and a younger Vietnamese man. They were picked up in a helicopter for interrogation; two individuals came along with the helicopter to begin their interrogation on the flight back, as speedy interrogation is important, and they also had the above in mind. One of the individuals began asking the younger man the whereabouts of the general, which the younger man refused to answer. The elderly man was then tossed out of the helicopter, in an effort to get the younger man to talk. After the elderly man was ejected from the aircraft, fear was evident in the younger man's eyes. Success! He would talk now! They repeated the question about the whereabouts of the general. In response, the frightened young man pointed out the door of the helicopter with his chin. The two individuals abandoned this interrogation technique shortly thereafter. |
||
|
Do you use the pallet loading system or do it by hand? Hmmm, interesting question. Kharn |
|
|
should we know? if the CIA was competent there'd never even be suspicious rumors about whether or not it might be happening
just remember this. what they do now is practice for when they decide gun owners are terrorists |
|
Did I say it was ok? Did I say it wasn't ok? Did I make any judgement whatsoever on the situation. |
||
|
it was a question dig dug, I didn't say one way or the other. just asked a question. Chris |
|||
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.