User Panel
User Panel
User Panel
|
Posted: 1/7/2005 11:25:20 AM EDT
[#1]
EVEN BETTER! What a bunch of idiots.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/7/2005 11:27:22 AM EDT
[#2]
Finally! some resonable, sensible gun control that will curb gun violence in the streets, and it will reduce old west-style shootouts. 
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/7/2005 11:28:41 AM EDT
[#3]
ignore me I know nothing
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/7/2005 11:41:36 AM EDT
[#4]
It just goes to show you what happens when a governmental system loses the ideal of rights and liberties belonging to individuals. Instead, they see their juristiction as a child whose every current and future need is governments resposnibility. Gone are the days when elected officals play adminstrator of public services. Enter the days utopian socialist agendas...
The bright side of a law like this is that it is bad enough and gets to the basic point enough, to make a good case for the SCOTUS. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/7/2005 11:41:51 AM EDT
[#5]
Cool. This may be the Second Amendment case we've been looking for.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/7/2005 11:45:38 AM EDT
[#6]
Seems like that would be the best place to be a criminal, plenty of unarmed sheep to victimize.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/7/2005 11:45:42 AM EDT
[#7]
HEY! Welcome back! |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/7/2005 11:49:28 AM EDT
[#8]
Let's just watch their violent crime rise so we can use them as an example of why gun control doesn't work.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/7/2005 11:50:31 AM EDT
[#9]
Might we be witnessing the formation of the "perfect storm"???  www.ar15.com/forums/topic.html?b=1&f=5&t=311718 |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/7/2005 11:52:18 AM EDT
[#10]
But we already have Britain, Canada, and Australia... |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/7/2005 11:54:12 AM EDT
[#11]
"Ban on sale, manufacture, and distribution..." all of which can only be done by FFLs in Californistan.
I've heard there are only two FFLs in the city of San Francisco. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/7/2005 12:00:14 PM EDT
[#12]
Let's hope they both do a booming business before the ban goes into effect, then take their profits and set up shop outside the city limits. It's the law of unintended consequences. leelaw, howdy bud. 
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/7/2005 12:11:42 PM EDT
[#13]
Shocking.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/7/2005 12:12:31 PM EDT
[#14]
It can't break off and fall into the ocean fast enough for me.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/7/2005 12:20:20 PM EDT
[#15]
So when do they vote on this steamy pile of **** ?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/7/2005 12:22:26 PM EDT
[#16]
November, unless it's withdrawn or stalled in court. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/7/2005 12:23:02 PM EDT
[#17]
They will learn the hard way when violent crime sky rockets as it has done in every other big city where guns are heavily regulated/banned.
They deserve every bit of it too. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/7/2005 12:23:03 PM EDT
[#18]
Never works that way. "An increase in crime?" "More gun control." |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/7/2005 12:26:53 PM EDT
[#19]
chicago, nyc, dc |
||
|
|
|
Posted: 1/7/2005 12:30:44 PM EDT
[#20]
There is but one tiny problem - the state constitution prohibits local gun control laws - a tiny problem that the city will ignore, just as the entire state of New York, New Jersey, Illinois, and California do with the US Constitution.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/7/2005 12:31:28 PM EDT
[#21]
Oh me too ... Death to Americans!!
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/7/2005 12:38:30 PM EDT
[#22]
Damn.  |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/7/2005 2:59:43 PM EDT
[#23]
NEVER REGISTER, NEVER REGISTER.... repeat until you get it.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/7/2005 4:27:00 PM EDT
[#24]
San Francisco is gambling that they might have a chance though given the legal victories that West Hollywood (?) had in banning saturday night specials. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/7/2005 4:30:52 PM EDT
[#25]
Damn, I won't be able to bring my 6" magnum into the bath house.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/7/2005 4:37:14 PM EDT
[#26]
++1 why couldn't that 8.9 quake have taken out the blue counties of PRK? wganz ¶ |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/7/2005 4:39:52 PM EDT
[#27]
Go easy on the gays and the RKBA, remember, the Pink Panthers are on our side! |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/7/2005 4:40:18 PM EDT
[#28]
Old News, not news. It's doa or shortly thereafter.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/7/2005 4:41:36 PM EDT
[#29]
There is something appealling about having the most liberal city in CA advertise that they are "gun free". Perhaps is a form of Darwinism at work.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/7/2005 4:44:41 PM EDT
[#30]
Nope, stuck with your stubby  |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/7/2005 4:44:51 PM EDT
[#31]
You do mean your firearm..............don't you? |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/7/2005 4:45:55 PM EDT
[#32]
Just another reason why I never accepted a transfer to the SF bay area. Nice scenery and great weather but the gun laws are bad enough here in New York without having to out and seek something worse.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/7/2005 4:53:11 PM EDT
[#33]
I don't know about you, but I don't own any guns...except the one in my pants. I own rifles, shotguns and pistols. This is my rifle, this is my gun, this one's for fighting, this ones for fun.  Only steers and queers come from San Francisco and you don't like like a steer to me.... 
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/7/2005 4:54:27 PM EDT
[#34]
so don't move there.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/7/2005 5:05:20 PM EDT
[#35]
Maybe I will just pretend I am a holster? |
||
|
|
|
Posted: 1/7/2005 5:49:14 PM EDT
[#36]
San Francisco tried gay marriage, and the whole country turned against it. Hopefully this gun grab will have the same effect.
BTW, wife of Mayor of SF Newsom just filed for divorce. Coincident? |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/7/2005 11:36:25 PM EDT
[#37]
Coincidence? Yes. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/7/2005 11:39:03 PM EDT
[#38]
Precisely. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/7/2005 11:46:12 PM EDT
[#39]
Well if the ban all guns in SF, don't seem right that they still get to read SWAT and SOF ect...Maybe they will ban those types of mags too, after all it is protected by the 1st amendment: why settle for only one amendment to rape.
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/8/2005 1:40:33 AM EDT
[#40]
Because the ACLU supports the first and not the second? |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/8/2005 1:44:39 AM EDT
[#41]
will you be able to keep guns you already own? or will they have to turn those in?
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/8/2005 1:56:27 AM EDT
[#42]
Yeah. I've heard about that. Last time I checked, criminals didn't really care about the law though. My the chowderheads in SF will figure that one out too. I doubt it though, because we have those types of people in King County.
I don't live in King County, thank your deity of choice. |
|
|
|
Posted: 1/8/2005 3:09:32 AM EDT
[#43]
.wa.us has good pre-emption laws, though. as does .ca.us |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/8/2005 7:21:24 AM EDT
[#44]
You'll have to surrender your handguns for the good of the community. You'll be able to keep your "sport rifles" though. |
|
|
|
|
Posted: 1/8/2005 7:30:53 AM EDT
[#45]
I dunno what you guys are all worried about....San Fran...just what I wanna do...hang out with some poo stabbers...
|
|
|
Win a FREE Membership!
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.
