Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Site Notices
Posted: 11/1/2004 1:56:16 PM EDT
I could use a little help with the following problem:
We have to prove that 12, 13, 21, and 31 are the only double-digit numbers whose squares are the reverses of the squares of the reverses of double-digit numbers, specifically the aforementioned numbers.  Both show why it works for these numbers, and that only these numbers work this way.  
Anyone have an idea?  
Thanks
Link Posted: 11/1/2004 1:57:50 PM EDT
[#1]
1+1 = 42
Link Posted: 11/1/2004 1:58:19 PM EDT
[#2]
nope
Link Posted: 11/1/2004 2:03:33 PM EDT
[#3]
Nope. Not here. I can't handle any mathematics that require me to count in excess of the amount of fingers God gave me.
Link Posted: 11/1/2004 3:56:06 PM EDT
[#4]
BUMP!
Link Posted: 11/1/2004 4:02:58 PM EDT
[#5]
Sorry dude, I have to drop my zipper whenever I need to count to 11!
Link Posted: 11/1/2004 4:11:47 PM EDT
[#6]
Start at 10. Do the math. Stop at 99. Have fun!
Link Posted: 11/1/2004 4:14:12 PM EDT
[#7]
You might also want to inquire about any spelling "wizzards" while you're at it... sorry, I just couldn't resist.
Link Posted: 11/1/2004 4:14:48 PM EDT
[#8]
lets see if i can get this right ..223+.308+.50x 1000=
Link Posted: 11/1/2004 4:15:36 PM EDT
[#9]
takes about 2 minutes to solve this in excel...

-luke
Link Posted: 11/1/2004 4:16:02 PM EDT
[#10]

Quoted:
I could use a little help with the following problem:
We have to prove that 12, 13, 21, and 31 are the only double-digit numbers whose squares are the reverses of the squares of the reverses of double-digit numbers, specifically the aforementioned numbers.  Both show why it works for these numbers, and that only these numbers work this way.  
Anyone have an idea?  
Thanks



Did you ask Dr Math?

http://mathforum.org/dr.math/

Link Posted: 11/1/2004 4:20:27 PM EDT
[#11]

Quoted:
I could use a little help with the following problem:
We have to prove that 12, 13, 21, and 31 are the only double-digit numbers whose squares are the reverses of the squares of the reverses of double-digit numbers, specifically the aforementioned numbers.  Both show why it works for these numbers, and that only these numbers work this way.  
Anyone have an idea?  
Thanks



Okay, this is fairly easy.
1.  Take 12x12 = 144, 21x21 = 441 (441 = Reverse 144) (21 = reverse 12)
2.  Take 13x13 = 169, 31x31 = 961 (31x31, again the reverse)

And so on.  

The same works for 21 and 31 as they are only the revereses of 12 and 13, the ones we already did.  

IM me if you have trouble understanding.  

EDIT:  To prove that take two random numbers and do the same operation and show that they are not reversable.  
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top