Quoted:
Quoted:
Quoted: badnarik.org/
went today to the local election office to pick up a copy of what all will be on the ballot and notice this michael badnarik was on the presidental ticket.i figure maybe nader but only bush, kerry and badnarik. has anyone notice anyone different than bush,kerry or nader?
or do i need to listen to other news channels beside fox and reading arfcom for news?
|
That is the way the US system works, it will not change...
You can change the Democrats & Republkicans from the inside, you will never create a parlimentary multiparty system, the US system as it is today is designed for 2 and only 2 parties.
|
Yeah, the Republicans shouldn't have entered the fray in the 1850's. Everyone knows that only a Whig or a Democrat vote mattered. Anything else was a wasted vote...
And a vote for Candidate A is a vote for Candidate A, not B, C, or D. No "new math massaging" will ever change that.
|
As you will notice, there is no Whig party now, they were REPLACED by the Repubs...
We are a perminant 2-party system, as history has demonstrated... 3rd parties that succeed come on very fast and either replace or are re-absorbed by a major party...
The Reform Party (re-absorbed), the Dixiecrats (switched to become Republicans), and the Republican Party (replaced the Whigs) are all examples...
None of these groups was a long-standing party, and none was around for a long time before they became a force. Only the GOP stayed a force, the other 2 folded...
The Libertarians, due to their unpalatable, disasterous platform, will never be a force in US politics. They are too idealistic, and as such cannot govern effectively...
Also, a vote for anyone BUT GW Bush is a vote for Kerry. Period. It's not fuzzy math, it's logic - you are throwing your vote away on a candidate that most of the US would find so repugnant if he ran with media support that he would fall flat on his face...