Lawyer fined $1.8 million for abusing consumer protection law
Wednesday October 20, 2004
By JENNIFER COLEMAN
Associated Press Writer
SACRAMENTO (AP) A Southern California lawyer was ordered to pay nearly $1.8 million for misusing a consumer protection law by filing ``shakedown'' lawsuits against small businesses, Attorney General Bill Lockyer said Wednesday.
Attorney Harpreet Brar was also ordered to repay 10 nail salons and one video store a total of $11,200, Lockyer said.
Lockyer claimed that Brar and the Brar & Gamulin law firm sued hundreds of small businesses in Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside and San Bernardino counties solely to obtain nuisance settlements. He said Brar wrongly accused the business owners of violating unfair business practice laws and then attempted to get quick cash settlements.
``The litigation brought by Brar not only was frivolous, it was abusive. Its only purpose was to line Brar's pockets with unjust profits,'' Lockyer said.
A phone message left for Brar at his law firm, Brar & Gamulin in Long Beach was not immediately returned. The attorney general's claims against Brar's law firm were dismissed.
The State Bar of California is considering a disciplinary complaint against Brar.
Lockyer has filed several such lawsuits against attorneys, alleging that the lawyers misused the state's unfair business practice laws to get quick cash settlements from business owners.
Enacted in 1933 to protect businesses, the law, also known as Business and Professions Code 17200, was later expanded to protect consumers against price-fixing, false advertising and other deceptive business practices.
A ballot measure in front of voters in November would curb the law. Proposition 64 supporters argue that attorneys have used the law to shake down small companies over minor issues, while opponents say it's used to prevent misleading advertising, stop the mislabeling of meat and punish polluters.
A similar lawsuit Lockyer filed against the Trevor Law Group in Beverly Hills is still pending, but the attorneys involved have quit practicing law.
In Brar's case, Lockyer said the attorney targeted nail salons and small markets, many of which were minority-owned. Lockyer said the attorneys would accuse the businesses of technical, sometimes nonexistent, violations and often almost immediately offer to settle for $1,000.
Kevin Nguyen, who works at Francis Nails in Redlands, said Brar threatened to sue the nail salon for using the same bottle of nail polish on more than one customer.
Each of Brar's letters increased the price to settle the claims, Nguyen said. Lockyer said that in one letter to a salon owner, the lawyer warned that the price of settlement could quickly grow, escalating to $2,000 to as much as $10,000.
After several nail salons in the Vietnamese community were targeted, they joined together and hired a lawyer to fight Brar, said Nguyen, whose salon is one of the 11 businesses that will be repaid.
``If our Vietnamese community didn't get together, we probably would have paid him,'' Nguyen said.
It's a good start.