Bush 274, Kerry 264

General » General Discussion

[ARCHIVED THREAD] - Bush 274, Kerry 264

Posted: 10/17/2004 11:05:17 PM EDT

Posted: 10/17/2004 11:06:23 PM EDT

[#1]

damn straight yo

Posted: 10/17/2004 11:12:12 PM EDT

[#2]

Kali-fornia is pretty much going to Kerry, so I'm going to write in Ralph Nader.

Posted: 10/17/2004 11:15:59 PM EDT

[#3]

Damnit, we need PA for a solid win.

- BG

Posted: 10/17/2004 11:16:30 PM EDT

[#4]

Solid or not a win is a win.

Posted: 10/17/2004 11:17:16 PM EDT

[#5]

Quoted:
Solid or not a win is a win.

Id perfer SgtAr15 be right

Posted: 10/17/2004 11:18:12 PM EDT

[#6]

any vote you write in is a vote against bush and for kerry. since there is no way nader is going to win its a waste you may as well stay home. By all means its youre vote so do what you like i just think bush could use the help cause we know we dont want kerry to win

Posted: 10/17/2004 11:19:02 PM EDT

[#7]

Actually in a perfect world he would be wrong.

It should be all 50 states!

Posted: 10/17/2004 11:19:40 PM EDT

[#8]

Quoted:
Solid or not a win is a win.

The more solid the win, the least likely the bellyaching by the libs is going to mean anything.

Can't piss and moan about Florida when Florida isn't the deciding factor!

And the libs WILL be out in force to whine, cheat, and steal.

- BG

Posted: 10/17/2004 11:23:02 PM EDT

[#9]

RealClearPolitics

PresidentElect.org

Posted: 10/17/2004 11:49:57 PM EDT

[#10]

Quoted:
any vote you write in is a vote against bush and for kerry. since there is no way nader is going to win its a waste you may as well stay home. By all means its youre vote so do what you like i just think bush could use the help cause we know we dont want kerry to win

Actually if Nadar get a certain % of the vote 5%? he can get federal funding so next time around he could be stronger and able to get on more ballots to steal votes from the dems, so this is not that bad.

I'm from Il so I've thought about this too, but I can't help it I'm voting for G dubbs.

Posted: 10/17/2004 11:57:41 PM EDT

[#11]

P.S.

The Electoral-Vote.com map is misleading

They used a Rasmusen 2-way poll to make WI go 'For Kerry' by 1 point, but they forgot Nader.

Nader will get 1-2% of the vote in WI, as he IS on the ballot, and has CONTINUALLY polled in that range thruought the campaign....

Of course, the site is run by a Dem, so what do you expect...

Posted: 10/18/2004 11:54:28 AM EDT

[#12]

No state should ever be listed as undecided. absent strong evidence otherwise, any state that Bush won in 2000 he will win in 2004. A repeat of 2000 is the default setting.

Posted: 10/18/2004 12:02:30 PM EDT

[#13]

how funny would it be if Bush won Mass... I'd love that...too bad they are all fucked in the head overthere.

I hope the sox lose

[ARCHIVED THREAD] - Bush 274, Kerry 264

General » General Discussion

Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.

Warning

Confirm Action

About AR15.COM

Stay Connected

Newsletter

Contact Us