Warning

 

Close

Confirm Action

Are you sure you wish to do this?

Confirm Cancel
BCM
User Panel

Posted: 10/14/2004 4:25:41 PM EDT
Link Posted: 10/14/2004 4:30:23 PM EDT
[#1]

Quoted:
............arrest the guy who funded a terrorist attack.

Which do you think is a more effective deterent?

Stupid question?  That's what I heard the other night!

Tj



explain how you're going to nab the guy who funded it without invading.
Link Posted: 10/14/2004 4:34:13 PM EDT
[#2]
I support whichever choice involves carpet bombing.
Link Posted: 10/14/2004 4:34:32 PM EDT
[#3]
Link Posted: 10/14/2004 4:37:15 PM EDT
[#4]

Quoted:

Quoted:
............arrest the guy who funded a terrorist attack.

Which do you think is a more effective deterent?

Stupid question?  That's what I heard the other night!

Tj



explain how you're going to nab the guy who funded it without invading.



In addition, explain how you're gonna nab the guy when the country he resides knows what he did and the gov't is sheltering him.

This is Osama & Afghanistan you're talking about right?
Link Posted: 10/14/2004 4:38:48 PM EDT
[#5]
Well, if much of the country funded, or otherwise facilitated the attack.... arrest them all... but to be practical, that pretty much means "invade the country and put them under house arrest".
Link Posted: 10/14/2004 4:48:11 PM EDT
[#6]
[obligatory] get I mean do both [obligatory]
Link Posted: 10/14/2004 4:49:45 PM EDT
[#7]
Close Join Our Mail List to Stay Up To Date! Win a FREE Membership!

Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!

You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.


By signing up you agree to our User Agreement. *Must have a registered ARFCOM account to win.
Top Top