The USP has almost the exact same grip to bore axis as a 1911. There is just more meat to the slide on the top, so it looks a lot bigger. Break out the ruler and measure it yourself.
I've been carrying a USP 45 that I changed out the variant plate (to a 9) on for about 4 years now. If you want reliability, go with a USP. If you want a lower-cap, unreliable pistol that is expensive to fix, requires tools to take down, and is slow to reload because of a small magwell target - go with a 1911.
I've been shooting IDPA for almost 6 years now, and I can't count the number of malfunction drills people with 1911's do. Not to mention that out of the 4 1911's I've owned, not a single one has gone without a major failure in the first 5,000 rounds. By major failure, I mean a part breakage that caused the gun to be rendered inoperable.
This is in contrast to my first USP 45, which has 12,000 logged rounds through it with only one minor failure due to my shitty reload. My Tactical, which I still own, is pushing 10,000 rounds and has yet to have a failure. The USP 45F stainless that I now carry has yet to have a failure as well, and is looking at about 3,000.
The USP is a brick shithouse. It is the final refinement of John Browning's genius idea. HK's customer service is top notch in my experience. I have had 5 dealings with them, 3 of which were for my P7's, two of which were because of mags that the springs would no longer hold the slide back reliably. In this case, I sent 5 10 round mags back to them, and was returned 5 *12 round LE marked hicaps*. This floored me, as I expected to only get 10 round replacements. What other manufacturer has ever done this?
I love the USP's, and would recommend them to anyone who has large hands. They are certainly big weapons, but carrying 25 rounds of .45 on your person (12 +1 in the gun, 12 rounds in a spare) on a weapon that has 2" accuracy at 25 yards is some serious gear. You get what you pay for, and with HK you get the best. Straight from the factory.
Doc