Edited to add suggestions from Lippo and DavidC. It now reads:
Dear Ms. Stabenow:
You are apparently quite uninformed about the Assault Weapon Ban, what it banned, and what it did not.
First, there is no such thing as a "semiautomatic machine gun". Machine guns are automatic weapons, that is, they fire many rounds, and continue firing with one press of the trigger, until the trigger is released, or the magazine is empty. Semiautomatic firearms fire only once with one pull of the trigger.
Semiauto firearms have been in common use by citizens for target shooting, hunting, and most importantly, home defense, for more than 100 years.
The '94 Assault Weapon Ban had NO affect on machine guns, which have been heavily regulated, and for all practical purposes, banned, since 1934. Machine guns remain illegal for the average citizen.
The Assault Weapon Ban dealt only with cosmetic features of some semiauto firearms. Having these cosmetic features (which did not affect lethality of the firearm in any way) on firearms affected by the ban had draconian prison sentences attached. The ban did not affect many nearly identical firearms without these features. For example, it banned the Colt AR-15 but did not affect the Ruger Mini-14, both of which are semiauto firearms which fire the same cartridge. There is no difference in function or "firepower" between these two guns. This ban did nothing to affect crime, it only had the potential to send otherwise good people to prison.
The Assault Weapon Ban did nothing to improve safety of police officers. If any have told you that, they are either very ignorant of the law, or they are lying. Firearms made before the ban were still legal to buy and sell and possess. Nearly identical firearms without the "evil" assault weapon features banned by the AWB were still available that shot in the same semiauto mode, fired the same cartidges.
I am sorry to tell you, but the "trained experts from our law enforcement agencies" lied to you. The news media repeated these lies loudly and often.
Please don't pull the "for the children" thing on me. This does not work anymore. Firearms accidents with children are at an all time low, and have been steadily dropping for many, many years. Many more children are killed by bath tubs, 5 gallon buckets, swimming pools, automobiles, bikes, and sports than by guns.
Most "children" killed with guns are not really children, but drug dealers killed by police, or killed by each other in turf wars in the 16-25 year old range, not toddlers. When a drug dealer is killed I say, "good riddance".
A recent Department of Justice study has concluded that the effects of the '94 Assault Weapon Ban cannot be determined due to the statistically insignificant use of "assault weapons" in crime.
As my elected representative, I expect you to make informed decisions. I expect you to study the issues, dig out the facts. Apparently you have failed to do so.
Since it's clear you never took the time to understand what you were voting on about the AWB, which you claim is a very important issue, the obvious conclusion is that all of your votes are made based on what biased special interest groups tell you and not what is in the best interests of the people of the state of MI.
"False is the idea of utility... that would take fire from men because it burns, and water because one may drown in it; that has no remedy for evils, except the destruction of liberty." - Thomas Jefferson.
Sincerely,
Guntoting Spartan