If Congress placed a $200 tax on newspapers would that be constitutional? How about if the tax was only only on newspapers that had certain content, perhaps content that was dangerous to the government?
It is my understanding that the FDR wanted the NFA to include handguns, but this did not pass. ("Early versions of the bill proposed including handguns under the comprehensive licensing structures of the NFA, but that provision was eventually dropped from the bill at the NRA's urging."-
source). That is why SBRs were included in the act. It really does not make much sense to regulate SBRs and then not regulate handguns, which are even more concealable. So FDR wanted to impost a $2,700 tax (in current dollars) on all handguns - which basically amounts to a complete ban - and he is not anti-gun?
And let's not forget the (now repealed/repalced by the GCA of 1968) 1938 Federal Firearms Act. The first step in controlling the gun industry and arm sales. How would we all react if you needed a license to print a newspaper or if the government could stop the interstate sale of certain newspapers because they do not have the proper licenses?
As originally enacted, SBRs included rifles with a length of 18" or less. And FDR is not anti-gun? He is an anti-gun sack of shit. He is Sarah Brady in a wheelchair.