Mainly we find out that Bush is more of a fisherman, and Kerry "fronts" hard on being an outdoorsy guy. You know, like windsurfing off the shore of Kennebunghole or wherever he does it.
Anyhoo, I found this quote interesting in light of the AWB demise: (Quotes courtesy F&S)
Evans: (Interviewer) A gun question: "One of the most hotly debated topics among gun owners is the so-called assault weapons ban. Some sportsman think the ban is the first step on a slippery sloper toward broader gun controls. Should they be concerned?"
President Bush: "I think we ought to keep the ban... I've said that the ban ought to be extended but not expanded. Secondly,
they should not be concerned as long as I'm the president." (emphasis mine) "The best gun policy is to find and prosecute those who commit crimes with guns. The best way to protect people's rights to own a gun without undue interference by the government, and I emphasize undue - or unnecessary- is to hold people to account who use guns to commit crimes. You know, I was an instant-background-check person. I think that makes sense. I think most gun owners understand that we don't want people who should not be owning a gun buying a gun. And one way to do so is to use technology in such a way that we are able to identify felons, for example, or people that shouldn't be owning a gun. And I think they ought to be extended to all places guns are sold, by the way, and I know we can do that. But I emphasize the instand background check. This ought not to be a cumbersome process. This ought to be a consumer-friendly process."
I don't mind an instant check. I wish that's all we had here in MI, frankly. I like what he says for the most part. I think he's referring to the oft mentioned "Gun Show Loophole" with his "...I think they ought to be extended to all places guns are sold..." comment. Bush also said that VP Cheney was "No contest" the better shot though.
Here's a Kerry quote or two...
Marshall: "The NRA has given you an "F" throughout your senate career..."
Kerry: "Yeah, because the NRA has a silly methodology that doesn't make any sense. I'm a gun owner. I'm a hunter- I've been a hunter all my life. But I vote for reasonable things. I mean, I just think the Brady Bill is reasonable. They (the NRA) score that a zero. Having assault weapons reaonsonably regulated is intelligent. I mean, I've never thought about going hunting with an assault weapon of war. If you want to wield one of those, then go join the military. I think you can protect the rights of sportsmen, protect the right of people to bear arms. I believe in the second amendment. You know, we've had these laws on the books for 10 years or more: Nobody has ever tried to take anyone's guns away. It's just phoniness, and absolute phoniness the arguments they make. I have the complete intention of protecting the rights of sportsmen. In fact, I think I'm better for the rights of sportsmen than George Bush."
(the interviewer asks "Why is that" and he goes into a long diatribe I am not going to type at this point... so here is a few comments from it)
"And I'm never going to vote to take away guns. I never have. I never sponsored anything to suggest that. But at the same time, with the right to own a gun comes responsibility. Everybody who owns a gun knows that... (snip)...Every law enforcement agency in the country supported restraints on assault weapons. The NRA, in fact, stands against the law enforcement entities of this country. and I think there is something completely out of whack when that becomes the measurement and you, quote "get an F" from people fighting law enforcement and who called the ATF jack-booted thugs. I just can't understand that."