User Panel
Posted: 9/12/2004 6:55:31 AM EDT
Father Arrested After Infant Dies In Hot Van
5-Month-Old Died After Being Left In 92-Degree Heat Sep 10, 2004 6:51 pm US/Pacific SANTA ANA, Calif. (AP) Police on Friday arrested the father of a 5-month-old girl who died after she was left in a locked minivan on a 92-degree day. John Michael Dunton, 42, of Anaheim was in custody on suspicion of child endangerment, police said. Police Chief Paul Walters said investigators believe Dunton, a paralegal, may have forgotten about the baby. "It doesn't mean that he intentionally had this occur," Walters said. "It just means through negligence he allowed it to occur and, therefore, it's criminal." KCAL-TV reported that Dunton was placed on suicide watch in jail after he pleaded with a police officer to let him use his gun. Police said Dunton had to be restrained then sedated at the hospital where the girl was taken Thursday afternoon. Jasmine Dunton died on her way to Western Medical Center after her father summoned authorities to the van late Thursday afternoon. Police said the temperature inside the van was 103 degrees an hour after the child was removed. Lt. Bill Tegeler said Dunton apparently spent the afternoon at work after overlooking the girl in the van. Dunton is married, with a 6-year-old daughter from a previous marriage. I want to see his blood work. What meds are on board? a sober person doesnt "forget" their kid in in the car with them. |
|
I find it amazing how often this shit happens. I just don't see how people could be so f'ing stupid.
|
|
For some inexplicable reason this happens with enough frequency that it's certainly mystifying.
And, as with parents who fail to buckle up their children in autos, CRIMINAL PROSECUTION is idiotic! If there are sound reasons for suspecting that this father 'forgot' his daughter, then 'Book 'em Danno', but there is no reason to add to this father's anquish any more by filing criminal charges against him. That's the 'Soccer Mom' View of the Law: 'If there's a tragedy, someone MUST be to blame!' There are things that happen in this world that we simply do not understand. Put the cuffs away, and allow the father and the family grieve in peace. Eric The(Sympathetic)Hun |
|
We just had a baby die here last week after its mother forgot to take it to daycare and went to work leaving the infant in the car to cook.
|
|
You know this problem happens here in AZ more than anywhere else, and there was tremendous resistance to charging these people for just this reason. In the end the mounting death toll swung everyones opinion, same with all the drownings. |
|
|
I'm not at all mystified. Ive seen enough of these to say that in the majority of the cases drugs or alcohol are involved. Very often it's the parent leaving the child in the car while he/she goes to pick up drugs. Once inside, he/she decides to use there. He/she either passess out, or just gets caught up in the situation, and completely forgets about the child outside due to the intoxicated state. |
|
|
anyone with kids will tell you that "i would never let something that stupid happen to my child"
yet, when i go over to their house on nights where they were up all night with the kids, work, etc. I could easily see one of the kids dozing off while they sped to work for an important meeting- cooly forgetting to drop the kid off at the babysitter. there are people out there who juggle 2 jobs with 5 kids and are struggling to make ends meet. sure, it seems bizarre to many, but in a world where more and more folks are working increasing hours, its bound to happen sooner or later. |
|
Drugged and drunk parents are not mystifying, but the case that you posted does not seem to be one of those sorts of cases, does it?
The father apparently went beserk at the hospital, didn't he? Or was that an act? So, do you think he should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law? Lord, how the law has been changed in the last 50 years! And NOT for the better. Not at all. Eric The(StillSympathetic)Hun |
|
You said it, brutha...how the FUCK do you forget about your CHILD??? |
|
|
Yes, for several reasons. 1. to discourage simular behavior from other parents/serve as example to others. 2. to punish him. 3. to protect his surviving 6 year old child. |
|
|
No way to tell without a tox screen. Just because he is a white paralegal and was not obviously intoxicated when the police found him doesn't meen he hadn't been keeping a buzz on the night before. Officers can only test for alcohol at the scene. But workaholics can forget their children as easily as drug abusers. Either way NOT charging people was NOT helping the situation. So we are going to try charging people for a while. |
|
|
I'm not about to offer an excuse for this guy, nor anyone else this happens to, but I will say it CAN happen, and you DON'T have to be some miscreant to have it happen to you.
This happened to me one day with my then-less-than-one-year-old daughter (who is sitting on my lap as I type this). I went to the store with my FIL and her in back. We went in for about 15 minutes, and I didn't realize it until I popped the trunk to put the groceries in and heard her crying from inside the passenger compartment. I can only thank God that it was early morning in the Florida Keys, in a month where it wasn't all that hot. She was absolutely fine, which is more than I can say for me. My FIL holds to this day that he didn't know she was in the car. Whatever. It was MY responsibility either way. I think that is the lowpoint of my entire life; that I actually forgot my daughter in the car. As such, every time a story like this comes out, I relive that horrible moment all over again. I figure it's going to be my punishment for having been so lax, and I thank God every time that my punishment is so light. Beware people. Losing a kid (literally and figuratively) is far easier than you might think..... BTW, my daughter wants to say hi.... ekfggghyuur6bjdsahhhi1234234567890ryfggfhgfffhhhjnbvcxztodmnhbbbbbbhghgsdfdrrrrrrsddddfdffg jkg huhhbbcc vasabftyttabzefghinmnopq She's only four, so you have to be able to read "baby type".... |
|
Coming from a state where this happens no less than three times a summer; I believe it is poignantly obvious that we must ban automobiles. It's for the children.
Considering how busy and stressed out folks are these days I can understand how this can happen. In one of our local parpers a lady in the "Vent" column said that she always puts her purse in seat next to her baby....( and I love this part ) so that she NEVER FORGETS HER PURSE. Seriously though, it's a good idea....and if your a guy.....well, put your copy of Guns and Ammo back there.....SO YOU DON'T FORGET IT WHEN YOU GET THE BABY!!!! |
|
Ban the sun, too...it's responsible for all this... |
|
|
Its happened three times in the last six DAYS here. Two dead, one clingnig to life. |
||
|
HOLY SHIT!!! Where's Feinstein when ya need her???? Oh, that's right, she off depriving us of our God Given Civil Liberties. |
|||
|
Then again if you weren't slamming someone in the nuts you wouldn't have a job. While I could never forget one of my children in the car, I don't see how this protects his 6 year old.??? Are you on some kinda freakish Kalifornicated wave length the rest of us should know about. While I agree he needs to be made an example of and punished.....I don't see your analogy on #3. I guess he should be locked away forever so as to never have contact with his 6 year old....therefore protecting her.....right......... |
|
|
Good idea but how about first we try installing a sensor system that links to a chip embbed into the baby's neck - Bluetooth could be used - the sensor would monitor the babies health at all times. A second sensor would monitor the driver's seat. Once the seat was empty and the baby was detected inside the car a timer would start. After a set amount of time the horn would honk lightly on and off as a reminder. If the sensor ever detected the baby was in heat destress the car would roll down the windows or start the air conditioner or heater as required and blare the horn. $1500 option available on your Caddy or Lexus - and an additional $2500 to wire each child up with the chip. |
|
|
Because that would be putting the mark of the beast on your child... and the goverment could track the signal... and having grown up with it you child would not have any objection when the .gov came to them as adults and said they wanted to do the same thing "for their own protection"... |
||
|
California is the only state in the union where this is criminal and that it is possibly other states don't have "manslaughter" statues. I think there is a difference between manslaughter - unlawful killing of another person without premeditation or so-called "malice aforethought" and murder - the killing of a human being by a sane person, with intent, malice aforethought (prior intention to kill the particular victim or anyone who gets in the way) and with no legal excuse or authority. The story only sayes that the guy was arrested and held in suspicion of child endangerment but not that he was charged with jack shit at this point. I don't know about you but I've been arrested and held in custody a few times and never been charged but then that's not an interesting story. If would appear that the man in the story might be found guilty of manslaughter as it would seem unlawful to kill another person in such a manner but that it was done without premedition or malice aforthought. YMMV and in your state allowing a six year old to cook to death might be an "oppps". |
|
|
This is a direct result of the nanny state saying that you can't put your child in the front seat of your car. This NEVER happened until the laws were passed saying your child had to be in the back seat and out of sight and out of mind. The father is an idiot, but this happens quite frequently now that those laws are in place.
|
|
How about a simple tether, like those coiled up key chains that go around your wrist only longer? Put the kid in the car and lay the tether on your seat. Then when you get in put it on your wrist.
I dont think that guy needs jail time, he has sentenced himself to his own private hell. |
|
Nanny state nothing, it is a physical FACT that airbags will injure a child. Please put your kid there if you want, so we will be rid of your ignorance.... |
|
|
[TIC] ust think of all the good it could do. It could also be used as an ATM card, a boarding pass, a driver's license, have an MP3 music player built-in ... the government wouldn't use it to track you except in public like on the roads to see how fast you were driving (and send a speeding ticket to your home automatically), to measure the amount of alcohol in your system as you walk out of the bar towards your car (where you could be arrested before getting behind the wheel drunk), walking in and out of banks (sure make tracking drug profits and bank robbers easier). JYour medical records could be linked so that an EMT would know your history (and the insurance agent too). [/TIC] [TIC is tongue in cheek] |
|
|
+1. Airbags kill. A proven fact. Also, if your so stupid to forget your kids in the car, then you don't deserve to be walking the streets either. Lock em up and throw away the key. |
||
|
And it is also law now that front seat airbags have to have the capability to be deactivated. What was your point? |
||
|
According to the insurance companies (who should know) there has never been a properly restrained child (not in a rear facing seat) injured by an air bag. (my dad is in the business) So you are the ignorant one believing what the idiots who had the air bags put in the cars to begin with. By the way, my child always rode in the front seat, is now 14, is uninjured, and (like her father) scores in the genius level of IQs. |
||
|
First, there is NO reason to believe, from the article, that this was the situation that you found so repehensible above, the drunk or drugged parent case, right? Second, you think that our limited and strained to the max, criminal justice system should be cranked up to turn this family's life even more upside down than it already is? You think they don't have enough violent crime in this jurisdiction to prosecute already, that they have to bring the full weight of the State down on this poor soul's head. Oh, and his surviving family's head, as well? I think not. Let it go. As in so many such cases, the CRIME is the PUNISHMENT!
If 'other parents' haven't learned enough to correct their behavior from the countless stories of this happening to others, surely the fact of prosecution would not make them change their ways. The stories, while not rampant, are sufficiently common that every large city has had one of two examples, and those examples have, like this one, been much publicized! What more can parents 'learn' about this?
You really think that this father has not been punished sufficiently already for whatever crime he may have committed? Really? Well, if that's true, I think that the State is getting into an area that may reasonably be called 'cruel and unusual punishment' when it takes the father away from his surviving members at a time when those surviving members may need him the most! And how much money will be lost for the surviving child and his mother when the father pays for his defense, and later, when he is lanquishing in prison. Are you really certain that this added tragedy needs to be placed on this grieving family's back?
That is totally absurd. If the death of a young child is not punishment enough, if the loss is not sufficient enough, if the family's resources are not strained enough, to deter any future similar conduct, then no prison sentence would do the job either. I sense a need for vengenace by some here that is totally out of place in situations such as this! And don't tell me that you are 'doing it for the children'! That excuse has been oblterated by Hillary and her ilk! Eric The(HmmWonderWhatHillaryWouldDo?)Hun |
|||||
|
"Accidentally" kiling your child this way is also a convienent method of retroactive abortion to get rid of a unwanted hastle.
Its simply become too common in Arizona, something had to be done, just like the drownings, up to about one a week. Its not like you to not demand personal responsibility Eric, |
|
Just plain sad.
Incarceration is pointless. No parent is going to deliberately let their child die in a car, whether they can get away with it or not. This guy has already been punished. |
|
That was long the argument against doing it here, but when it became a monthly occurance, minds changed. |
|
|
Because her father is an irresponsible loser who already killed one of his kids by leaving her in a hot car. You cannot possibly over estimate his stupidity. He has shown the ability to kill his other children through his extreme negligence. Lock Dad up until his minor children are old enough to protect themselves. When the surviving children are teenagesrs their fathers negligence wont be as big of a danger to them. |
||
|
The prison sentence should be severe enough that every parent reconsiders even leaving their child in the car for ten seconds to put something in the mailbox. In MOST of these cases the parent deliberately left the child in the car, expecting to come right back in a few seconds or minutes, and then got side tracked with fatal results. |
||||||
|
Mom unquestioned in baby's heat death
2 cases in month handled differently Lindsey Collom The Arizona Republic Sept. 11, 2004 12:00 AM Two mothers grieved for their infants who died a month apart from heat stroke after being left in sweltering vehicles. Kim Crawford, 27, of Mesa, mourned Friday with family. Vanesselt Raban, 29, of Phoenix, did so in a jail cell after her infant's death in August. Police say one difference is that Crawford had no other children. Raban had five; the youngest, a 7-month-old boy, died Aug. 10. "We don't believe there's a public safety risk here," said Sgt. Randy Force of Phoenix police. "This woman (Crawford) has no other children that need to be protected." Her only child died early Friday. Four-month-old Jordan Crawford was left in a minivan parked outside an office building for three hours Thursday. Her mother forgot to drop her at day care, and by the time she remembered, it was 102 degrees outside and about 140 degrees in the vehicle. Crawford rushed to retrieve the baby girl, whose temperature was 109 degrees. She was flown to Maricopa Medical Center, and succumbed to hyperthermia at 2:40 a.m. Friday. Investigators have yet to get a statement from Crawford because they want to be compassionate to her situation, Force said. He could not speak about how detectives handled the Raban case. Vanesselt Raban was arrested when her infant died. Raban put her 10-year-old son in charge of taking his baby brother, Quentan, out of the family van after she picked up her kids from school Aug. 10. Police say she played on the computer for at least an hour until she realized the boy was not in the house. Quentan had a temperature of 108 degrees. He died at Maryvale Hospital later that afternoon. Detective Tony Morales of Phoenix police called it "gross negligence." Force said that, for Crawford, it was "one morning lapse." Both cases remain under investigation. More than a dozen children in Arizona have died of hyperthermia in vehicles since 1988, according to the national non-profit group Kids and Cars. Parents were arrested in four of those cases. On Friday, a Scottsdale woman who also left her toddler in a car this week was hauled into court but will not have to attend a funeral. Scottsdale police Detective Sam Bailey said Pam Logan, 34, dined in a restaurant in the 15000 block of North Pima Road on Thursday evening, and asked other patrons to check on her 1 ½-year-old daughter. Police found the girl unharmed in a vehicle with the windows down. Bailey said Logan faces charges of endangerment and neglect. Child Protective Services was contacted and the child was placed in her grandmother's custody. Marc Budoff, a Phoenix defense attorney and former Maricopa County prosecutor, said the decision to charge a parent in this sort of case is both "difficult and terrible." "One thing that seems to stick in my mind is if it was clearly an unintended accident and the parent wasn't occupied with something unusual, like going to a casino or a bar, I have a difficult time seeing what purpose is served by prosecution," Budoff said. |
|
Then we had another one yesterday Another Valley Baby Left In Hot Car 09-11-2004 12:35 AM (Scottsdale, AZ) -- Less than a day after a baby died because she was left in a hot car, another Valley woman is accused of doing the same thing. Police say the difference is 37-year-old Pam Logan knew her one-and-a-half-year-old son was in the car. Police say Logan was inside a Scottsdale restaurant early Thursday night having dinner and actually asked patrons as they were leaving to check on her son. They called police after becoming concerned. The child is okay and Logan has been charged with child neglect and child endangerment. |
|
|
Post from AR15fan:
Please! The State of Texas has been executing murderers convicted of capital murder for more than 30 years since Furman vs. US and folks in Texas are STILL murdering other folks! Should we execute this father? When we start trying to fashion remedies for every conceivable ill and injury in this country we are getting into a serious moral quagmire! Forget the so-called 'Nanny State', we are on the road to a 'Police State'! Eric The(VeryReasonable)Hun |
|
|
This is from the NHTSA's website:
"The U.S. Department of Transportation’s National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) and the National SAFE KIDS Campaign today reminded parents and caregivers that leaving children unattended in a motor vehicle can quickly lead to fatal consequences, especially in warm weather. NHTSA also issued summer safety tips for parents and caregivers. "From 1996 to the present [2004], at least 241 children have died of heatstroke after being trapped inside parked cars, and at least 19 have died already this year. Most of the children were in child safety seats and left behind or forgotten by an adult. Others gained access to an unlocked car and then became trapped inside." www.nhtsa.dot.gov/nhtsa/announce/press/pressdisplay.cfm?year=2004&filename=pr32-04.html So, in eight years, 241 children have died from heatstroke in locked cars. That's an average of roughly 30 children per year, 30 too many, but nevertheless, children are much more likely to drown in a pool unattened in their own back yard as to die from heatstroke in a locked and unattended vehicle. Now, what other leading causes of accidental deaths of children are there? "If the focus is on children under age 5, then outlawing swimming pools and bathtubs (350 drowning deaths) or cigarette lighters (90 deaths) would save many more children under 5 from accidental deaths than would a gun ban (34 deaths)." home.speedsoft.com/theashes/koppel.html And yet with those astounding numbers of 350 dead children per year from swimming pools and bathtubs, I have yet to ever hear of a parent being charged with a crime for the death of a child in a swimming pool or a bathtub! Is there NO NEGLECT when a parent leaves a swimming pool unguarded, a swimming child unattended, or a bathing child by itself? Where are the prosecutions in those cases? Would you support going after those parents 'to the fullest extent of the law'???!!! Have you ever heard of a parent being prosecuted for the death of a child in a swimming pool or a bathtub? Come now, what we see here is a tragedy. A simple regrettable tragedy. One that could have been avoided, but somehow wasn't. Why compound that tragedy by SELECTIVELY prosecuting some parents and not others? By prosecuting parents who negligently lock their children in overheated cars, but not those parents who fail to secure swimming pools or watch over their children in bathtubs? It's an emotional issue to be sure. BUT EMOTIONS DO NOT BELONG IN CRIMINAL LAW! Eric The(CalmAndCollectedWhenHeWantsToBe)Hun |
|
All I know is that I was VERY quiet the rest of that weekend. I am convinced that if anything had happened to my little girl, I wouldn't have needed a prison; I would have needed an assylum.
The fact is that the child is the inescapable responsibility of the parent. You can point at airbags, car seats, or anything else, and it STILL boils down to the fact that the parent needs only to REMEMBER that their kid is in there. As for punishments, I believe that the criminal penalties should be severe if there are going to be any, but I don't think ANYTHING will be worse than simply letting them live their lives knowing that their stupidity killed their child. I still shudder when I remember..... |
|
What both of those causes of death in children have in common is parental irresponsibility. Leaving your child to die in a hot car, letting her drown in a swimming pool, or letting her play with a straight razor are all the same thing IMO. Criminal negligence. BTW; Yes Eric, we do prosecute parents who let their kids drown in swimming pools. Call us progressive, if you do something either through negligence or an overt act that results in injury to your child, you will be arrested and charged with child endangerment/child neglect, at least. |
|
|
Well, we will have to agree to disagree on this matter.
IF there is no evidence of drug or alcohol abuse at the time that the child is left unattended, and it simply turns out to be a matter of extreme negligence, there is NOTHING that society should add to the pain and suffering of the family. And that includes the criminal indictment of the parent, and his or her subsequent incarceration. Society should not even think of adding the financial burden of a criminal defense attorney to the family at a time when they are likely seeking to bury their child. Is THIS the kind of primitve retribution that is NOT even permitted in Old Testament days? Ancient societies never exacted any sort of blood punishment when the victim was one of the perpetrator's own family! They knew that the pain of the loss was punishment enough! We, however, of the Brave New World seek to exact punishment for the accidental death of children at a time when the abortion mills are....smoking away! God is not mocked...trust me. Eric The(Empathetic)Hun |
|
Pardon me, Sir, but if you wish to quote me, then please answer the question that I put to you... Do YOU know of any parent who was criminally prosecuted for the death by drowning of their child at a backyard swimming pool or in their bathtub??!! I don't and I doubt that it ever occurs! The parents who are routinely charged with the offense of leaving their children unattended in locked cars are usually, if not always, of a financial class that do NOT own swimming pools in their backyards! Hmm, maybe their children are more precious to society than the children of doctors, lawyers, and judges. An average of 240 children under the age of 5 drown in their own swimming pools and bathtubs each year. Where are the criminal prosecutions of THOSE neglectful, negligent, or drunk or drugged parents? Hmmm? Eric The(ItSeemsToBeEmotionsThatDriveThisVendetta)Hun |
||
|
Post from AR15fan:
Sorry, but you edited your previous post to include this response. I take it that when you say 'we' you are referring to the State of California? Good! That State has extensive online web services that track criminal prosecutions. Please cite at least one such case. Either on the State of California's criminal web servers or by a newspaper article. You can say that it is so, but with such an obviously emotional issue, forgive me if I wish to see proofl Eric The(Doubting)Hun |
|
|
Exactly, it's a horrible thing but not always drug or alcohol related. There was a case of this in Tulsa a few years ago, father with a high stress job, parked at work in the summertime, came out at the end of the day and found the child. Charges weren't brought after the investigation. |
|
|
Post from JTAC_Supply:
If that was the case of the stockbroker whose child was in the SUV with the highly tinted windows, which, even though the vehicle was passed by dozens of people during the day, precluded anyone fom noticing the hapless child, then it is likely that his financial status was such that he enjoyed a modicum of immunity from prosecution that poor whites, blacks and Hispanics might not likewise enjoy. This is something of a class-based selective prosecution, IMHO! Of course, that may be true of a lot of prosecutions.... Eric The(Equitable)Hun Edited to add: This fellow never took his child to the day care center, IIRC,, but his wife was elsewhere and, during his trip received some urgent phone call that took his mind completely off his main business - taking care of his child. |
|
|
Sign up for the ARFCOM weekly newsletter and be entered to win a free ARFCOM membership. One new winner* is announced every week!
You will receive an email every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the hottest topics, breaking news surrounding legislation, as well as exclusive deals only available to ARFCOM email subscribers.
AR15.COM is the world's largest firearm community and is a gathering place for firearm enthusiasts of all types.
From hunters and military members, to competition shooters and general firearm enthusiasts, we welcome anyone who values and respects the way of the firearm.
Subscribe to our monthly Newsletter to receive firearm news, product discounts from your favorite Industry Partners, and more.
Copyright © 1996-2024 AR15.COM LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Any use of this content without express written consent is prohibited.
AR15.Com reserves the right to overwrite or replace any affiliate, commercial, or monetizable links, posted by users, with our own.