Air marshal checks lax, study saysTHE ASSOCIATED PRESS
WASHINGTON - The government hired air marshals who had been involved in cases of misconduct, and it fails to hold them to a high enough disciplinary standard, the Homeland Security Department's inspector general said.
"Many federal air marshals were granted access to classified information after displaying questionable judgment, irresponsibility and emotionally unstable behavior," Inspector General Clark Kent Ervin said in a report Monday.
Asa Hutchinson, the department's undersecretary, disagreed with the report's conclusions.
In a written response, Hutchinson said new standards and guidelines have been set for determining whether applicants are suitable to be air marshals, whose job is primarily guarding planes while they are in flight.
Thousands of air marshals were rushed into service after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. The exact number is classified, and the marshals travel undercover, but pilots say they guard only a small percentage of daily flights.
The Federal Air Marshal Service moved to the Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement from the Transportation Security Administration in November.
Disciplinary problems with the air marshals arose in 2003. Managers within the Federal Air Marshal Service subsequently reviewed the files of 161 applicants and found some had been given pre-hiring top-secret clearances despite financial, employment and criminal problems in the past, the report said.
Of 161 cases, 62 had been accused of domestic violence or assault, drunken driving or sexual harassment, and half of those were arrested at least twice in the past decade.
Others had filed for bankruptcy in the last seven years, misused government resources, been fired or suspended or made to forfeit pay in previous jobs.
None of the 161 were subsequently hired, said Dave Adams, a spokesman for the air marshal service.
Ervin's report said 104 air marshals who had been granted security clearances had been involved in 155 cases of misconduct when they worked for the Bureau of Prisons previously. Offenses included falling asleep on duty, verbal abuse, breach of security, physical abuse of an inmate and misuse of government property and credit cards.
Adams said the service began reviewing background checks of all air marshals before the report came out to make sure they meet a higher standard appropriate for law enforcement officers. Ervin's report also said discipline is sometimes lax in the air marshal service.
Between February and October 2002, there were 753 documented reports of sleeping on duty, lying, testing positive for alcohol or illegal drugs while on the job or losing weapons, the report said. In many cases, air marshals were suspended with pay.
Federal airport screeners would have been fired or suspended without pay for similar offenses, the report said. "Since air marshals are weapon-carrying law enforcement officers, they can and should be held to a standard of conduct at least as high as that of screeners."
Hutchinson said many accusations of misconduct were less severe - for example, for rudeness or tardiness - than the inspector general reported. He said 101 air marshals were fired between March 2002 and March 2004. Thirty-two more quit rather than be fired, he said.
But Hutchinson agreed that two air marshals found to have used marijuana probably should have been fired faster. The two marshals were placed on leave in May and June 2003 but were paid through January 2004.